50 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bjarke Sporring
6cf0418ebd fix: remove references to git reset 2026-01-16 10:18:46 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
a8e9507f89 fix: missing images for ssh setup 2026-01-15 18:30:52 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
a895abdd03 feat: drastically simplify tasks for multiplayer 2026-01-15 17:30:03 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
356b6268ba refactor: remove advanced for now 2026-01-15 17:27:35 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
bd69774191 feat: drastically simplify the multiplayer module 2026-01-15 17:25:33 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
fcaf97f60b refactor: simplify the multiplayer part 2026-01-15 17:03:51 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
2a5eb137f6 fix: stash challenge 2026-01-15 16:42:45 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
b0d2d43c8b fix: stash issues 2026-01-15 16:37:57 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
cdd695b250 fix: cleanup revert module 2026-01-15 16:29:06 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
0474a6de0e fix: remove revert-middle challenge 2026-01-15 16:23:32 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
575e083f33 refactor: rewrite the merge-revert section
It is an advanced and difficult revert to accomplish and should probably
be done through a reset instead, which means that we're modifying
history which is dangerous and so should be handled by someone who
understands these dangers.
2026-01-15 16:11:24 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
aa24c50b45 fix: revert conflict 2026-01-15 15:50:54 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
939bd397f1 refactor: move 08 down a step 2026-01-15 15:42:05 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
3130874981 fix: cleanup cherry-picking tasks and tips 2026-01-15 15:41:21 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
a34b7d155f refactor: move reset to advanced 2026-01-15 15:22:45 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
1c20a06c21 fix: cherry-pick conflict 2026-01-15 15:20:32 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
988ce3bc92 fix: remove subproject "challenge" folders 2026-01-15 14:31:30 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
9fbdd941fa feat: check for mainbranch 2026-01-15 14:31:00 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
40341d21a7 fix: add suggestion for a new file for branching and merging 2026-01-15 14:30:08 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
8a82253fc2 fix: add better explanation of merges 2026-01-15 14:22:11 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
f0522e14bc feat: setup merge and diff for git 2026-01-15 14:07:25 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
0183a06134 feat: set git defaultBranch to main 2026-01-15 13:55:55 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
c3d9d3337c refactor: add better instructions for branching and merging 2026-01-15 13:47:30 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
ced65740a3 fix: naming of main branch write host 2026-01-15 13:16:34 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
bf07cb1868 refactor: check for main branch 2026-01-15 13:14:38 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
7b638d27de refactor: we're breaking out merge-conflicts 2026-01-15 12:51:43 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
ea5cbccc75 refactor: simplify the multiplayer part of Git 2026-01-15 12:04:20 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
76c4182186 feat: update README to include SSH guidelines 2026-01-15 12:03:50 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
5b4c544fee feat: add a WHAT-IS-GIT file that describes the essentials of what GIT is 2026-01-15 12:03:12 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
74a23dbbca feat: add commit message best practices 2026-01-15 12:02:25 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
25077cd589 feat: add a simple best practices for when working together 2026-01-15 12:02:13 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
8b3ba808d1 feat: add azure devops ssh setup guidelines 2026-01-15 12:01:23 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
9e03a9624a fix: verification of answers for history 2026-01-15 12:01:07 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
b2b8a2cfff feat: make the steps more explicit 2026-01-15 11:45:58 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
7e2f8d64fb refactor: simplify user choice. Install and clone split 2026-01-15 10:29:34 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
eadf8cfe6a fix: version checks 2026-01-15 10:23:15 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
9e22f84a53 fix: init of prereqs 2026-01-15 10:14:15 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
daa787842a fix: remove the statement? 2026-01-15 10:11:40 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
a392e8c97d feat: add a "what do you want" step 2026-01-15 10:09:11 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
009a3a9104 fix: proper version formatting for install version check 2026-01-15 10:03:21 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
32a0e89f72 fix: let's just try to find a version inside the version string 2026-01-15 09:55:54 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
91c46718c6 fix: version regex for git and other semver stuff 2026-01-14 17:48:57 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
c99e238814 fix: version match 2026-01-14 17:42:40 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
2633ee2b71 Add clear terminal opening guidance for VSCode
- Enhance instructions for opening integrated terminal in VSCode
- Provide multiple methods: Ctrl+backtick, menu, and Command Palette
- Add visual separation with headers for important information
- Emphasize that terminal opening is REQUIRED for next steps
- Include detailed fallback instructions if VSCode command fails
- Make terminal guidance impossible to miss with multiple clear options
- Remove ambiguity about how to access terminal in VSCode
2026-01-14 17:29:22 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
c28151cc19 Fix version parsing in Install-Package for Windows Git format
- Update regex to extract only semantic version numbers (x.y.z)
- Prevents matching entire string like '2.52.0.windows.1'
- Uses '^(\d+(?:\.\d+){1,2})' to match version at start of string only
- Extracts '2.52.0' from '2.52.0.windows.1' for proper version comparison
- Handles Windows Git version suffixes correctly
- Maintains compatibility with standard version formats
2026-01-14 17:24:33 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
07faa14b7a Remove Python installation and add one-shot install instructions
- Remove all Python-related installation logic since Module 08 is Git-only
- Update synopsis to mention repository cloning capability
- Add one-shot installation instructions using Invoke-RestMethod
- Remove Python from results tracking, installation prompts, and verification
- Simplify installation summary without Python references
- Update examples to show both one-shot and local execution methods
2026-01-14 17:12:03 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
09f25d6eae Add repository cloning and VSCode opening to install.ps1
- Ask user if they want to clone workshop to Documents/git-workshop
- Automatically clone repository to Documents folder for convenience
- Open VSCode in the workshop directory after cloning
- Handle existing repositories (update if already cloned)
- Provide quick start commands for VSCode terminal
- Fallback to manual instructions if user declines or cloning fails
- Complete end-to-end setup experience
2026-01-14 17:03:04 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
cbefeaf4d2 refactor: move install-prerequisites to install.ps1 2026-01-14 17:00:02 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
7066e648d5 refactor: do not exit on script finish 2026-01-14 16:57:54 +01:00
Bjarke Sporring
14cfc2feeb Fix Git version check to handle Windows formatting
- Update Test-GitVersion to properly parse Git versions with Windows suffixes
- Handle formats like '2.52.0.windows.1' correctly
- Parse major and minor version numbers separately for accurate comparison
- Now correctly identifies versions 2.23+ regardless of Windows-specific suffixes
- Add better error message when version parsing fails
2026-01-14 16:56:29 +01:00
70 changed files with 4896 additions and 10777 deletions

View File

@@ -29,20 +29,25 @@ Your goal is to commit both `welcome.txt` and `instructions.txt` to a git reposi
1. Navigate into the `challenge` directory: `cd challenge`
2. **Initialize a new git repository**: `git init` (this is your first step!)
3. Check the status of your repository: `git status`
4. Stage the files you want to commit: `git add welcome.txt` (or `git add .` to stage all files)
5. Create a commit: `git commit -m "Your commit message"`
6. Verify both files are committed: `git ls-tree -r HEAD --name-only`
4. Stage the file you want to commit: `git add welcome.txt` (or `git add .` to stage all files)
5. Check the status again and see the difference `git status`. Notice the file is now *staged* and ready to be committed.
6. Create a commit: `git commit -m "add welcome.txt"`
5. Check the status again and see the difference `git status`. Notice the file no longer appears in the output.
7. Stage the next file: `git add instructions.txt` (or `git add .` to stage all files)
8. Check the status again and see the difference `git status`. Notice the file is now *staged* and ready to be committed.
9. Create a commit: `git commit -m "add instructions.txt"`
10. Check the status again and see the difference `git status`. Notice that the files are now not shown in status. If and when you change something about the file you will once again see it in the `git status` command.
**Important Notes**:
- The challenge directory is NOT a git repository until you run `git init`. This is intentional - you're learning to start from scratch!
- You can commit both files together in one commit, or separately in multiple commits - it's up to you!
- You can commit both files together in one commit, or separately in multiple commits (use `git add .` to add all files in the folder) - it's up to you!
- The verification script checks that both files are committed, not the specific commit messages or order
### Key Concepts
- **Repository**: A directory tracked by git, containing your project files and their history
- **Working Directory**: The files you see and edit
- **Staging Area (Index)**: A preparation area for your next commit
- **Staging Area**: A preparation area for your next commit, you first add the files to the stage, and then you commit the files to repository.
- **Commit**: A snapshot of your staged changes
### Useful Commands

View File

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ if (-not (Test-Path "answers.md")) {
$answersLower = $answers.ToLower()
# Check 1: Contains "5" or "five" for commit count
if ($answersLower -match "5|five") {
if ($answersLower -match "5|five|fem") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Correct commit count found" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Commit count not found or incorrect" -ForegroundColor Red
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ if (-not (Test-Path "answers.md")) {
}
# Check 4: Contains "config" keyword for staged file
if ($answersLower -match "config") {
if ($answersLower -match "config.py") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Staged file identified" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Staged file not identified" -ForegroundColor Red

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -1,216 +1,23 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the challenge environment to a specific checkpoint.
Resets the Module 03 challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
This script allows you to jump to any checkpoint in the module,
resetting your repository to that state. Useful for skipping ahead,
starting over, or practicing specific sections.
.PARAMETER Checkpoint
The checkpoint to reset to: start, merge, or merge-conflict.
If not specified, displays help information.
.EXAMPLE
.\reset.ps1
Shows available checkpoints and current status.
.EXAMPLE
.\reset.ps1 start
Resets to the beginning (branching basics section).
.EXAMPLE
.\reset.ps1 merge
Jumps to the merging section (feature-login branch already exists).
.EXAMPLE
.\reset.ps1 merge-conflict
Jumps to the conflict resolution section (merge already complete).
This script removes the challenge directory, allowing you to start fresh.
Run setup.ps1 again after resetting to recreate the environment.
#>
param(
[ValidateSet('start', 'merge', 'merge-conflict', '')]
[string]$Checkpoint = ''
)
Write-Host "`n=== Resetting Module 03 Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Checkpoint to tag mapping
$checkpointTags = @{
'start' = 'checkpoint-start'
'merge' = 'checkpoint-merge'
'merge-conflict' = 'checkpoint-merge-conflict'
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
Write-Host "`n[SUCCESS] Challenge environment reset complete!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nRun .\setup.ps1 to create a fresh challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host ""
} else {
Write-Host "`n[INFO] No challenge directory found. Nothing to reset." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Run .\setup.ps1 to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host ""
}
# Checkpoint descriptions
$checkpointDescriptions = @{
'start' = 'Branching Basics - Create and work with feature branches'
'merge' = 'Merging Branches - Merge feature-login into main'
'merge-conflict' = 'Resolving Conflicts - Fix merge conflicts in config.json'
}
# ============================================================================
# Display help if no checkpoint specified
# ============================================================================
if ($Checkpoint -eq '') {
Write-Host "`n=== Module 03: Branching and Merging - Checkpoints ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nAvailable checkpoints:" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
foreach ($key in @('start', 'merge', 'merge-conflict')) {
$desc = $checkpointDescriptions[$key]
Write-Host " $key" -ForegroundColor Green -NoNewline
Write-Host " - $desc" -ForegroundColor White
}
Write-Host "`nUsage:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " .\reset.ps1 <checkpoint>" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Examples:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " .\reset.ps1 start # Start from the beginning" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " .\reset.ps1 merge # Jump to merging section" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " .\reset.ps1 merge-conflict # Jump to conflict resolution" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
# Try to detect current checkpoint
if (Test-Path "challenge/.git") {
Push-Location "challenge"
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
$currentCommit = git rev-parse HEAD 2>$null
# Check which checkpoint we're at
$currentCheckpoint = $null
foreach ($cp in @('start', 'merge', 'merge-conflict')) {
$tagCommit = git rev-parse $checkpointTags[$cp] 2>$null
if ($currentCommit -eq $tagCommit) {
$currentCheckpoint = $cp
break
}
}
if ($currentCheckpoint) {
Write-Host "Current checkpoint: " -ForegroundColor Yellow -NoNewline
Write-Host "$currentCheckpoint" -ForegroundColor Green -NoNewline
Write-Host " (on branch $currentBranch)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
} else {
Write-Host "Current status: " -ForegroundColor Yellow -NoNewline
Write-Host "In progress (on branch $currentBranch)" -ForegroundColor White
}
Pop-Location
}
Write-Host ""
exit 0
}
# ============================================================================
# Validate challenge directory exists
# ============================================================================
if (-not (Test-Path "challenge")) {
Write-Host "[ERROR] Challenge directory not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Run .\setup.ps1 first to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Yellow
exit 1
}
if (-not (Test-Path "challenge/.git")) {
Write-Host "[ERROR] No git repository found in challenge directory." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Run .\setup.ps1 first to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Yellow
exit 1
}
# Navigate to challenge directory
Push-Location "challenge"
# ============================================================================
# Verify the checkpoint tag exists
# ============================================================================
$targetTag = $checkpointTags[$Checkpoint]
$tagExists = git tag -l $targetTag
if (-not $tagExists) {
Write-Host "[ERROR] Checkpoint tag '$targetTag' not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Run ..\setup.ps1 to recreate the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Pop-Location
exit 1
}
# ============================================================================
# Check for uncommitted changes
# ============================================================================
$statusOutput = git status --porcelain 2>$null
if ($statusOutput) {
Write-Host "`n[WARNING] You have uncommitted changes!" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "The following changes will be lost:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host ""
git status --short
Write-Host ""
$response = Read-Host "Continue and discard all changes? (y/N)"
if ($response -ne 'y' -and $response -ne 'Y') {
Write-Host "`nReset cancelled." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Pop-Location
exit 0
}
}
# ============================================================================
# Reset to checkpoint
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nResetting to checkpoint: $Checkpoint" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Description: $($checkpointDescriptions[$Checkpoint])" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
try {
# Reset to the checkpoint tag
git reset --hard $targetTag 2>&1 | Out-Null
# Clean untracked files
git clean -fd 2>&1 | Out-Null
# Ensure we're on main branch
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current
if ($currentBranch -ne 'main') {
git switch main 2>&1 | Out-Null
git reset --hard $targetTag 2>&1 | Out-Null
}
Write-Host "[SUCCESS] Reset to checkpoint '$Checkpoint' complete!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host ""
# Show what to do next
switch ($Checkpoint) {
'start' {
Write-Host "Next steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. Create a new branch: git switch -c feature-login" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Create login.py and make 2+ commits" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Verify: ..\verify.ps1 start" -ForegroundColor White
}
'merge' {
Write-Host "Next steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. View branch structure: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Merge feature-login: git merge feature-login" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Verify: ..\verify.ps1 merge" -ForegroundColor White
}
'merge-conflict' {
Write-Host "Next steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. Attempt merge: git merge update-config" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Resolve conflicts in config.json" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Complete merge: git add config.json && git commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Verify: ..\verify.ps1 merge-conflict" -ForegroundColor White
}
}
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "View current state: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host ""
} catch {
Write-Host "[ERROR] Failed to reset to checkpoint." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host $_.Exception.Message -ForegroundColor Red
Pop-Location
exit 1
}
Pop-Location
exit 0

View File

@@ -1,17 +1,13 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the Module 03 checkpoint-based challenge environment.
Sets up the Module 03 challenge environment for branching and merging.
.DESCRIPTION
This script creates a challenge directory with a complete Git repository
containing all commits and checkpoints for learning branching, merging,
and merge conflict resolution in one continuous workflow.
The script creates three checkpoints:
- checkpoint-start: Beginning of branching basics
- checkpoint-merge: Beginning of merging section
- checkpoint-merge-conflict: Beginning of conflict resolution
This script creates a challenge directory with a Git repository containing
a realistic project history with multiple merged branches. Students will see
what branching and merging looks like in practice, then create their own
branches to experiment.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Setting up Module 03: Branching and Merging ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
@@ -35,114 +31,89 @@ git init | Out-Null
git config user.name "Workshop Student"
git config user.email "student@example.com"
# Detect the default branch name (could be main, master, etc.)
# First commit creates the branch, so we detect it after that
$mainBranch = git branch --show-current
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Fallback: Get default branch name from git config
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Ultimate fallback: use "main"
$mainBranch = "main"
}
}
Write-Host "Default branch detected: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
# ============================================================================
# PHASE 1: Branching Basics - Initial commits on main
# Create a realistic project history with multiple merged branches
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nPhase 1: Creating initial project structure..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Creating project history with multiple branches..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Commit 1: Initial commit
$mainContent = @"
# main.py - Main application file
# Initial commits on main
$readmeContent = @"
# My Application
def main():
print("Welcome to the Application!")
print("This is the main branch")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
A sample application for learning Git branching and merging.
"@
Set-Content -Path "main.py" -Value $mainContent
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readmeContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit" | Out-Null
# Commit 2: Add main functionality
$mainContent = @"
# main.py - Main application file
def main():
print("Welcome to the Application!")
print("This is the main branch")
run_application()
def run_application():
print("Application is running...")
print("Ready for new features!")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
"@
Set-Content -Path "main.py" -Value $mainContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add main functionality" | Out-Null
# Tag checkpoint-start (students begin here - will create feature-login)
Write-Host "Creating checkpoint: start" -ForegroundColor Green
git tag checkpoint-start
git commit -m "Add main application file" | Out-Null
# ============================================================================
# PHASE 2: Create feature-login branch (what students will do in checkpoint 1)
# Branch 1: feature-login (will be merged)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "Phase 2: Creating feature-login branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Create and switch to feature-login branch
Write-Host "Creating feature-login branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch -c feature-login | Out-Null
# Commit 3: Add login module
$loginContent = @"
# login.py - User login module
# login.py - User authentication
def login(username, password):
"""Authenticate a user."""
print(f"Authenticating user: {username}")
# TODO: Add actual authentication logic
return True
def logout(username):
"""Log out a user."""
print(f"Logging out user: {username}")
print(f"Logging in user: {username}")
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "login.py" -Value $loginContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add login module" | Out-Null
# Commit 4: Add password validation
$loginContent = @"
# login.py - User login module
# login.py - User authentication
def validate_password(password):
"""Validate password strength."""
if len(password) < 8:
return False
return True
return len(password) >= 8
def login(username, password):
"""Authenticate a user."""
if not validate_password(password):
print("Password too weak!")
return False
print(f"Authenticating user: {username}")
# TODO: Add actual authentication logic
return True
def logout(username):
"""Log out a user."""
print(f"Logging out user: {username}")
print(f"Logging in user: {username}")
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "login.py" -Value $loginContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add password validation" | Out-Null
# Switch back to main
git switch main | Out-Null
# Switch back to main branch
git switch $mainBranch | Out-Null
# Now create divergence - add commits to main while feature-login exists
Write-Host "Creating divergent history on main..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Commit 5: Add app.py with basic functionality
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Main application entry point
# app.py - Application entry point
from main import main
@@ -150,7 +121,6 @@ def run():
"""Run the application."""
print("Starting application...")
main()
print("Application finished.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
run()
@@ -159,16 +129,65 @@ Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add app.py entry point" | Out-Null
# Commit 6: Add README
# Merge feature-login into $mainBranch
Write-Host "Merging feature-login into $mainBranch..." -ForegroundColor Green
git merge feature-login --no-edit | Out-Null
# ============================================================================
# Branch 2: feature-api (will be merged)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "Creating feature-api branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch -c feature-api | Out-Null
$apiContent = @"
# api.py - API endpoints
def get_data():
"""Retrieve data from API."""
return {"status": "ok", "data": []}
def post_data(data):
"""Send data to API."""
print(f"Posting data: {data}")
return {"status": "ok"}
"@
Set-Content -Path "api.py" -Value $apiContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add API module" | Out-Null
$apiContent = @"
# api.py - API endpoints
def get_data():
"""Retrieve data from API."""
return {"status": "ok", "data": []}
def post_data(data):
"""Send data to API."""
print(f"Posting data: {data}")
return {"status": "ok"}
def delete_data(id):
"""Delete data by ID."""
print(f"Deleting data: {id}")
return {"status": "ok"}
"@
Set-Content -Path "api.py" -Value $apiContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add delete endpoint to API" | Out-Null
# Switch back to main branch and add documentation
git switch $mainBranch | Out-Null
$readmeContent = @"
# My Application
Welcome to my application!
A sample application for learning Git branching and merging.
## Features
- Main functionality
- More features coming soon
- User authentication
- Main application logic
## Setup
@@ -176,104 +195,121 @@ Run: python app.py
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readmeContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add README documentation" | Out-Null
git commit -m "Update README with setup instructions" | Out-Null
# Tag checkpoint-merge (students begin merging here - divergent branches ready)
Write-Host "Creating checkpoint: merge" -ForegroundColor Green
git tag checkpoint-merge
# Merge feature-api into $mainBranch
Write-Host "Merging feature-api into $mainBranch..." -ForegroundColor Green
git merge feature-api --no-edit | Out-Null
# ============================================================================
# PHASE 3: Merge feature-login into main (what students will do in checkpoint 2)
# Branch 3: feature-database (will be merged)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "Phase 3: Merging feature-login into main..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Creating feature-database branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch -c feature-database | Out-Null
# Merge feature-login into main (will create three-way merge commit)
git merge feature-login --no-edit | Out-Null
$dbContent = @"
# database.py - Database operations
# ============================================================================
# PHASE 4: Create conflict scenario (what students will do in checkpoint 3)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "Phase 4: Creating merge conflict scenario..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
class Database:
def __init__(self):
self.connection = None
# Create config.json file on main
$initialConfig = @"
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000
}
}
def connect(self):
"""Connect to database."""
print("Connecting to database...")
self.connection = True
def query(self, sql):
"""Execute SQL query."""
print(f"Executing: {sql}")
return []
"@
Set-Content -Path "config.json" -Value $initialConfig
git add config.json
git commit -m "Add initial configuration" | Out-Null
Set-Content -Path "database.py" -Value $dbContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add database module" | Out-Null
# On main branch: Add timeout setting
$mainConfig = @"
$dbContent = @"
# database.py - Database operations
class Database:
def __init__(self):
self.connection = None
def connect(self):
"""Connect to database."""
print("Connecting to database...")
self.connection = True
def disconnect(self):
"""Disconnect from database."""
print("Disconnecting from database...")
self.connection = None
def query(self, sql):
"""Execute SQL query."""
print(f"Executing: {sql}")
return []
"@
Set-Content -Path "database.py" -Value $dbContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add disconnect method" | Out-Null
# Switch to main branch and add another commit (to create divergent history)
git switch $mainBranch | Out-Null
$configContent = @"
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000,
"timeout": 5000
"debug": false
}
}
"@
Set-Content -Path "config.json" -Value $mainConfig
git add config.json
git commit -m "Add timeout configuration" | Out-Null
Set-Content -Path "config.json" -Value $configContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add configuration file" | Out-Null
# Create update-config branch from the commit before timeout was added
git switch -c update-config HEAD~1 | Out-Null
# Merge feature-database (will be three-way merge since main diverged)
Write-Host "Merging feature-database into $mainBranch..." -ForegroundColor Green
git merge feature-database --no-edit | Out-Null
# On update-config branch: Add debug setting (conflicting change)
$featureConfig = @"
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000,
"debug": true
}
}
# Final update on main
$readmeContent = @"
# My Application
A sample application for learning Git branching and merging.
## Features
- User authentication
- API endpoints
- Database operations
- Main application logic
## Setup
Run: python app.py
## Requirements
- Python 3.6+
"@
Set-Content -Path "config.json" -Value $featureConfig
git add config.json
git commit -m "Add debug mode configuration" | Out-Null
# Switch back to main
git switch main | Out-Null
# Tag checkpoint-merge-conflict (students begin conflict resolution here - on main with timeout, update-config has debug)
Write-Host "Creating checkpoint: merge-conflict" -ForegroundColor Green
git tag checkpoint-merge-conflict
# ============================================================================
# Reset to checkpoint-start so students begin at the beginning
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nResetting to checkpoint-start..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
git reset --hard checkpoint-start | Out-Null
git clean -fd | Out-Null
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readmeContent
git add .
git commit -m "Update README with all features" | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n=== Setup Complete! ===" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYour challenge environment is ready in the 'challenge/' directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nThis module uses a CHECKPOINT SYSTEM:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " You'll work through 3 sections in one continuous repository:" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 1. Branching Basics (checkpoint: start)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Merging Branches (checkpoint: merge)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Resolving Merge Conflicts (checkpoint: merge-conflict)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nCommands:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " .\reset.ps1 - Show available checkpoints" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " .\reset.ps1 start - Jump to branching section" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " .\reset.ps1 merge - Jump to merging section" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " .\verify.ps1 - Verify all sections complete" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " .\verify.ps1 start - Verify only branching section" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nThe repository contains a realistic project history:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " - Multiple feature branches (login, api, database)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - All branches have been merged into $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - View the history: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nNext steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. Read the README.md for detailed instructions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Start with Checkpoint 1: Branching Basics" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Explore the repository history: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Create your own branches and practice merging!" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""

View File

@@ -1,34 +1,15 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the Module 03 challenge solution (checkpoint-aware).
Verifies the Module 03 challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
This script can verify completion of individual checkpoints or
the entire module. Without arguments, it verifies all checkpoints.
.PARAMETER Checkpoint
The checkpoint to verify: start, merge, or merge-conflict.
If not specified, verifies all checkpoints.
.EXAMPLE
.\verify.ps1
Verifies all three checkpoints are complete.
.EXAMPLE
.\verify.ps1 start
Verifies only the branching basics checkpoint.
.EXAMPLE
.\verify.ps1 merge
Verifies only the merging checkpoint.
This script checks that you've practiced branching and merging by:
- Creating at least one new branch (beyond the example branches)
- Making commits on your branch
- Merging your branch into main
#>
param(
[ValidateSet('start', 'merge', 'merge-conflict', '')]
[string]$Checkpoint = ''
)
$script:allChecksPassed = $true
# ============================================================================
@@ -51,198 +32,15 @@ function Write-Hint {
Write-Host "[HINT] $Message" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# ============================================================================
# Checkpoint 1: Branching Basics Verification
# ============================================================================
function Verify-Branching {
Write-Host "`n=== Checkpoint 1: Branching Basics ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Save current branch
$originalBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
# Check if feature-login branch exists
$branchExists = git branch --list "feature-login" 2>$null
if ($branchExists) {
Write-Pass "Branch 'feature-login' exists"
} else {
Write-Fail "Branch 'feature-login' not found"
Write-Hint "Create the branch with: git switch -c feature-login"
return
}
# Check if feature-login has commits beyond main (or if they've been merged)
$commitCount = git rev-list main..feature-login --count 2>$null
$mergeCommitExists = (git log --merges --oneline 2>$null | Select-String "Merge.*feature-login")
if ($mergeCommitExists -and $commitCount -eq 0) {
# Commits were merged into main - this is correct!
Write-Pass "Branch 'feature-login' commits have been merged into main"
} elseif ($commitCount -ge 2) {
Write-Pass "Branch 'feature-login' has $commitCount new commits"
} else {
Write-Fail "Branch 'feature-login' needs at least 2 new commits (found: $commitCount)"
Write-Hint "Make sure you've committed login.py and made at least one more commit"
}
# Switch to feature-login and check for login.py
git switch feature-login 2>$null | Out-Null
if (Test-Path "login.py") {
Write-Pass "File 'login.py' exists in feature-login branch"
} else {
Write-Fail "File 'login.py' not found in feature-login branch"
Write-Hint "Create login.py and commit it to the feature-login branch"
}
# Switch to main and verify login.py doesn't exist there yet (unless merged)
git switch main 2>$null | Out-Null
# Check if merge happened - if so, login.py can exist on main
$mergeCommitExists = (git log --merges --oneline 2>$null | Select-String "Merge.*feature-login")
if (-not $mergeCommitExists) {
# No merge yet - login.py should NOT be on main
if (-not (Test-Path "login.py")) {
Write-Pass "File 'login.py' does NOT exist in main branch (branches are independent!)"
} else {
Write-Fail "File 'login.py' should not exist in main branch yet (before merge)"
Write-Hint "Make sure you created login.py only on the feature-login branch"
}
}
# Switch back to original branch
if ($originalBranch) {
git switch $originalBranch 2>$null | Out-Null
}
function Write-Info {
param([string]$Message)
Write-Host "[INFO] $Message" -ForegroundColor Cyan
}
# ============================================================================
# Checkpoint 2: Merging Verification
# Check challenge directory exists
# ============================================================================
function Verify-Merging {
Write-Host "`n=== Checkpoint 2: Merging Branches ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check current branch is main
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -eq "main") {
Write-Pass "Currently on main branch"
} else {
Write-Fail "Should be on main branch (currently on: $currentBranch)"
Write-Hint "Switch to main with: git switch main"
}
# Check if login.py exists on main (indicates merge happened)
if (Test-Path "login.py") {
Write-Pass "File 'login.py' exists on main branch (merged successfully)"
} else {
Write-Fail "File 'login.py' not found on main branch"
Write-Hint "Merge feature-login into main with: git merge feature-login"
}
# Check for merge commit
$mergeCommitExists = (git log --merges --oneline 2>$null | Select-String "Merge.*feature-login")
if ($mergeCommitExists) {
Write-Pass "Merge commit exists"
} else {
Write-Fail "No merge commit found"
Write-Hint "Create a merge commit with: git merge feature-login"
}
# Check commit count (should have both branches' commits)
$commitCount = [int](git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null)
if ($commitCount -ge 6) {
Write-Pass "Repository has $commitCount commits (merge complete)"
} else {
Write-Fail "Repository should have at least 6 commits after merge (found: $commitCount)"
}
}
# ============================================================================
# Checkpoint 3: Merge Conflicts Verification
# ============================================================================
function Verify-MergeConflicts {
Write-Host "`n=== Checkpoint 3: Resolving Merge Conflicts ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check current branch is main
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -eq "main") {
Write-Pass "Currently on main branch"
} else {
Write-Fail "Should be on main branch (currently on: $currentBranch)"
Write-Hint "Switch to main with: git switch main"
}
# Check that merge is not in progress
if (Test-Path ".git/MERGE_HEAD") {
Write-Fail "Merge is still in progress (conflicts not resolved)"
Write-Hint "Resolve conflicts in config.json, then: git add config.json && git commit"
return
} else {
Write-Pass "No merge in progress (conflicts resolved)"
}
# Check if config.json exists
if (Test-Path "config.json") {
Write-Pass "File 'config.json' exists"
} else {
Write-Fail "File 'config.json' not found"
Write-Hint "Merge update-config branch with: git merge update-config"
return
}
# Verify config.json is valid JSON
try {
$configContent = Get-Content "config.json" -Raw
$config = $configContent | ConvertFrom-Json -ErrorAction Stop
Write-Pass "File 'config.json' is valid JSON"
} catch {
Write-Fail "File 'config.json' is not valid JSON"
Write-Hint "Make sure you removed all conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>)"
return
}
# Check for conflict markers
if ($configContent -match '<<<<<<<|=======|>>>>>>>') {
Write-Fail "Conflict markers still present in config.json"
Write-Hint "Remove all conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>)"
return
} else {
Write-Pass "No conflict markers in config.json"
}
# Verify both settings are present (timeout and debug)
if ($config.app.timeout -eq 5000) {
Write-Pass "Timeout setting preserved (5000)"
} else {
Write-Fail "Timeout setting missing or incorrect"
Write-Hint "Keep the timeout: 5000 setting from main branch"
}
if ($config.app.debug -eq $true) {
Write-Pass "Debug setting preserved (true)"
} else {
Write-Fail "Debug setting missing or incorrect"
Write-Hint "Keep the debug: true setting from update-config branch"
}
# Verify merge commit exists for update-config
$updateConfigMerge = (git log --merges --oneline 2>$null | Select-String "Merge.*update-config")
if ($updateConfigMerge) {
Write-Pass "Merge commit exists for update-config branch"
} else {
Write-Fail "No merge commit found for update-config"
Write-Hint "Complete the merge with: git commit (after resolving conflicts)"
}
}
# ============================================================================
# Main Script Logic
# ============================================================================
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "challenge")) {
Write-Host "[ERROR] Challenge directory not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Run .\setup.ps1 first to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Yellow
@@ -251,7 +49,6 @@ if (-not (Test-Path "challenge")) {
Push-Location "challenge"
# Check if git repository exists
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[ERROR] Not a git repository." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Run ..\setup.ps1 first to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Yellow
@@ -259,62 +56,122 @@ if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
exit 1
}
# Run appropriate verification
if ($Checkpoint -eq '') {
# Verify all checkpoints
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying All Checkpoints ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying Module 03: Branching and Merging ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Verify-Branching
Verify-Merging
Verify-MergeConflicts
} else {
# Verify specific checkpoint
switch ($Checkpoint) {
'start' { Verify-Branching }
'merge' { Verify-Merging }
'merge-conflict' { Verify-MergeConflicts }
# ============================================================================
# Detect the main branch name (could be main, master, etc.)
# ============================================================================
# Try to get the default branch from remote origin first
$mainBranch = git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>$null | Split-Path -Leaf
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Fallback: try to detect from local branches
$allBranches = git branch --list 2>$null | ForEach-Object { $_.Trim('* ') }
if ($allBranches -contains "main") {
$mainBranch = "main"
} elseif ($allBranches -contains "master") {
$mainBranch = "master"
} else {
# Get the default branch from git config
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Ultimate fallback: use the first branch
$mainBranch = $allBranches | Select-Object -First 1
if (-not $mainBranch) { $mainBranch = "main" }
}
}
}
Write-Host "Detected main branch: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# ============================================================================
# Count initial setup commits (should be 15 commits from setup)
# ============================================================================
$initialCommitCount = 15
# ============================================================================
# Check for new commits beyond setup
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nChecking your work..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
$totalCommits = [int](git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null)
if ($totalCommits -gt $initialCommitCount) {
$newCommits = $totalCommits - $initialCommitCount
Write-Pass "Found $newCommits new commit(s) beyond the initial setup"
} else {
Write-Fail "No new commits found"
Write-Hint "Create a branch, make some commits, and merge it into main"
Write-Hint "Example: git switch -c my-feature"
}
# ============================================================================
# Check for branches (excluding the example branches)
# ============================================================================
$allBranches = git branch --list 2>$null | ForEach-Object { $_.Trim('* ') }
$exampleBranches = @($mainBranch, 'feature-login', 'feature-api', 'feature-database')
$studentBranches = $allBranches | Where-Object { $_ -notin $exampleBranches }
if ($studentBranches.Count -gt 0) {
Write-Pass "Created $($studentBranches.Count) new branch(es): $($studentBranches -join ', ')"
} else {
Write-Info "No new branches found (it's OK if you deleted them after merging)"
Write-Hint "To practice: git switch -c your-branch-name"
}
# ============================================================================
# Check for merge commits by the student
# ============================================================================
$setupUser = "Workshop Student"
$mergeCommits = git log --merges --format="%s" 2>$null
# Count how many merge commits exist beyond the initial 3
$totalMerges = ($mergeCommits | Measure-Object).Count
$setupMerges = 3 # feature-login, feature-api, feature-database
if ($totalMerges -gt $setupMerges) {
$studentMerges = $totalMerges - $setupMerges
Write-Pass "Performed $studentMerges merge(s) of your own work"
} else {
Write-Fail "No merge commits found beyond the example merges"
Write-Hint "Create a branch, add commits, then merge it: git merge your-branch-name"
}
# ============================================================================
# Check current branch
# ============================================================================
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -eq $mainBranch) {
Write-Pass "Currently on $mainBranch branch"
} else {
Write-Info "Currently on '$currentBranch' branch"
Write-Hint "Typically you merge feature branches INTO $mainBranch"
}
Pop-Location
# ============================================================================
# Final summary
# ============================================================================
Write-Host ""
if ($script:allChecksPassed) {
Write-Host "=========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host " CONGRATULATIONS! CHALLENGE PASSED!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "=========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
if ($Checkpoint -eq '') {
Write-Host "`nYou've completed the entire module!" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "You've mastered:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " ✓ Creating and working with branches" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Merging branches together" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Resolving merge conflicts" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nReady for the next module!" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "`nCheckpoint '$Checkpoint' complete!" -ForegroundColor Cyan
switch ($Checkpoint) {
'start' {
Write-Host "Next: Move to the merging checkpoint" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ..\reset.ps1 merge OR continue to merge feature-login" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
'merge' {
Write-Host "Next: Move to the conflict resolution checkpoint" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ..\reset.ps1 merge-conflict" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
'merge-conflict' {
Write-Host "Module complete! Ready for the next module!" -ForegroundColor Green
}
}
}
Write-Host "`nYou've successfully practiced:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " ✓ Creating branches" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Making commits on branches" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Merging branches together" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nReady for the next module!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host ""
exit 0
} else {
Write-Host "[SUMMARY] Some checks failed. Review the hints above and try again." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[INFO] You can run this verification script as many times as needed." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "[SUMMARY] Some checks failed. Review the hints above." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Quick guide:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. Create a branch: git switch -c my-feature" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Make changes and commit them" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Switch to $mainBranch : git switch $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Merge your branch: git merge my-feature" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 5. Run this verify script again" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
exit 1
}

View File

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
# Module 09: Cherry-Pick
## Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will:
- Understand what cherry-picking is and how it works
- Know when to use cherry-pick vs merge or rebase
- Apply specific commits from one branch to another
- Handle cherry-pick conflicts if they occur
- Understand common use cases for cherry-picking
## Challenge Description
You have a `development` branch with several commits. Some of these commits are bug fixes that need to be applied to the `main` branch immediately, but other commits are experimental features that shouldn't be merged yet.
Your task is to:
1. Review the commits on the development branch
2. Identify which commits are bug fixes
3. Cherry-pick only the bug fix commits to the main branch
4. Verify that main has the bug fixes but not the experimental features
## Key Concepts
### What is Cherry-Pick?
Cherry-pick allows you to apply a specific commit from one branch to another. Instead of merging an entire branch, you can selectively choose individual commits.
```
A---B---C---D development
/
E---F main
```
After cherry-picking commit C:
```
A---B---C---D development
/
E---F---C' main
```
Note that C' is a new commit with the same changes as C but a different commit hash.
### Cherry-Pick vs Merge vs Rebase
- **Merge**: Brings all commits from another branch and creates a merge commit
- **Rebase**: Replays all commits from your branch on top of another branch
- **Cherry-Pick**: Applies one or more specific commits to your current branch
### When to Use Cherry-Pick
Cherry-pick is useful when you:
- Need a bug fix from a feature branch but can't merge the whole branch yet
- Want to apply a specific commit to a release branch
- Need to backport a fix to an older version
- Made a commit on the wrong branch and need to move it
- Want to duplicate a commit across multiple branches
### Cherry-Pick Creates New Commits
Important: Cherry-picked commits are new commits with different hashes. The original commit remains on the source branch, and a copy is created on the target branch with the same changes but a different commit ID.
## Useful Commands
```bash
# View commits on another branch
git log <branch-name> --oneline
# View a specific commit's details
git show <commit-hash>
# Cherry-pick a single commit
git cherry-pick <commit-hash>
# Cherry-pick multiple commits
git cherry-pick <commit-hash1> <commit-hash2>
# Cherry-pick a range of commits
git cherry-pick <start-hash>..<end-hash>
# If conflicts occur during cherry-pick:
# 1. Resolve conflicts in files
# 2. Stage the resolved files
git add <file>
# 3. Continue the cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --continue
# Abort a cherry-pick if something goes wrong
git cherry-pick --abort
# View commit history graph
git log --oneline --graph --all
```
## Verification
Run the verification script to check your solution:
```bash
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification will check that:
- You're on the main branch
- The security bug fix commit has been applied to main
- The performance bug fix commit has been applied to main
- The experimental features are NOT on main
- The commits were cherry-picked (not merged)
## Challenge Steps
1. Navigate to the challenge directory
2. You're currently on the development branch
3. View the commits: `git log --oneline`
4. You'll see several commits - identify the bug fixes
5. Switch to main branch: `git switch main`
6. Cherry-pick the bug fix commits (you'll need their commit hashes)
7. Verify the result with `git log --oneline`
8. Run the verification script
## Tips
- Use `git log development --oneline` to see commits on the development branch
- Use `git show <hash>` to view details of a specific commit
- You can cherry-pick by commit hash - you only need the first 7 characters
- Cherry-pick commits in chronological order (oldest first) to avoid conflicts
- If you make a mistake, use `.\reset.ps1` to start over
- The commit message will be preserved when cherry-picking
## Common Cherry-Pick Scenarios
### Hotfix to Production
You have a critical bug fix on a development branch that needs to go to production immediately:
```bash
git switch production
git cherry-pick <bugfix-commit-hash>
```
### Wrong Branch
You accidentally committed on the wrong branch:
```bash
# On wrong branch, note the commit hash
git log --oneline
# Switch to correct branch
git switch correct-branch
git cherry-pick <commit-hash>
# Go back and remove from wrong branch
git switch wrong-branch
git reset --hard HEAD~1
```
### Backporting
You need to apply a fix to an older release branch:
```bash
git switch release-2.0
git cherry-pick <fix-from-main>
```
## What You'll Learn
Cherry-pick is a surgical tool in your Git toolbox. While merge and rebase work with entire branches, cherry-pick lets you be selective about which changes to apply. This is invaluable for managing hotfixes, maintaining multiple release branches, and handling situations where you need specific changes without bringing along everything else. Understanding when to use cherry-pick versus other Git operations is a mark of Git expertise.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,487 @@
# Module 04: Merge Conflicts
## Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will:
- Understand what merge conflicts are and why they occur
- Use `git diff` to discover changes between branches
- Identify merge conflicts in your repository
- Read and interpret conflict markers (`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, `>>>>>>>`)
- Resolve merge conflicts manually
- Complete a merge after resolving conflicts
## Setup
Create the challenge environment:
```bash
.\setup.ps1
```
This creates a repository with two feature branches that have conflicting changes.
## Overview
A **merge conflict** occurs when Git cannot automatically combine changes because both branches modified the same part of the same file in different ways.
**When do conflicts happen?**
- ✅ Two branches modify the same lines in a file
- ✅ One branch deletes a file that another branch modifies
- ✅ Complex changes Git can't merge automatically
- ❌ Different files are changed (no conflict!)
- ❌ Different parts of the same file are changed (no conflict!)
**Don't fear conflicts!** They're a normal part of collaborative development. Git just needs your help to decide what the final code should look like.
## Your Task
### Part 1: Discover the Changes
Before merging, it's good practice to see what each branch changed:
```bash
cd challenge
# Check which branch you're on
git branch
# View all branches
git branch --all
```
You'll see three branches: `main`, `add-timeout`, and `add-debug`.
**Discover what each branch changed:**
```bash
# Compare main with add-timeout
git diff main add-timeout
# Compare main with add-debug
git diff main add-debug
# Compare the two feature branches directly
git diff add-timeout add-debug
```
**What did you discover?**
- Both branches modified `config.json`
- They both added a line in the same location (after `"port": 3000`)
- One adds `"timeout": 5000`
- The other adds `"debug": true`
This is a recipe for a conflict!
### Part 2: Merge the First Branch (No Conflict)
Let's merge `add-timeout` first:
```bash
# Make sure you're on main
git switch main
# Merge the first branch
git merge add-timeout
```
**Success!** This merge works because main hasn't changed since add-timeout was created.
```bash
# View the updated config
cat config.json
# Check the history
git log --oneline --graph --all
```
### Part 3: Try to Merge the Second Branch (Conflict!)
Now let's try to merge `add-debug`:
```bash
# Still on main
git merge add-debug
```
💥 **Boom!** You'll see:
```
Auto-merging config.json
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in config.json
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
```
**Don't panic!** This is expected. Git is asking for your help.
### Part 4: Check the Status
```bash
git status
```
You'll see:
```
On branch main
You have unmerged paths.
(fix conflicts and run "git commit")
(use "git merge --abort" to abort the merge)
Unmerged paths:
(use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
both modified: config.json
```
This tells you that `config.json` needs your attention!
### Part 5: Open and Examine the Conflicted File
Open `config.json` in your text editor:
```bash
# On Windows
notepad config.json
# Or use VS Code
code config.json
```
You'll see special **conflict markers**:
```json
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000,
<<<<<<< HEAD
"timeout": 5000
=======
"debug": true
>>>>>>> add-debug
}
}
```
### Part 6: Understand the Conflict Markers
Let's break down what you're seeing:
```
<<<<<<< HEAD
"timeout": 5000 ← Your current branch (main, which has add-timeout merged)
=======
"debug": true ← The branch you're merging (add-debug)
>>>>>>> add-debug
```
**What each marker means:**
- `<<<<<<< HEAD` - Start of your changes (current branch)
- `=======` - Separator between the two versions
- `>>>>>>> add-debug` - End of their changes (branch being merged)
### Part 7: Resolve the Conflict
You have three options:
**Option 1: Keep ONLY your changes (timeout)**
```json
"timeout": 5000
```
**Option 2: Keep ONLY their changes (debug)**
```json
"debug": true
```
**Option 3: Keep BOTH changes****Do this!**
```json
"timeout": 5000,
"debug": true
```
### Part 8: Edit the File
For this challenge, we want **both settings**, so:
1. Delete ALL the conflict markers:
- Remove `<<<<<<< HEAD`
- Remove `=======`
- Remove `>>>>>>> add-debug`
2. Keep both settings:
**Before (with conflict markers):**
```json
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000,
<<<<<<< HEAD
"timeout": 5000
=======
"debug": true
>>>>>>> add-debug
}
}
```
**After (resolved):**
```json
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000,
"timeout": 5000,
"debug": true
}
}
```
**Important:**
- Remove ALL markers
- Add a comma after `"timeout": 5000` (for valid JSON)
- Ensure the file is valid JSON
3. Save the file
### Part 9: Mark the Conflict as Resolved
Tell Git you've resolved the conflict:
```bash
# Stage the resolved file
git add config.json
# Check status
git status
```
You should see:
```
On branch main
All conflicts fixed but you are still merging.
(use "git commit" to conclude merge)
```
Perfect! Git confirms the conflict is resolved.
### Part 10: Complete the Merge
Commit the merge:
```bash
git commit
```
Git will open an editor with a default merge message. You can accept it or customize it, then save and close.
**Done!** Your merge is complete!
```bash
# View the final result
cat config.json
# View the history
git log --oneline --graph --all
```
You should see both `timeout` and `debug` in the config!
### Part 11: Verify Your Solution
From the module directory (not inside challenge/):
```bash
.\verify.ps1
```
## Understanding Conflict Markers
### Anatomy of a Conflict
```
<<<<<<< HEAD ← Marker: Start of your version
Your changes here
======= ← Marker: Separator
Their changes here
>>>>>>> branch-name ← Marker: End of their version
```
### Common Conflict Patterns
**Simple conflict:**
```
<<<<<<< HEAD
print("Hello")
=======
print("Hi")
>>>>>>> feature
```
Decision: Which greeting do you want?
**Both are needed:**
```
<<<<<<< HEAD
timeout: 5000
=======
debug: true
>>>>>>> feature
```
Decision: Keep both (add comma)!
**Deletion conflict:**
```
<<<<<<< HEAD
# Function deleted on your branch
=======
def old_function():
pass
>>>>>>> feature
```
Decision: Delete or keep the function?
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
**Forgetting to remove conflict markers**
```json
<<<<<<< HEAD Don't leave these in!
"timeout": 5000,
"debug": true
>>>>>>> add-debug Don't leave these in!
```
This breaks your code! Always remove ALL markers.
**Committing without staging**
```bash
git commit # Error! You didn't add the file
```
Always `git add` the resolved file first!
**Keeping only one side when both are needed**
If you delete one setting, you lose that work!
**Breaking syntax**
```json
"timeout": 5000 Missing comma!
"debug": true
```
Always verify your file is valid after resolving!
**Not testing the result**
Always check that your resolved code works!
## Aborting a Merge
Changed your mind? You can abort the merge anytime before committing:
```bash
git merge --abort
```
This returns your repository to the state before you started the merge. No harm done!
## Key Commands
```bash
# Discover changes before merging
git diff branch1 branch2
# Attempt a merge
git merge <branch-name>
# Check which files have conflicts
git status
# Abort the merge and start over
git merge --abort
# After resolving conflicts:
git add <resolved-file>
git commit
# View conflicts in a different style
git diff --ours # Your changes
git diff --theirs # Their changes
git diff --base # Original version
```
## Pro Tips
💡 **Use `git diff` first**
Always compare branches before merging:
```bash
git diff main..feature-branch
```
💡 **Prevent conflicts**
- Pull changes frequently
- Communicate with your team about who's working on what
- Keep branches short-lived and merge often
💡 **Make conflicts easier**
- Work on different files when possible
- Make small, focused commits
- If editing the same file, coordinate with teammates
💡 **When stuck**
- Read the conflict markers carefully
- Look at `git log` to understand what each side changed
- Use `git diff` to see the changes
- Ask a teammate to review your resolution
- Use a merge tool: `git mergetool`
## Merge Tools
Git supports visual merge tools that make resolving conflicts easier:
```bash
# Configure a merge tool (one-time setup)
git config --global merge.tool vscode # or meld, kdiff3, etc.
# Use the merge tool during a conflict
git mergetool
```
This opens a visual interface showing both versions side-by-side.
## Real-World Scenario
This exercise simulates a common real-world situation:
**Scenario:** Two developers working on the same file
- Alice adds a timeout configuration
- Bob adds debug mode configuration
- Both push their changes
- When Bob tries to merge, he gets a conflict
- Bob resolves it by keeping both changes
- Everyone's work is preserved!
This happens all the time in team development. Conflicts are normal!
## What You've Learned
After completing this module, you understand:
- ✅ Merge conflicts happen when the same lines are changed differently
-`git diff` helps you discover changes before merging
- ✅ Conflict markers show both versions
- ✅ You decide what the final code should look like
- ✅ Remove all markers before committing
- ✅ Test your resolution to ensure it works
- ✅ Conflicts are normal and easy to resolve with practice
## Next Steps
Ready to continue? The next module covers **cherry-picking** - selectively applying specific commits from one branch to another.
To start over:
```bash
.\reset.ps1
.\setup.ps1
```
**Need help?** Review the steps above, or run `git status` to see what Git suggests!

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the Module 04 challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
This script removes the challenge directory, allowing you to start fresh.
Run setup.ps1 again after resetting to recreate the environment.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Resetting Module 04 Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
Write-Host "`n[SUCCESS] Challenge environment reset complete!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nRun .\setup.ps1 to create a fresh challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host ""
} else {
Write-Host "`n[INFO] No challenge directory found. Nothing to reset." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Run .\setup.ps1 to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host ""
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the Module 04 challenge environment for merge conflicts.
.DESCRIPTION
This script creates a challenge directory with a Git repository containing
two feature branches that have conflicting changes to the same file.
Students will learn to identify, understand, and resolve merge conflicts.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Setting up Module 04: Merge Conflicts ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Remove existing challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
}
# Create fresh challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Green
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize Git repository
Write-Host "Initializing Git repository..." -ForegroundColor Green
git init | Out-Null
# Configure git for this repository
git config user.name "Workshop Student"
git config user.email "student@example.com"
# Detect the default branch name (could be main, master, etc.)
# First commit creates the branch, so we detect it after that
$mainBranch = git branch --show-current
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Fallback: Get default branch name from git config
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Ultimate fallback: use "main"
$mainBranch = "main"
}
}
Write-Host "Default branch detected: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
# ============================================================================
# Create base project
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "Creating base project..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Initial commit with config file
$configContent = @"
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000
}
}
"@
Set-Content -Path "config.json" -Value $configContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit with config" | Out-Null
# Add README
$readmeContent = @"
# My Application
A simple application for learning merge conflicts.
## Configuration
Edit `config.json` to configure the application.
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readmeContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add README" | Out-Null
# ============================================================================
# Branch 1: add-timeout (adds timeout setting)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "Creating add-timeout branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch -c add-timeout | Out-Null
$timeoutConfig = @"
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000,
"timeout": 5000
}
}
"@
Set-Content -Path "config.json" -Value $timeoutConfig
git add .
git commit -m "Add timeout configuration" | Out-Null
# ============================================================================
# Branch 2: add-debug (adds debug setting - CONFLICTS with timeout!)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "Creating add-debug branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch $mainBranch | Out-Null
git switch -c add-debug | Out-Null
$debugConfig = @"
{
"app": {
"name": "MyApp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"port": 3000,
"debug": true
}
}
"@
Set-Content -Path "config.json" -Value $debugConfig
git add .
git commit -m "Add debug mode configuration" | Out-Null
# Switch back to main branch
git switch $mainBranch | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n=== Setup Complete! ===" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYour challenge environment is ready in the 'challenge/' directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nThe repository contains:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " - $mainBranch branch: base configuration" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - add-timeout branch: adds timeout setting" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - add-debug branch: adds debug setting" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nBoth branches modify the same part of config.json!" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "This will cause a merge conflict when you try to merge both." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "`nNext steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. Read the README.md for detailed instructions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Follow the guide to discover and resolve the conflict" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the Module 04 challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
This script checks that you've successfully resolved the merge conflict by:
- Merging both branches into main
- Resolving the conflict in config.json
- Keeping both timeout and debug settings
- Ensuring valid JSON syntax
#>
$script:allChecksPassed = $true
# ============================================================================
# Helper Functions
# ============================================================================
function Write-Pass {
param([string]$Message)
Write-Host "[PASS] $Message" -ForegroundColor Green
}
function Write-Fail {
param([string]$Message)
Write-Host "[FAIL] $Message" -ForegroundColor Red
$script:allChecksPassed = $false
}
function Write-Hint {
param([string]$Message)
Write-Host "[HINT] $Message" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
function Write-Info {
param([string]$Message)
Write-Host "[INFO] $Message" -ForegroundColor Cyan
}
# ============================================================================
# Check challenge directory exists
# ============================================================================
if (-not (Test-Path "challenge")) {
Write-Host "[ERROR] Challenge directory not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Run .\setup.ps1 first to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Yellow
exit 1
}
Push-Location "challenge"
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[ERROR] Not a git repository." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Run ..\setup.ps1 first to create the challenge environment." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Pop-Location
exit 1
}
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying Module 04: Merge Conflicts ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# ============================================================================
# Detect the main branch name (could be main, master, etc.)
# ============================================================================
# Try to get the default branch from remote origin first
$mainBranch = git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>$null | Split-Path -Leaf
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Fallback: try to detect from local branches
$allBranches = git branch --list 2>$null | ForEach-Object { $_.Trim('* ') }
if ($allBranches -contains "main") {
$mainBranch = "main"
} elseif ($allBranches -contains "master") {
$mainBranch = "master"
} else {
# Get the default branch from git config
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) {
# Ultimate fallback: use the first branch
$mainBranch = $allBranches | Select-Object -First 1
if (-not $mainBranch) { $mainBranch = "main" }
}
}
}
Write-Host "Detected main branch: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# ============================================================================
# Check current branch
# ============================================================================
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -eq $mainBranch) {
Write-Pass "Currently on $mainBranch branch"
} else {
Write-Fail "Should be on $mainBranch branch (currently on: $currentBranch)"
Write-Hint "Switch to $mainBranch with: git switch $mainBranch"
}
# ============================================================================
# Check that merge is not in progress
# ============================================================================
if (Test-Path ".git/MERGE_HEAD") {
Write-Fail "Merge is still in progress (conflicts not resolved)"
Write-Hint "Resolve conflicts in config.json, then: git add config.json && git commit"
Pop-Location
exit 1
} else {
Write-Pass "No merge in progress (conflicts resolved)"
}
# ============================================================================
# Check if config.json exists
# ============================================================================
if (-not (Test-Path "config.json")) {
Write-Fail "File 'config.json' not found"
Write-Hint "The config.json file should exist"
Pop-Location
exit 1
}
# ============================================================================
# Verify config.json is valid JSON
# ============================================================================
try {
$configContent = Get-Content "config.json" -Raw
$config = $configContent | ConvertFrom-Json -ErrorAction Stop
Write-Pass "File 'config.json' is valid JSON"
} catch {
Write-Fail "File 'config.json' is not valid JSON"
Write-Hint "Make sure you removed all conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>)"
Write-Hint "Check for missing commas or brackets"
Pop-Location
exit 1
}
# ============================================================================
# Check for conflict markers
# ============================================================================
if ($configContent -match '<<<<<<<|=======|>>>>>>>') {
Write-Fail "Conflict markers still present in config.json"
Write-Hint "Remove all conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>)"
Pop-Location
exit 1
} else {
Write-Pass "No conflict markers in config.json"
}
# ============================================================================
# Verify both settings are present (timeout and debug)
# ============================================================================
if ($config.app.timeout -eq 5000) {
Write-Pass "Timeout setting preserved (5000)"
} else {
Write-Fail "Timeout setting missing or incorrect"
Write-Hint "Keep the timeout: 5000 setting from add-timeout branch"
}
if ($config.app.debug -eq $true) {
Write-Pass "Debug setting preserved (true)"
} else {
Write-Fail "Debug setting missing or incorrect"
Write-Hint "Keep the debug: true setting from add-debug branch"
}
# ============================================================================
# Verify both branches were merged
# ============================================================================
$addTimeoutMerged = git log --oneline --grep="add-timeout" 2>$null | Select-String "Merge"
$addDebugMerged = git log --oneline --grep="add-debug" 2>$null | Select-String "Merge"
if ($addTimeoutMerged) {
Write-Pass "add-timeout branch has been merged"
} else {
# Check if it was a fast-forward merge (commits exist but no merge commit)
$timeoutCommit = git log --oneline --grep="Add timeout configuration" 2>$null
if ($timeoutCommit) {
Write-Pass "add-timeout branch changes are in main"
} else {
Write-Fail "add-timeout branch not merged"
Write-Hint "Merge with: git merge add-timeout"
}
}
if ($addDebugMerged) {
Write-Pass "add-debug branch has been merged"
} else {
Write-Fail "add-debug branch not merged"
Write-Hint "Merge with: git merge add-debug"
}
# ============================================================================
# Check commit count (should have both merges)
# ============================================================================
$totalCommits = [int](git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null)
if ($totalCommits -ge 5) {
Write-Pass "Repository has $totalCommits commits (all merges complete)"
} else {
Write-Info "Repository has $totalCommits commits"
Write-Hint "Make sure both branches are merged"
}
Pop-Location
# ============================================================================
# Final summary
# ============================================================================
Write-Host ""
if ($script:allChecksPassed) {
Write-Host "=========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host " CONGRATULATIONS! CHALLENGE PASSED!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "=========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou've successfully:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " ✓ Discovered changes using git diff" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Merged the first branch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Encountered a merge conflict" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Resolved the conflict by keeping both changes" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Completed the merge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nYou're now ready to handle merge conflicts in real projects!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host ""
exit 0
} else {
Write-Host "[SUMMARY] Some checks failed. Review the hints above." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Quick guide:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. Make sure you're on $mainBranch : git switch $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Merge first branch: git merge add-timeout" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Merge second branch: git merge add-debug" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Resolve conflict: edit config.json, remove markers, keep both settings" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 5. Stage resolved file: git add config.json" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 6. Complete merge: git commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 7. Run this verify script again" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
exit 1
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
# Module 05: Cherry-Pick
## Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will:
- Understand what cherry-picking is and how it works
- Know when to use cherry-pick vs merge or rebase
- Apply specific commits from one branch to another
- Understand common use cases for cherry-picking
- Learn how cherry-pick creates new commits with different hashes
## Setup
Create the challenge environment:
```pwsh
.\setup.ps1
```
This creates a repository with a `development` branch containing both bug fixes and experimental features.
## Overview
**Cherry-pick** allows you to copy specific commits from one branch to another. Unlike merging (which brings ALL commits), cherry-pick lets you be surgical about exactly which changes you want to apply.
Think of it like picking cherries from a tree - you select only the ripe ones you want, leaving the rest behind.
### Why Use Cherry-Pick?
- **Selective deployment** - Apply critical bug fixes without merging unfinished features
- **Hotfixes** - Quickly move a fix from development to production
- **Backporting** - Apply fixes to older release branches
- **Wrong branch** - Move commits you accidentally made on the wrong branch
- **Duplicate commits** - Apply the same fix across multiple branches
## Your Task
### The Scenario
You're working on a project where:
- The `main` branch is stable and in production
- The `development` branch has new features being tested
- Development has critical bug fixes that need to go to production NOW
- But development also has experimental features that aren't ready yet
You need to cherry-pick ONLY the bug fixes to main, leaving the experimental features behind.
### Part 1: Explore the Development Branch
First, see what commits are on the development branch:
```pwsh
cd challenge
# View all commits on development branch
git log --oneline development
# View the full commit graph
git log --oneline --graph --all
```
**Study the commits:**
- Look for commits with "Fix" in the message (these are bug fixes)
- Look for commits with "experimental" or "beta" (these should stay on development)
- Note the commit hashes (the 7-character codes like `abc1234`)
**Inspect specific commits:**
```pwsh
# See what files a commit changed
git show <commit-hash>
# Example:
# git show abc1234
```
You should see:
- 2 commits that fix bugs (security and performance)
- 2 commits that add experimental features
### Part 2: Switch to Main Branch
Before cherry-picking, you need to be on the target branch (main):
```pwsh
# Switch to main branch
git switch main
# Verify you're on main
git branch
```
The `*` should be next to `main`.
**Check what's currently on main:**
```pwsh
# See main's commits
git log --oneline
# See what files exist
ls
```
Main should only have the initial app and README - no bug fixes yet, no experimental features.
### Part 3: Cherry-Pick the Bug Fixes
Now copy the bug fix commits from development to main:
1. Find the security fix commit hash by looking at your earlier `git log --oneline --graph --all`
- Look for a commit message like "Fix security vulnerability in input validation"
- Note its hash (first 7 characters)
2. Cherry-pick the security fix:
```pwsh
git cherry-pick <security-fix-hash>
# Example if the hash is abc1234:
# git cherry-pick abc1234
```
3. Verify it worked: Check that security.py, with `ls` or check your file explorer in VSCode, now exists and check that the commit has been added to the main branch with `git log --oneline --graph --all`
4. Find the performance fix commit hash
- Look for "Fix performance issue with data caching"
- Note its hash
5. Cherry-pick the performance fix:
```pwsh
git cherry-pick <performance-fix-hash>
```
6. Verify both fixes are now on main:
```pwsh
# You should see both security.py and cache.py
ls
# View the graph showing both branches
git log --oneline --graph --all
```
### Part 4: Verify Your Solution
Check that you completed the challenge correctly:
```pwsh
# From inside the module directory
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification checks:
- ✅ You're on the main branch
- ✅ Security fix is applied to main
- ✅ Performance fix is applied to main
- ✅ Experimental features are NOT on main
- ✅ Development branch still has all commits
## Understanding Cherry-Pick
### What Actually Happens?
When you cherry-pick a commit, Git:
1. Looks at what changed in that specific commit
2. Applies those same changes to your current branch
3. Creates a NEW commit with those changes
```
Before cherry-pick:
development: A---B---C---D
/
main: E---F
After: git switch main && git cherry-pick C
development: A---B---C---D
/
main: E---F---C'
```
Notice:
- `C'` is a NEW commit (different hash than original `C`)
- Original `C` still exists on development
- Main now has the changes from C, but not B or D
### Cherry-Pick vs Merge
**Merge brings everything:**
```pwsh
git switch main
git merge development
# Result: A, B, C, and D all come to main
```
**Cherry-pick is selective:**
```pwsh
git switch main
git cherry-pick C
# Result: Only C comes to main (as C')
```
### Important: New Commits, New Hashes
Cherry-picked commits are COPIES, not moves:
- Original commit stays on source branch
- New commit created on target branch
- Different commit hash (because different parent)
- Same changes, same message, different identity
## Key Commands
### Viewing Commits
```pwsh
# See commits on another branch
git log branch-name --oneline
# See what a specific commit changed
git show <commit-hash>
# See commit graph
git log --oneline --graph --all
# See only commit message (not changes)
git log --oneline
```
### Cherry-Picking
```pwsh
# Cherry-pick a single commit
git cherry-pick <commit-hash>
# Cherry-pick multiple commits (in order)
git cherry-pick <hash1> <hash2> <hash3>
# Cherry-pick a range of commits
git cherry-pick <start-hash>..<end-hash>
# Abort a cherry-pick if something goes wrong
git cherry-pick --abort
```
### After Cherry-Pick
```pwsh
# Verify the commit was added
git log --oneline
# See what files changed
git show HEAD
# Compare branches
git log main..development --oneline
```
## Common Workflows
### Hotfix to Production
Critical bug found in production:
```pwsh
# You're on feature-new-ui branch
# You just committed a critical security fix
git log --oneline
# Note the hash of your fix commit
# Switch to production branch
git switch production
# Apply just that fix
git cherry-pick <fix-commit-hash>
# Deploy to production
# Your fix is live, but new UI stays in development
```
### Backporting to Old Versions
```pwsh
# You fixed a bug on main
git switch main
git log --oneline
# Note the fix commit hash
# Apply to older release branch
git switch release-2.5
git cherry-pick <fix-commit-hash>
# Apply to even older release
git switch release-2.0
git cherry-pick <fix-commit-hash>
# Same fix now on three branches!
```
## Troubleshooting
### "I can't remember the commit hash!"
```pwsh
# See commits on the source branch
git log development --oneline
# Search for specific text in commit messages
git log development --oneline --grep="security"
# See recent commits with more detail
git log development --oneline -n 10
```
### "I cherry-picked in the wrong order!"
Order matters! If commit B depends on commit A, cherry-pick A first:
```pwsh
# Wrong order might cause issues
git cherry-pick B # Might fail if it needs changes from A
# Correct order
git cherry-pick A
git cherry-pick B
```
### "How do I see what will change before cherry-picking?"
```pwsh
# See what changes are in a commit
git show <commit-hash>
# Compare your current branch with a commit
git diff HEAD <commit-hash>
```
## Tips for Success
💡 **Copy the commit hashes** - Write them down before switching branches
💡 **Cherry-pick oldest first** - Apply commits in chronological order
💡 **Check your branch** - Always verify you're on the target branch first with `git branch`
💡 **Verify after each pick** - Run `git log --oneline` to confirm it worked
💡 **Use the graph** - `git log --oneline --graph --all` shows the full picture
💡 **Original stays put** - Cherry-pick copies, doesn't move commits
## What You've Learned
After completing this module, you understand:
- ✅ Cherry-pick copies specific commits between branches
- ✅ `git cherry-pick <hash>` applies a commit to current branch
- ✅ Cherry-picked commits get new hashes but same changes
- ✅ Use cherry-pick for selective deployment of changes
- ✅ Cherry-pick is different from merge (selective vs all)
- ✅ Original commit stays on source branch
## Next Steps
Ready to continue? Cherry-pick is a powerful tool for selective change management. Next modules will cover more advanced Git operations.
To start over:
```pwsh
.\reset.ps1
```
**Need help?** Run `git status` to see what Git suggests, or `git log --oneline --graph --all` to see the full picture!

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ git init | Out-Null
git config user.name "Workshop User" | Out-Null
git config user.email "user@workshop.local" | Out-Null
# Create initial commits on main branch
# Detect the default branch name (could be main, master, etc.)
# First commit creates the branch, so we detect it after the first commit below
$app = @"
class App:
def __init__(self):
@@ -40,6 +41,14 @@ Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $app
git add app.py
git commit -m "Initial app implementation" | Out-Null
# Detect the main branch name after first commit
$mainBranch = git branch --show-current
if (-not $mainBranch) {
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) { $mainBranch = "main" }
}
Write-Host "Default branch detected: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$readme = @"
# Application
@@ -119,40 +128,29 @@ git add app.py
git commit -m "Add beta features framework" | Out-Null
# Commit 4: Performance bug fix (SHOULD be cherry-picked)
$appWithPerformance = @"
class App:
# This commit adds caching to the existing file to fix performance
# It should apply cleanly to main since it doesn't depend on experimental features
$performanceCode = @"
class DataCache:
def __init__(self):
self.version = '1.0.0'
self.experimental_mode = False
self.beta_features = []
self.cache = {}
def start(self):
print('App started')
if self.experimental_mode:
self.enable_experimental_features()
def enable_experimental_features(self):
print('Experimental features enabled')
def add_beta_feature(self, feature):
self.beta_features.append(feature)
def get_data(self, key):
def get(self, key):
# Use cache to improve performance
if key in self.cache:
return self.cache[key]
data = self.fetch_data(key)
self.cache[key] = data
return data
return None
def fetch_data(self, key):
# Simulate data fetching
return {'key': key, 'value': 'data'}
def set(self, key, value):
self.cache[key] = value
def clear(self):
self.cache.clear()
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appWithPerformance
git add app.py
Set-Content -Path "cache.py" -Value $performanceCode
git add cache.py
git commit -m "Fix performance issue with data caching" | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
@@ -164,12 +162,13 @@ Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou are on the 'development' branch with multiple commits:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "- Experimental features (not ready for production)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "- Critical bug fixes (needed in production NOW)" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nDetected main branch: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nYour task:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "1. Navigate to the challenge directory: cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "2. View the development branch commits: git log --oneline" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "3. Identify which commits are bug fixes (look for 'Fix' in messages)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. Switch to main branch: git checkout main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "5. Cherry-pick ONLY the bug fix commits to main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "6. Do NOT bring the experimental features to main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. Switch to $mainBranch branch: git checkout $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "5. Cherry-pick ONLY the bug fix commits to $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "6. Do NOT bring the experimental features to $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nHint: Look for commits mentioning 'security' and 'performance' fixes" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Run '../verify.ps1' from the challenge directory to check your solution.`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan

View File

@@ -32,12 +32,27 @@ if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
exit 1
}
# Detect the main branch name
$allBranches = git branch --list 2>$null | ForEach-Object { $_.Trim('* ') }
if ($allBranches -contains "main") {
$mainBranch = "main"
} elseif ($allBranches -contains "master") {
$mainBranch = "master"
} else {
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) {
$mainBranch = $allBranches | Select-Object -First 1
if (-not $mainBranch) { $mainBranch = "main" }
}
}
Write-Host "Detected main branch: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check current branch
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -ne "main") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] You should be on the 'main' branch." -ForegroundColor Red
if ($currentBranch -ne $mainBranch) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] You should be on the '$mainBranch' branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Current branch: $currentBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Hint: Use 'git checkout main' to switch to main branch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Hint: Use 'git checkout $mainBranch' to switch to $mainBranch branch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
@@ -54,15 +69,15 @@ if (Test-Path ".git/CHERRY_PICK_HEAD") {
}
# Check commit count on main (should be 4: 2 initial + 2 cherry-picked)
$mainCommitCount = (git rev-list --count main 2>$null)
$mainCommitCount = (git rev-list --count $mainBranch 2>$null)
if ($mainCommitCount -ne 4) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Expected 4 commits on main branch, found $mainCommitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[FAIL] Expected 4 commits on $mainBranch branch, found $mainCommitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
if ($mainCommitCount -lt 4) {
Write-Host "Hint: You should cherry-pick 2 bug fix commits to main" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Hint: You should cherry-pick 2 bug fix commits to $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
} else {
Write-Host "Hint: You should cherry-pick ONLY the 2 bug fix commits, not all commits" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
Write-Host "`nExpected commits on main:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nExpected commits on ${mainBranch}:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " 1. Initial app implementation" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Add README" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Fix security vulnerability in input validation (cherry-picked)" -ForegroundColor White
@@ -72,9 +87,9 @@ if ($mainCommitCount -ne 4) {
}
# Check for merge commits (should be none - cherry-pick doesn't create merge commits)
$mergeCommits = git log --merges --oneline main 2>$null
$mergeCommits = git log --merges --oneline $mainBranch 2>$null
if ($mergeCommits) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Found merge commits on main. You should use cherry-pick, not merge." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[FAIL] Found merge commits on $mainBranch. You should use cherry-pick, not merge." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Use 'git cherry-pick <commit-hash>' instead of 'git merge'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
@@ -82,7 +97,7 @@ if ($mergeCommits) {
# Check that security.py exists (from the security fix commit)
if (-not (Test-Path "security.py")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] security.py not found on main branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[FAIL] security.py not found on $mainBranch branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: You need to cherry-pick the 'Fix security vulnerability' commit" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
@@ -110,23 +125,32 @@ if (-not (Test-Path "app.py")) {
exit 1
}
# Check that app.py has the performance fix (cache) but NOT experimental features
$appContent = Get-Content "app.py" -Raw
# Should have cache (from performance fix)
if ($appContent -notmatch "cache") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] app.py is missing the performance fix (cache)." -ForegroundColor Red
# Check that cache.py exists (from performance fix)
if (-not (Test-Path "cache.py")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] cache.py not found on $mainBranch branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: You need to cherry-pick the 'Fix performance issue' commit" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
if ($appContent -notmatch "get_data") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] app.py is missing the get_data method from performance fix." -ForegroundColor Red
# Check that cache.py has the DataCache class
$cacheContent = Get-Content "cache.py" -Raw
if ($cacheContent -notmatch "DataCache") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] cache.py is missing the DataCache class." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
if ($cacheContent -notmatch "def get\(") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] cache.py is missing the get method." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that app.py does NOT have experimental features
$appContent = Get-Content "app.py" -Raw
# Should NOT have experimental features
if ($appContent -match "experimental_mode") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] app.py contains experimental features (experimental_mode)." -ForegroundColor Red
@@ -151,7 +175,7 @@ if ($appContent -match "enable_experimental_features") {
}
# Check commit messages to verify cherry-picks
$commits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" main 2>$null
$commits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" $mainBranch 2>$null
$commitArray = $commits -split "`n"
$hasSecurityFix = $false
@@ -167,14 +191,14 @@ foreach ($commit in $commitArray) {
}
if (-not $hasSecurityFix) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Security fix commit not found on main branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[FAIL] Security fix commit not found on $mainBranch branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Cherry-pick the 'Fix security vulnerability' commit from development" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
if (-not $hasPerformanceFix) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Performance fix commit not found on main branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[FAIL] Performance fix commit not found on $mainBranch branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Cherry-pick the 'Fix performance issue' commit from development" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
@@ -194,8 +218,8 @@ Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "SUCCESS! Challenge completed!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou have successfully:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "- Cherry-picked the security vulnerability fix to main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Cherry-picked the performance issue fix to main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Cherry-picked the security vulnerability fix to $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Cherry-picked the performance issue fix to $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Left experimental features on development branch only" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Kept development branch intact with all commits" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nPerfect use of cherry-pick!" -ForegroundColor Green

View File

@@ -1,638 +0,0 @@
# Module 05: Git Revert - Safe Undoing
## About This Module
Welcome to Module 05, where you'll learn the **safe, team-friendly way to undo changes** in Git. Unlike destructive commands that erase history, `git revert` creates new commits that undo previous changes while preserving the complete project history.
**Why revert is important:**
- ✅ Safe for shared/pushed commits
- ✅ Preserves complete history and audit trail
- ✅ Transparent to your team
- ✅ Can be undone itself if needed
- ✅ Works with any commit in history
**Key principle:** Revert doesn't erase mistakes—it documents how you fixed them.
## Learning Objectives
By completing this module, you will:
1. Revert regular commits safely while preserving surrounding changes
2. Revert merge commits using the `-m` flag
3. Understand merge commit parent numbering
4. Handle the re-merge problem that occurs after reverting merges
5. Revert multiple commits at once
6. Know when to use revert vs. other undo strategies
## Prerequisites
Before starting this module, you should be comfortable with:
- Creating commits (`git commit`)
- Viewing commit history (`git log`)
- Understanding branches and merging (Module 03)
## Setup
Run the setup script to create the challenge environment:
```powershell
./setup.ps1
```
This creates a `challenge/` directory with three branches demonstrating different revert scenarios:
- `regular-revert` - Basic commit reversion
- `merge-revert` - Merge commit reversion
- `multi-revert` - Multiple commit reversion
## Challenge 1: Reverting a Regular Commit
### Scenario
You're working on a calculator application. A developer added a `divide` function that crashes when dividing by zero. The bug was discovered after subsequent commits were made, so you can't just delete it—you need to revert it while keeping the commits that came after.
### Your Task
1. Navigate to the challenge directory:
```bash
cd challenge
```
2. You should be on the `regular-revert` branch. View the commit history:
```bash
git log --oneline
```
3. Find the commit with the broken divide function (message: "Add broken divide function - needs to be reverted!")
4. Revert that specific commit:
```bash
git revert <commit-hash>
```
5. Git will open your editor for the revert commit message. The default message is fine—save and close.
### What to Observe
After reverting, check:
```bash
# View the new revert commit
git log --oneline
# Check that divide function is gone
cat calculator.py | grep "def divide" # Should return nothing
# Check that modulo function still exists (it came after the bad commit)
cat calculator.py | grep "def modulo" # Should find it
# Check that multiply function still exists (it came before the bad commit)
cat calculator.py | grep "def multiply" # Should find it
```
**Key insight:** Revert creates a new commit that undoes the changes from the target commit, but leaves all other commits intact.
### Understanding the Timeline
```
Before revert:
main.py (initial) → multiply (good) → divide (BAD) → modulo (good)
We want to undo THIS
After revert:
main.py (initial) → multiply (good) → divide (BAD) → modulo (good) → revert divide (new commit)
Removes divide, keeps modulo
```
The revert commit adds a new point in history that undoes the divide changes.
## Challenge 2: Reverting a Merge Commit
### Scenario
Your team merged a `feature-auth` branch that added authentication functionality. After deployment, you discovered the authentication system has critical security issues. You need to revert the entire merge while the security team redesigns the feature.
**This is different from reverting a regular commit!** Merge commits have **two parents**, so you must tell Git which parent to keep.
### Understanding Merge Commit Parents
When you merge a feature branch into main:
```
feature-auth (parent 2)
C---D
/ \
A---B-----M ← Merge commit (has TWO parents)
parent 1 (main)
```
The merge commit `M` has:
- **Parent 1**: The branch you merged INTO (main)
- **Parent 2**: The branch you merged FROM (feature-auth)
When reverting a merge, you must specify which parent to keep using the `-m` flag:
- `-m 1` means "keep parent 1" (main) - **Most common**
- `-m 2` means "keep parent 2" (feature-auth) - Rare
**In practice:** You almost always use `-m 1` to keep the main branch and undo the feature branch changes.
### Your Task
1. Switch to the merge-revert branch:
```bash
git switch merge-revert
```
2. View the commit history and find the merge commit:
```bash
git log --oneline --graph
```
Look for: "Merge feature-auth branch"
3. Revert the merge commit using `-m 1`:
```bash
git revert -m 1 <merge-commit-hash>
```
**Explanation:**
- `-m 1` tells Git to keep parent 1 (main branch)
- This undoes all changes from the feature-auth branch
- Creates a new "revert merge" commit
4. Save the default commit message and check the result:
```bash
# Verify auth.py is gone
ls auth.py # Should not exist
# Verify calculator.py no longer imports auth
cat calculator.py | grep "from auth" # Should return nothing
```
### What Happens Without -m?
If you try to revert a merge commit without the `-m` flag:
```bash
git revert <merge-commit-hash>
# Error: commit <hash> is a merge but no -m option was given
```
Git doesn't know which parent you want to keep, so it refuses to proceed.
### The Re-Merge Problem
**Important gotcha:** After reverting a merge, you **cannot simply re-merge** the same branch!
Here's why:
```
Initial merge:
A---B---M (merged feature-auth)
All changes from feature-auth are now in main
After revert:
A---B---M---R (reverted merge)
Changes removed, but Git remembers they were merged
Attempting to re-merge:
A---B---M---R---M2 (try to merge feature-auth again)
Git thinks: "I already merged these commits,
nothing new to add!" (Empty merge)
```
**Solutions if you need to re-merge:**
1. **Revert the revert** (recommended):
```bash
git revert <revert-commit-hash>
```
This brings back all the feature-auth changes.
2. **Cherry-pick new commits** from the feature branch:
```bash
git cherry-pick <new-commits>
```
3. **Merge with --no-ff** and resolve conflicts manually (advanced).
### When to Revert Merges
Revert merge commits when:
- ✅ Feature causes production issues
- ✅ Need to temporarily remove a feature
- ✅ Discovered critical bugs after merging
- ✅ Security issues require immediate rollback
Don't revert merges when:
- ❌ You just need to fix a small bug (fix it with a new commit instead)
- ❌ You plan to re-merge the same branch soon (use reset if local, or revert-the-revert later)
## Challenge 3: Reverting Multiple Commits
### Scenario
Two separate commits added broken mathematical functions (`square_root` and `logarithm`). Both have critical bugs and need to be removed. You can revert multiple commits at once.
### Your Task
1. Switch to the multi-revert branch:
```bash
git switch multi-revert
```
2. View the commit history:
```bash
git log --oneline
```
Find the two commits:
- "Add broken square_root - REVERT THIS!"
- "Add broken logarithm - REVERT THIS TOO!"
3. Revert both commits in one command:
```bash
git revert <commit-hash-1> <commit-hash-2>
```
**Important:** List commits from **oldest to newest** for cleanest history.
Alternatively, revert them one at a time:
```bash
git revert <commit-hash-1>
git revert <commit-hash-2>
```
4. Git will prompt for a commit message for each revert. Accept the defaults.
5. Verify the result:
```bash
# Check that both bad functions are gone
cat calculator.py | grep "def square_root" # Should return nothing
cat calculator.py | grep "def logarithm" # Should return nothing
# Check that good functions remain
cat calculator.py | grep "def power" # Should find it
cat calculator.py | grep "def absolute" # Should find it
```
### Multi-Revert Strategies
**Reverting a range of commits:**
```bash
# Revert commits from A to B (inclusive)
git revert A^..B
# Example: Revert last 3 commits
git revert HEAD~3..HEAD
```
**Reverting without auto-commit:**
```bash
# Stage revert changes without committing
git revert --no-commit <commit-hash>
# Review changes
git diff --staged
# Commit when ready
git commit
```
This is useful when reverting multiple commits and you want one combined revert commit.
## Verification
Verify your solutions by running the verification script:
```bash
cd .. # Return to module directory
./verify.ps1
```
The script checks that:
- ✅ Revert commits were created (not destructive deletion)
- ✅ Bad code is removed
- ✅ Good code before and after is preserved
- ✅ Merge commits still exist in history
- ✅ Proper use of `-m` flag for merge reverts
## Command Reference
### Basic Revert
```bash
# Revert a specific commit
git revert <commit-hash>
# Revert the most recent commit
git revert HEAD
# Revert the second-to-last commit
git revert HEAD~1
```
### Merge Commit Revert
```bash
# Revert a merge commit (keep parent 1)
git revert -m 1 <merge-commit-hash>
# Revert a merge commit (keep parent 2) - rare
git revert -m 2 <merge-commit-hash>
```
### Multiple Commits
```bash
# Revert multiple specific commits
git revert <hash1> <hash2> <hash3>
# Revert a range of commits (oldest^..newest)
git revert <oldest-hash>^..<newest-hash>
# Revert last 3 commits
git revert HEAD~3..HEAD
```
### Revert Options
```bash
# Revert but don't commit automatically
git revert --no-commit <commit-hash>
# Revert and edit the commit message
git revert --edit <commit-hash>
# Revert without opening editor (use default message)
git revert --no-edit <commit-hash>
# Abort a revert in progress (if conflicts)
git revert --abort
# Continue revert after resolving conflicts
git revert --continue
```
## When to Use Git Revert
Use `git revert` when:
- ✅ **Commits are already pushed** - Safe for shared history
- ✅ **Working in a team** - Transparent to everyone
- ✅ **Need audit trail** - Shows what was undone and why
- ✅ **Public repositories** - Can't rewrite public history
- ✅ **Undoing old commits** - Can revert commits from weeks ago
- ✅ **Production hotfixes** - Safe emergency rollback
**Golden Rule:** If others might have your commits, use revert.
## When NOT to Use Git Revert
Consider alternatives when:
- ❌ **Commits are still local** - Use `git reset` instead (Module 06)
- ❌ **Just want to edit a commit** - Use `git commit --amend`
- ❌ **Haven't pushed yet** - Reset is cleaner for local cleanup
- ❌ **Need to combine commits** - Use interactive rebase
- ❌ **Reverting creates complex conflicts** - Might need manual fix forward
## Revert vs. Reset vs. Rebase
| Command | History | Safety | Use Case |
|---------|---------|--------|----------|
| **revert** | Preserves | ✅ Safe | Undo pushed commits |
| **reset** | Erases | ⚠️ Dangerous | Clean up local commits |
| **rebase** | Rewrites | ⚠️ Dangerous | Polish commit history |
**This module teaches revert.** You'll learn reset in Module 06.
## Handling Revert Conflicts
Sometimes reverting causes conflicts if subsequent changes touched the same code:
```bash
# Start revert
git revert <commit-hash>
# If conflicts occur:
# Conflict in calculator.py
# CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in calculator.py
```
**To resolve:**
1. Open conflicted files and fix conflicts (look for `<<<<<<<` markers)
2. Stage resolved files:
```bash
git add <resolved-files>
```
3. Continue the revert:
```bash
git revert --continue
```
Or abort if you change your mind:
```bash
git revert --abort
```
## Common Mistakes
### 1. Forgetting -m for Merge Commits
```bash
# ❌ Wrong - will fail
git revert <merge-commit>
# ✅ Correct
git revert -m 1 <merge-commit>
```
### 2. Trying to Re-Merge After Revert
```bash
# After reverting a merge:
git revert -m 1 <merge-commit>
# ❌ This won't work as expected
git merge feature-branch # Empty merge!
# ✅ Do this instead
git revert <the-revert-commit> # Revert the revert
```
### 3. Using Reset on Pushed Commits
```bash
# ❌ NEVER do this with pushed commits
git reset --hard HEAD~3
# ✅ Do this instead
git revert HEAD~3..HEAD
```
### 4. Reverting Commits in Wrong Order
When reverting multiple related commits, revert from newest to oldest:
```bash
# If you have: A → B → C (and C depends on B)
# ✅ Correct order
git revert C
git revert B
# ❌ Wrong order (may cause conflicts)
git revert B # Conflict! C still references B
git revert C
```
## Best Practices
1. **Write clear revert messages:**
```bash
git revert <hash> -m "Revert authentication - security issue #1234"
```
2. **Link to issue tracking:**
```
Revert "Add new payment system"
This reverts commit abc123.
Critical bug in payment processing.
See bug tracker: ISSUE-1234
```
3. **Test after reverting:**
- Run your test suite
- Verify the application still works
- Check no unintended changes occurred
4. **Communicate with team:**
- Announce reverts in team chat
- Explain why the revert was necessary
- Provide timeline for re-introducing the feature
5. **Keep reverts focused:**
- Revert the minimum necessary
- Don't bundle multiple unrelated reverts
- One problem = one revert commit
## Troubleshooting
### "Commit is a merge but no -m option was given"
**Problem:** Trying to revert a merge commit without `-m`.
**Solution:**
```bash
git revert -m 1 <merge-commit-hash>
```
### "Empty Revert / No Changes"
**Problem:** Revert doesn't seem to do anything.
**Possible causes:**
- Commit was already reverted
- Subsequent commits already undid the changes
- Wrong commit hash
**Solution:**
```bash
# Check what the commit actually changed
git show <commit-hash>
# Check if already reverted
git log --grep="Revert"
```
### "Conflicts During Revert"
**Problem:** Revert causes merge conflicts.
**Why:** Subsequent commits modified the same code.
**Solution:**
1. Manually resolve conflicts in affected files
2. `git add <resolved-files>`
3. `git revert --continue`
Or consider fixing forward with a new commit instead of reverting.
### "Can't Re-Merge After Reverting Merge"
**Problem:** After reverting a merge, re-merging the branch brings no changes.
**Solution:** Revert the revert commit:
```bash
# Find the revert commit
git log --oneline
# Revert the revert (brings changes back)
git revert <revert-commit-hash>
```
## Advanced: Revert Internals
Understanding what revert does under the hood:
```bash
# Revert creates a new commit with inverse changes
git revert <commit-hash>
# This is equivalent to:
git diff <commit-hash>^..<commit-hash> > changes.patch
patch -R < changes.patch # Apply in reverse
git add .
git commit -m "Revert '<original message>'"
```
**Key insight:** Revert computes the diff of the target commit, inverts it, and applies it as a new commit.
## Going Further
Now that you understand revert, you're ready for:
- **Module 06: Git Reset** - Learn the dangerous but powerful local history rewriting
- **Module 07: Git Stash** - Temporarily set aside uncommitted changes
- **Module 08: Multiplayer Git** - Collaborate with advanced workflows
## Summary
You've learned:
- ✅ `git revert` creates new commits that undo previous changes
- ✅ Revert is safe for shared/pushed commits
- ✅ Merge commits require `-m 1` or `-m 2` flag
- ✅ Parent 1 = branch merged into, Parent 2 = branch merged from
- ✅ Can't simply re-merge after reverting a merge
- ✅ Multiple commits can be reverted in one command
- ✅ Revert preserves complete history for audit trails
**The Golden Rule of Revert:** Use revert for any commit that might be shared with others.
## Next Steps
1. Complete all three challenge scenarios
2. Run `./verify.ps1` to check your solutions
3. Experiment with reverting different commits
4. Move on to Module 06: Git Reset (dangerous but powerful!)
---
**Need Help?**
- Review the command reference above
- Check the troubleshooting section
- Re-run `./setup.ps1` to start fresh
- Practice reverting in different orders to understand the behavior

View File

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the Module 05 challenge environment to start fresh.
.DESCRIPTION
This script removes the challenge directory and re-runs setup.ps1
to create a fresh challenge environment.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Resetting Module 05: Git Revert Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
Write-Host "[OK] Challenge directory removed" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[INFO] No existing challenge directory found" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# Run setup to create fresh environment
Write-Host "`nRunning setup to create fresh challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
& "$PSScriptRoot/setup.ps1"

View File

@@ -1,373 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the Module 05 challenge environment for learning git revert.
.DESCRIPTION
This script creates a challenge directory with three branches demonstrating
different revert scenarios:
- regular-revert: Basic revert of a single bad commit
- merge-revert: Reverting a merge commit with -m flag
- multi-revert: Reverting multiple commits at once
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Setting up Module 05: Git Revert Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Remove existing challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
}
# Create fresh challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Green
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize Git repository
Write-Host "Initializing Git repository..." -ForegroundColor Green
git init | Out-Null
# Configure git for this repository
git config user.name "Workshop Student"
git config user.email "student@example.com"
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 1: Regular Revert (Basic)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 1: Creating regular-revert branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Initial commit
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial calculator implementation" | Out-Null
# Create regular-revert branch
git switch -c regular-revert | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add multiply
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def multiply(a, b):
"""Multiply two numbers."""
return a * b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add multiply function" | Out-Null
# BAD commit: Add broken divide function
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def multiply(a, b):
"""Multiply two numbers."""
return a * b
def divide(a, b):
"""Divide a by b - BROKEN: doesn't handle division by zero!"""
return a / b # This will crash if b is 0!
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add broken divide function - needs to be reverted!" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add modulo (after bad commit)
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def multiply(a, b):
"""Multiply two numbers."""
return a * b
def divide(a, b):
"""Divide a by b - BROKEN: doesn't handle division by zero!"""
return a / b # This will crash if b is 0!
def modulo(a, b):
"""Return remainder of a divided by b."""
return a % b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add modulo function" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] regular-revert branch with bad divide commit" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 2: Merge Revert (Merge Commit with -m flag)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 2: Creating merge-revert scenario..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Switch back to main
git switch main | Out-Null
# Create merge-revert branch
git switch -c merge-revert | Out-Null
# Create a feature branch to merge
git switch -c feature-auth | Out-Null
# Add auth functionality
$authContent = @"
# auth.py - Authentication module
def login(username, password):
\"\"\"Login user.\"\"\"
print(f"Logging in {username}...")
return True
def logout(username):
\"\"\"Logout user.\"\"\"
print(f"Logging out {username}...")
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "auth.py" -Value $authContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add authentication module" | Out-Null
# Add password validation
$authContent = @"
# auth.py - Authentication module
def validate_password(password):
\"\"\"Validate password strength.\"\"\"
return len(password) >= 8
def login(username, password):
\"\"\"Login user.\"\"\"
if not validate_password(password):
print("Password too weak!")
return False
print(f"Logging in {username}...")
return True
def logout(username):
\"\"\"Logout user.\"\"\"
print(f"Logging out {username}...")
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "auth.py" -Value $authContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add password validation" | Out-Null
# Integrate auth into calculator (part of the feature branch)
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
from auth import login
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def secure_divide(a, b, username):
"""Secure divide - requires authentication."""
if login(username, "password123"):
return a / b
return None
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Integrate auth into calculator" | Out-Null
# Switch back to merge-revert and merge feature-auth
git switch merge-revert | Out-Null
git merge feature-auth --no-ff -m "Merge feature-auth branch" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] merge-revert branch with merge commit to revert" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 3: Multi Revert (Multiple Bad Commits)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 3: Creating multi-revert branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Switch back to main
git switch main | Out-Null
# Create multi-revert branch
git switch -c multi-revert | Out-Null
# Reset calculator to simple version
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Reset to basic calculator" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add power function
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def power(a, b):
"""Raise a to the power of b."""
return a ** b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add power function" | Out-Null
# BAD commit 1: Add broken square_root
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def power(a, b):
"""Raise a to the power of b."""
return a ** b
def square_root(a):
"""BROKEN: Returns wrong result for negative numbers!"""
return a ** 0.5 # This returns NaN for negative numbers!
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add broken square_root - REVERT THIS!" | Out-Null
# BAD commit 2: Add broken logarithm
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def power(a, b):
"""Raise a to the power of b."""
return a ** b
def square_root(a):
"""BROKEN: Returns wrong result for negative numbers!"""
return a ** 0.5 # This returns NaN for negative numbers!
def logarithm(a):
"""BROKEN: Doesn't handle zero or negative numbers!"""
import math
return math.log(a) # This crashes for a <= 0!
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add broken logarithm - REVERT THIS TOO!" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add absolute value (after bad commits)
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
def power(a, b):
"""Raise a to the power of b."""
return a ** b
def square_root(a):
"""BROKEN: Returns wrong result for negative numbers!"""
return a ** 0.5 # This returns NaN for negative numbers!
def logarithm(a):
"""BROKEN: Doesn't handle zero or negative numbers!"""
import math
return math.log(a) # This crashes for a <= 0!
def absolute(a):
"""Return absolute value of a."""
return abs(a)
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add absolute value function" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] multi-revert branch with two bad commits to revert" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# Return to regular-revert to start
# ============================================================================
git switch regular-revert | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n=== Setup Complete! ===" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nThree revert scenarios have been created:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. regular-revert - Revert a single bad commit (basic)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. merge-revert - Revert a merge commit with -m flag" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. multi-revert - Revert multiple bad commits" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nYou are currently on the 'regular-revert' branch." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nNext steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Read the README.md for detailed instructions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Complete each revert challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Run '..\verify.ps1' to check your solutions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""

View File

@@ -1,717 +0,0 @@
# Module 06: Git Reset - Dangerous History Rewriting
## ⚠️ CRITICAL SAFETY WARNING ⚠️
**Git reset is DESTRUCTIVE and DANGEROUS when misused!**
Before using `git reset`, always ask yourself:
```
Have I pushed these commits to a remote repository?
├─ YES → ❌ DO NOT USE RESET!
│ Use git revert instead (Module 05)
│ Rewriting pushed history breaks collaboration!
└─ NO → ✅ Proceed with reset (local cleanup only)
Choose your mode carefully:
--soft (safest), --mixed (moderate), --hard (DANGEROUS)
```
**The Golden Rule:** NEVER reset commits that have been pushed/shared.
## About This Module
Welcome to Module 06, where you'll learn the powerful but dangerous `git reset` command. Unlike `git revert` (Module 05) which safely creates new commits, **reset erases commits from history**.
**Why reset exists:**
- ✅ Clean up messy local commit history before pushing
- ✅ Undo commits you haven't shared yet
- ✅ Unstage files from the staging area
- ✅ Recover from mistakes (with reflog)
**Why reset is dangerous:**
- ⚠️ Erases commits permanently (without reflog)
- ⚠️ Breaks repositories if used on pushed commits
- ⚠️ Can lose work if used incorrectly
- ⚠️ Confuses teammates if they have your commits
**Key principle:** Reset is for polishing LOCAL history before sharing.
## Learning Objectives
By completing this module, you will:
1. Understand the three reset modes: --soft, --mixed, --hard
2. Reset commits while keeping changes staged (--soft)
3. Reset commits and unstage changes (--mixed)
4. Reset commits and discard everything (--hard)
5. Know when reset is appropriate (local only!)
6. Understand when to use revert instead
7. Use reflog to recover from mistakes
## Prerequisites
Before starting this module, you should:
- Be comfortable with commits and staging (`git add`, `git commit`)
- Understand `git revert` from Module 05
- **Know the difference between local and pushed commits!**
## Setup
Run the setup script to create the challenge environment:
```powershell
./setup.ps1
```
This creates a `challenge/` directory with three branches demonstrating different reset modes:
- `soft-reset` - Reset with --soft (keep changes staged)
- `mixed-reset` - Reset with --mixed (unstage changes)
- `hard-reset` - Reset with --hard (discard everything)
**Remember:** These are all LOCAL commits that have NEVER been pushed!
## Understanding Reset Modes
Git reset has three modes that control what happens to your changes:
| Mode | Commits | Staging Area | Working Directory |
|------|---------|--------------|-------------------|
| **--soft** | ✂️ Removed | ✅ Kept (staged) | ✅ Kept |
| **--mixed** (default) | ✂️ Removed | ✂️ Cleared | ✅ Kept (unstaged) |
| **--hard** | ✂️ Removed | ✂️ Cleared | ✂️ **LOST!** |
**Visual explanation:**
```
Before reset (3 commits):
A → B → C → HEAD
After git reset --soft HEAD~1:
A → B → HEAD
C's changes are staged
After git reset --mixed HEAD~1 (or just git reset HEAD~1):
A → B → HEAD
C's changes are unstaged (in working directory)
After git reset --hard HEAD~1:
A → B → HEAD
C's changes are GONE (discarded completely!)
```
## Challenge 1: Soft Reset (Safest)
### Scenario
You committed "feature C" but immediately realized the implementation is wrong. You want to undo the commit but keep the changes staged so you can edit and re-commit them properly.
**Use case:** Fixing the last commit's message or contents.
### Your Task
1. Navigate to the challenge directory:
```bash
cd challenge
```
2. You should be on the `soft-reset` branch. View the commits:
```bash
git log --oneline
```
You should see:
- "Add feature C - needs better implementation!"
- "Add feature B"
- "Add feature A"
- "Initial project setup"
3. View the current state:
```bash
git status
# Should be clean
```
4. Reset the last commit with --soft:
```bash
git reset --soft HEAD~1
```
5. Check what happened:
```bash
# Commit is gone
git log --oneline
# Should only show 3 commits now (feature C commit removed)
# Changes are still staged
git status
# Should show "Changes to be committed"
# View the staged changes
git diff --cached
# Should show feature C code ready to be re-committed
```
### What to Observe
After `--soft` reset:
- ✅ Commit removed from history
- ✅ Changes remain in staging area
- ✅ Working directory unchanged
- ✅ Ready to edit and re-commit
**When to use --soft:**
- Fix the last commit message (though `commit --amend` is simpler)
- Combine multiple commits into one
- Re-do a commit with better changes
## Challenge 2: Mixed Reset (Default, Moderate)
### Scenario
You committed two experimental features that aren't ready. You want to remove both commits and have the changes back in your working directory (unstaged) so you can review and selectively re-commit them.
**Use case:** Undoing commits and starting over with more careful staging.
### Your Task
1. Switch to the mixed-reset branch:
```bash
git switch mixed-reset
```
2. View the commits:
```bash
git log --oneline
```
You should see:
- "Add debug mode - REMOVE THIS TOO!"
- "Add experimental feature X - REMOVE THIS!"
- "Add logging system"
- "Add application lifecycle"
3. Reset the last TWO commits (default is --mixed):
```bash
git reset HEAD~2
# This is equivalent to: git reset --mixed HEAD~2
```
4. Check what happened:
```bash
# Commits are gone
git log --oneline
# Should only show 2 commits (lifecycle + logging)
# NO staged changes
git diff --cached
# Should be empty
# Changes are in working directory (unstaged)
git status
# Should show "Changes not staged for commit"
# View the unstaged changes
git diff
# Should show experimental and debug code
```
### What to Observe
After `--mixed` reset (the default):
- ✅ Commits removed from history
- ✅ Staging area cleared
- ✅ Changes moved to working directory (unstaged)
- ✅ Can selectively stage and re-commit parts
**When to use --mixed (default):**
- Undo commits and start over with clean staging
- Split one large commit into multiple smaller ones
- Review changes before re-committing
- Most common reset mode for cleanup
## Challenge 3: Hard Reset (MOST DANGEROUS!)
### ⚠️ EXTREME CAUTION REQUIRED ⚠️
**This will PERMANENTLY DELETE your work!**
Only use `--hard` when you're absolutely sure you want to throw away changes.
### Scenario
You committed completely broken code that you want to discard entirely. There's no salvaging it—you just want it gone.
**Use case:** Throwing away failed experiments or completely wrong code.
### Your Task
1. Switch to the hard-reset branch:
```bash
git switch hard-reset
```
2. View the commits and the broken code:
```bash
git log --oneline
# Shows "Add broken helper D - DISCARD COMPLETELY!"
cat utils.py
# Shows the broken helper_d function
```
3. Reset the last commit with --hard:
```bash
git reset --hard HEAD~1
```
**WARNING:** This will permanently discard all changes from that commit!
4. Check what happened:
```bash
# Commit is gone
git log --oneline
# Should only show 2 commits
# NO staged changes
git diff --cached
# Empty
# NO unstaged changes
git diff
# Empty
# Working directory clean
git status
# "nothing to commit, working tree clean"
# File doesn't have broken code
cat utils.py
# helper_d is completely gone
```
### What to Observe
After `--hard` reset:
- ✅ Commit removed from history
- ✅ Staging area cleared
- ✅ Working directory reset to match
- ⚠️ All changes from that commit PERMANENTLY DELETED
**When to use --hard:**
- Discarding failed experiments completely
- Throwing away work you don't want (CAREFUL!)
- Cleaning up after mistakes (use reflog to recover if needed)
- Resetting to a known good state
**⚠️ WARNING:** Files in the discarded commit are NOT gone forever—they're still in reflog for about 90 days. See "Recovery with Reflog" section below.
## Understanding HEAD~N Syntax
When resetting, you specify where to reset to:
```bash
# Reset to the commit before HEAD
git reset HEAD~1
# Reset to 2 commits before HEAD
git reset HEAD~2
# Reset to 3 commits before HEAD
git reset HEAD~3
# Reset to a specific commit hash
git reset abc123
# Reset to a branch
git reset main
```
**Visualization:**
```
HEAD~3 HEAD~2 HEAD~1 HEAD
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
A → B → C → D → E
Current commit
```
- `git reset HEAD~1` moves HEAD from E to D
- `git reset HEAD~2` moves HEAD from E to C
- `git reset abc123` moves HEAD to that specific commit
## Verification
Verify your solutions by running the verification script:
```bash
cd .. # Return to module directory
./verify.ps1
```
The script checks that:
- ✅ Commits were reset (count decreased)
- ✅ --soft: Changes remain staged
- ✅ --mixed: Changes are unstaged
- ✅ --hard: Everything is clean
## Recovery with Reflog
**Good news:** Even `--hard` reset doesn't immediately destroy commits!
Git keeps a "reflog" (reference log) of where HEAD has been for about 90 days. You can use this to recover "lost" commits.
### How to Recover from a Reset
1. View the reflog:
```bash
git reflog
```
Output example:
```
abc123 HEAD@{0}: reset: moving to HEAD~1
def456 HEAD@{1}: commit: Add broken helper D
...
```
2. Find the commit you want to recover (def456 in this example)
3. Reset back to it:
```bash
git reset def456
# Or use the reflog reference:
git reset HEAD@{1}
```
4. Your "lost" commit is back!
### Reflog Safety Net
**Important:**
- Reflog entries expire after ~90 days (configurable)
- Reflog is LOCAL to your repository (not shared)
- `git gc` can clean up old reflog entries
- If you really lose a commit, check reflog first!
**Pro tip:** Before doing dangerous operations, note your current commit hash:
```bash
git log --oneline | head -1
# abc123 Current work
```
## When to Use Git Reset
Use `git reset` when:
- ✅ **Commits are LOCAL only** (never pushed)
- ✅ **Cleaning up messy history** before sharing
- ✅ **Undoing recent commits** you don't want
- ✅ **Combining commits** into one clean commit
- ✅ **Unstaging files** (mixed mode)
- ✅ **Polishing commit history** before pull request
**Golden Rule:** Only reset commits that are local to your machine!
## When NOT to Use Git Reset
DO NOT use `git reset` when:
- ❌ **Commits are pushed/shared** with others
- ❌ **Teammates have your commits** (breaks their repos)
- ❌ **In public repositories** (use revert instead)
- ❌ **Unsure if pushed** (check `git log origin/main`)
- ❌ **On main/master branch** after push
- ❌ **Need audit trail** of changes
**Use git revert instead** (Module 05) for pushed commits!
## Decision Tree: Reset vs Revert
```
Need to undo a commit?
├─ Have you pushed this commit?
│ │
│ ├─ YES → Use git revert (Module 05)
│ │ Safe for shared history
│ │ Preserves complete audit trail
│ │
│ └─ NO → Can use git reset (local only)
│ │
│ ├─ Want to keep changes?
│ │ │
│ │ ├─ Keep staged → git reset --soft
│ │ └─ Keep unstaged → git reset --mixed
│ │
│ └─ Discard everything? → git reset --hard
│ (CAREFUL!)
```
## Reset vs Revert vs Rebase
| Command | History | Safety | Use Case |
|---------|---------|--------|----------|
| **reset** | Erases | ⚠️ Dangerous | Local cleanup before push |
| **revert** | Preserves | ✅ Safe | Undo pushed commits |
| **rebase** | Rewrites | ⚠️ Dangerous | Polish history before push |
**This module teaches reset.** You learned revert in Module 05.
## Command Reference
### Basic Reset
```bash
# Reset last commit, keep changes staged
git reset --soft HEAD~1
# Reset last commit, unstage changes (default)
git reset HEAD~1
git reset --mixed HEAD~1 # Same as above
# Reset last commit, discard everything (DANGEROUS!)
git reset --hard HEAD~1
# Reset multiple commits
git reset --soft HEAD~3 # Last 3 commits
# Reset to specific commit
git reset --soft abc123
```
### Unstaging Files
```bash
# Unstage a specific file (common use of reset)
git reset HEAD filename.txt
# Unstage all files
git reset HEAD .
# This is the same as:
git restore --staged filename.txt # Modern syntax
```
### Reflog and Recovery
```bash
# View reflog
git reflog
# Recover from reset
git reset --hard HEAD@{1}
git reset --hard abc123
```
### Check Before Reset
```bash
# Check if commits are pushed
git log origin/main..HEAD
# If output is empty, commits are pushed (DO NOT RESET)
# If output shows commits, they're local (safe to reset)
# Another way to check
git log --oneline --graph --all
# Look for origin/main marker
```
## Common Mistakes
### 1. Resetting Pushed Commits
```bash
# ❌ NEVER do this if you've pushed!
git push
# ... time passes ...
git reset --hard HEAD~3 # BREAKS teammate repos!
# ✅ Do this instead
git revert HEAD~3..HEAD # Safe for shared history
```
### 2. Using --hard Without Thinking
```bash
# ❌ Dangerous - loses work!
git reset --hard HEAD~1
# ✅ Better - keep changes to review
git reset --mixed HEAD~1
# Now you can review changes and decide
```
### 3. Resetting Without Checking If Pushed
```bash
# ❌ Risky - are these commits pushed?
git reset HEAD~5
# ✅ Check first
git log origin/main..HEAD # Local commits only
git reset HEAD~5 # Now safe if output showed commits
```
### 4. Forgetting Reflog Exists
```bash
# ❌ Panic after accidental --hard reset
# "I lost my work!"
# ✅ Check reflog first!
git reflog # Find the "lost" commit
git reset --hard HEAD@{1} # Recover it
```
## Best Practices
1. **Always check if commits are pushed before reset:**
```bash
git log origin/main..HEAD
```
2. **Prefer --mixed over --hard:**
- You can always discard changes later
- Hard to recover if you use --hard by mistake
3. **Commit often locally, reset before push:**
- Make many small local commits
- Reset/squash into clean commits before pushing
4. **Use descriptive commit messages even for local commits:**
- Helps when reviewing before reset
- Useful when checking reflog
5. **Know your escape hatch:**
```bash
git reflog # Your safety net!
```
6. **Communicate with team:**
- NEVER reset shared branches (main, develop, etc.)
- Only reset your personal feature branches
- Only before pushing!
## Troubleshooting
### "I accidentally reset with --hard and lost work!"
**Solution:** Check reflog:
```bash
git reflog
# Find the commit before your reset
git reset --hard HEAD@{1} # Or the commit hash
```
**Prevention:** Always use --mixed first, then discard if really needed.
### "I reset but teammates still have my commits"
**Problem:** You reset and pushed with --force after they pulled.
**Impact:** Their repository is now broken/inconsistent.
**Solution:** Communicate! They need to:
```bash
git fetch
git reset --hard origin/main # Or whatever branch
```
**Prevention:** NEVER reset pushed commits!
### "Reset didn't do what I expected"
**Issue:** Wrong mode or wrong HEAD~N count.
**Solution:** Check current state:
```bash
git status
git diff
git diff --cached
git log --oneline
```
Undo the reset:
```bash
git reflog
git reset HEAD@{1} # Go back to before your reset
```
### "Can't reset - 'fatal: ambiguous argument HEAD~1'"
**Issue:** No commits to reset (probably first commit).
**Solution:** You can't reset before the first commit. If you want to remove the first commit entirely:
```bash
rm -rf .git # Nuclear option - deletes entire repo
git init # Start over
```
## Advanced: Reset Internals
Understanding what reset does under the hood:
```bash
# Reset moves the branch pointer
# Before:
main → A → B → C (HEAD)
# After git reset --soft HEAD~1:
main → A → B (HEAD)
C still exists in reflog, just not in branch history
# The commit object C is still in .git/objects
# It's just unreachable from any branch
```
**Key insight:** Reset moves the HEAD and branch pointers backward. The commits still exist temporarily in reflog until garbage collection.
## Going Further
Now that you understand reset, you're ready for:
- **Module 07: Git Stash** - Temporarily save uncommitted work
- **Module 08: Multiplayer Git** - Collaborate with complex workflows
- **Interactive Rebase** - Advanced history polishing (beyond this workshop)
## Summary
You've learned:
- ✅ `git reset` rewrites history by moving HEAD backward
- ✅ `--soft` keeps changes staged (safest)
- ✅ `--mixed` (default) unstages changes
- ✅ `--hard` discards everything (most dangerous)
- ✅ NEVER reset pushed/shared commits
- ✅ Use reflog to recover from mistakes
- ✅ Check if commits are pushed before resetting
- ✅ Use revert (Module 05) for shared commits
**The Critical Rule:** Reset is for LOCAL commits ONLY. Once you push, use revert!
## Next Steps
1. Complete all three challenge scenarios
2. Run `./verify.ps1` to check your solutions
3. Practice checking if commits are pushed before reset
4. Move on to Module 07: Git Stash
---
**⚠️ FINAL REMINDER ⚠️**
**Before any `git reset` command, ask yourself:**
> "Have I pushed these commits?"
If YES → Use `git revert` instead!
If NO → Proceed carefully, choose the right mode.
**When in doubt, use --mixed instead of --hard!**

View File

@@ -1,348 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the Module 06 challenge environment for learning git reset.
.DESCRIPTION
This script creates a challenge directory with three branches demonstrating
different reset scenarios:
- soft-reset: Reset with --soft (keeps changes staged)
- mixed-reset: Reset with --mixed (unstages changes)
- hard-reset: Reset with --hard (discards everything) + reflog recovery
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Setting up Module 06: Git Reset Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "⚠️ WARNING: Git reset is DANGEROUS - use with extreme caution! ⚠️" -ForegroundColor Red
# Remove existing challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
}
# Create fresh challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Green
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize Git repository
Write-Host "Initializing Git repository..." -ForegroundColor Green
git init | Out-Null
# Configure git for this repository
git config user.name "Workshop Student"
git config user.email "student@example.com"
# ============================================================================
# Create initial commit (shared by all scenarios)
# ============================================================================
$readmeContent = @"
# Git Reset Practice
This repository contains practice scenarios for learning git reset.
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readmeContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit" | Out-Null
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 1: Soft Reset (--soft)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 1: Creating soft-reset branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Create soft-reset branch from initial commit
git switch -c soft-reset | Out-Null
# Build up scenario 1 commits
$projectContent = @"
# project.py - Main project file
def initialize():
"""Initialize the project."""
print("Project initialized")
def main():
initialize()
print("Running application...")
"@
Set-Content -Path "project.py" -Value $projectContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial project setup" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add feature A
$projectContent = @"
# project.py - Main project file
def initialize():
"""Initialize the project."""
print("Project initialized")
def feature_a():
"""Feature A implementation."""
print("Feature A is working")
def main():
initialize()
feature_a()
print("Running application...")
"@
Set-Content -Path "project.py" -Value $projectContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add feature A" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add feature B
$projectContent = @"
# project.py - Main project file
def initialize():
"""Initialize the project."""
print("Project initialized")
def feature_a():
"""Feature A implementation."""
print("Feature A is working")
def feature_b():
"""Feature B implementation."""
print("Feature B is working")
def main():
initialize()
feature_a()
feature_b()
print("Running application...")
"@
Set-Content -Path "project.py" -Value $projectContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add feature B" | Out-Null
# BAD commit: Add feature C (wrong implementation)
$projectContent = @"
# project.py - Main project file
def initialize():
"""Initialize the project."""
print("Project initialized")
def feature_a():
"""Feature A implementation."""
print("Feature A is working")
def feature_b():
"""Feature B implementation."""
print("Feature B is working")
def feature_c():
"""Feature C implementation - WRONG!"""
print("Feature C has bugs!") # This needs to be re-implemented
def main():
initialize()
feature_a()
feature_b()
feature_c()
print("Running application...")
"@
Set-Content -Path "project.py" -Value $projectContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add feature C - needs better implementation!" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] soft-reset branch with commit to reset --soft" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 2: Mixed Reset (--mixed, default)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 2: Creating mixed-reset branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Switch back to initial commit and create mixed-reset branch
git switch main | Out-Null
git switch -c mixed-reset | Out-Null
# Build up scenario 2 commits
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Application entry point
def start():
"""Start the application."""
print("Application started")
def stop():
"""Stop the application."""
print("Application stopped")
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add application lifecycle" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add logging
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Application entry point
def log(message):
"""Log a message."""
print(f"[LOG] {message}")
def start():
"""Start the application."""
log("Application started")
def stop():
"""Stop the application."""
log("Application stopped")
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add logging system" | Out-Null
# BAD commit 1: Add experimental feature X
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Application entry point
def log(message):
"""Log a message."""
print(f"[LOG] {message}")
def experimental_feature_x():
"""Experimental feature - NOT READY!"""
log("Feature X is experimental and buggy")
def start():
"""Start the application."""
log("Application started")
experimental_feature_x()
def stop():
"""Stop the application."""
log("Application stopped")
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add experimental feature X - REMOVE THIS!" | Out-Null
# BAD commit 2: Add debug mode (also not ready)
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Application entry point
DEBUG_MODE = True # Should not be committed!
def log(message):
"""Log a message."""
print(f"[LOG] {message}")
def experimental_feature_x():
"""Experimental feature - NOT READY!"""
log("Feature X is experimental and buggy")
def start():
"""Start the application."""
if DEBUG_MODE:
log("DEBUG MODE ACTIVE!")
log("Application started")
experimental_feature_x()
def stop():
"""Stop the application."""
log("Application stopped")
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add debug mode - REMOVE THIS TOO!" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] mixed-reset branch with commits to reset --mixed" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 3: Hard Reset (--hard) + Reflog Recovery
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 3: Creating hard-reset branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Switch back to main and create hard-reset branch
git switch main | Out-Null
git switch -c hard-reset | Out-Null
# Reset to basic state
$utilsContent = @"
# utils.py - Utility functions
def helper_a():
"""Helper function A."""
return "Helper A"
def helper_b():
"""Helper function B."""
return "Helper B"
"@
Set-Content -Path "utils.py" -Value $utilsContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add utility helpers" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add helper C
$utilsContent = @"
# utils.py - Utility functions
def helper_a():
"""Helper function A."""
return "Helper A"
def helper_b():
"""Helper function B."""
return "Helper B"
def helper_c():
"""Helper function C."""
return "Helper C"
"@
Set-Content -Path "utils.py" -Value $utilsContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add helper C" | Out-Null
# BAD commit: Add broken helper D (completely wrong)
$utilsContent = @"
# utils.py - Utility functions
def helper_a():
"""Helper function A."""
return "Helper A"
def helper_b():
"""Helper function B."""
return "Helper B"
def helper_c():
"""Helper function C."""
return "Helper C"
def helper_d():
"""COMPLETELY BROKEN - throw away!"""
# This is all wrong and needs to be discarded
broken_code = "This doesn't even make sense"
return broken_code.nonexistent_method() # Will crash!
"@
Set-Content -Path "utils.py" -Value $utilsContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add broken helper D - DISCARD COMPLETELY!" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] hard-reset branch with commit to reset --hard" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# Return to soft-reset to start
# ============================================================================
git switch soft-reset | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n=== Setup Complete! ===`n" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "Three reset scenarios have been created:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. soft-reset - Reset --soft (keep changes staged)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. mixed-reset - Reset --mixed (unstage changes)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. hard-reset - Reset --hard (discard everything) + reflog recovery" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`n⚠️ CRITICAL SAFETY REMINDER ⚠️" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "NEVER use git reset on commits that have been PUSHED!" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "These scenarios are LOCAL ONLY for practice." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nYou are currently on the 'soft-reset' branch." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nNext steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Read the README.md for detailed instructions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Complete each reset challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Run '..\\verify.ps1' to check your solutions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""

View File

@@ -1,231 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the Module 06 challenge solutions.
.DESCRIPTION
Checks that all three reset scenarios have been completed correctly:
- soft-reset: Commit reset but changes remain staged
- mixed-reset: Commits reset and changes unstaged
- hard-reset: Everything reset and discarded
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying Module 06: Git Reset Solutions ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "⚠️ Remember: NEVER reset pushed commits! ⚠️" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $true
$originalDir = Get-Location
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "challenge")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Challenge directory not found. Run setup.ps1 first." -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
Set-Location "challenge"
# Check if git repository exists
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Not a git repository. Run setup.ps1 first." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location $originalDir
exit 1
}
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 1: Soft Reset Verification
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`n=== Scenario 1: Soft Reset ===`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch soft-reset 2>&1 | Out-Null
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] soft-reset branch not found" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
} else {
# Count commits (should be 4: Initial + project setup + feature A + feature B)
$commitCount = [int](git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null)
if ($commitCount -eq 4) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Commit count is 4 (feature C commit was reset)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Expected 4 commits, found $commitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Use: git reset --soft HEAD~1" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check if changes are staged
$stagedChanges = git diff --cached --name-only 2>$null
if ($stagedChanges) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Changes are staged (feature C code in staging area)" -ForegroundColor Green
# Verify the staged changes contain feature C code
$stagedContent = git diff --cached 2>$null
if ($stagedContent -match "feature_c") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Staged changes contain feature C code" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[INFO] Staged changes don't seem to contain feature C" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No staged changes found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] After --soft reset, changes should remain staged" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check working directory has no unstaged changes to tracked files
$unstagedChanges = git diff --name-only 2>$null
if (-not $unstagedChanges) {
Write-Host "[PASS] No unstaged changes (all changes are staged)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[INFO] Found unstaged changes (expected only staged changes)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
}
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 2: Mixed Reset Verification
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`n=== Scenario 2: Mixed Reset ===`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch mixed-reset 2>&1 | Out-Null
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] mixed-reset branch not found" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
} else {
# Count commits (should be 3: Initial + lifecycle + logging, bad commits removed)
$commitCount = [int](git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null)
if ($commitCount -eq 3) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Commit count is 3 (both bad commits were reset)" -ForegroundColor Green
} elseif ($commitCount -eq 4) {
Write-Host "[INFO] Commit count is 4 (one commit reset, need to reset one more)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "[HINT] Use: git reset HEAD~1 (or git reset --mixed HEAD~1)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Expected 3 commits, found $commitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Use: git reset --mixed HEAD~2 to remove both bad commits" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that there are NO staged changes
$stagedChanges = git diff --cached --name-only 2>$null
if (-not $stagedChanges) {
Write-Host "[PASS] No staged changes (--mixed unstages everything)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Found staged changes (--mixed should unstage)" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] After --mixed reset, changes should be unstaged" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that there ARE unstaged changes in working directory
$unstagedChanges = git diff --name-only 2>$null
if ($unstagedChanges) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Unstaged changes present in working directory" -ForegroundColor Green
# Verify unstaged changes contain the experimental/debug code
$workingContent = git diff 2>$null
if ($workingContent -match "experimental|DEBUG") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Unstaged changes contain the reset code" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[INFO] Unstaged changes don't contain expected code" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No unstaged changes found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] After --mixed reset, changes should be in working directory (unstaged)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
}
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 3: Hard Reset Verification
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`n=== Scenario 3: Hard Reset ===`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch hard-reset 2>&1 | Out-Null
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] hard-reset branch not found" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
} else {
# Count commits (should be 3: Initial + utilities + helper C, bad commit removed)
$commitCount = [int](git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null)
if ($commitCount -eq 3) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Commit count is 3 (broken commit was reset)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Expected 3 commits, found $commitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Use: git reset --hard HEAD~1" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that there are NO staged changes
$stagedChanges = git diff --cached --name-only 2>$null
if (-not $stagedChanges) {
Write-Host "[PASS] No staged changes (--hard discards everything)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Found staged changes (--hard should discard all)" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that there are NO unstaged changes
$unstagedChanges = git diff --name-only 2>$null
if (-not $unstagedChanges) {
Write-Host "[PASS] No unstaged changes (--hard discards everything)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Found unstaged changes (--hard should discard all)" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check working directory is clean
$statusOutput = git status --porcelain 2>$null
if (-not $statusOutput) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Working directory is completely clean" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[INFO] Working directory has some changes" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# Verify the file doesn't have the broken code
if (Test-Path "utils.py") {
$utilsContent = Get-Content "utils.py" -Raw
if ($utilsContent -notmatch "helper_d") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Broken helper_d function is gone" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Broken helper_d still exists (wasn't reset)" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
if ($utilsContent -match "helper_c") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Good helper_c function is preserved" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Good helper_c function missing" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
}
}
Set-Location $originalDir
# Final summary
Write-Host ""
if ($allChecksPassed) {
Write-Host "==========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host " CONGRATULATIONS! ALL SCENARIOS PASSED!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "==========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou've mastered git reset!" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "You now understand:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " ✓ Resetting commits with --soft (keep staged)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Resetting commits with --mixed (unstage)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Resetting commits with --hard (discard all)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ The DANGER of reset on shared history" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`n⚠️ CRITICAL REMINDER ⚠️" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "NEVER use 'git reset' on commits you've already PUSHED!" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Always use 'git revert' (Module 05) for shared commits!" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nReady for Module 07: Git Stash!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host ""
exit 0
} else {
Write-Host "[SUMMARY] Some checks failed. Review the hints above and try again." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[INFO] You can run this verification script as many times as needed." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "[REMINDER] Reset is ONLY for local, un-pushed commits!" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host ""
exit 1
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,400 @@
# Module 06: Git Revert - Safe Undoing
## About This Module
Welcome to Module 06, where you'll learn the **safe, team-friendly way to undo changes** in Git. Unlike destructive commands that erase history, `git revert` creates new commits that undo previous changes while preserving the complete project history.
**Why revert is important:**
- ✅ Safe for shared/pushed commits
- ✅ Preserves complete history and audit trail
- ✅ Transparent to your team
- ✅ Can be undone itself if needed
- ✅ Works with any commit in history
**Key principle:** Revert doesn't erase mistakes—it documents how you fixed them.
## Learning Objectives
By completing this module, you will:
1. Revert commits safely while preserving surrounding changes
2. Understand how revert creates new commits instead of erasing history
3. Revert multiple commits at once
4. Know when to use revert vs. other undo strategies
## Prerequisites
Before starting this module, you should be comfortable with:
- Creating commits (`git commit`)
- Viewing commit history (`git log`)
- Understanding branches (Module 03)
## Setup
Run the setup script to create the challenge environment:
```pwsh
.\setup.ps1
```
This creates a `challenge/` directory with two branches demonstrating different revert scenarios:
- `regular-revert` - Basic commit reversion
- `multi-revert` - Multiple commit reversion
## Challenge 1: Reverting a Regular Commit
### Scenario
You're working on a calculator application. A developer added a `divide` function that crashes when dividing by zero. The bug was discovered after subsequent commits were made, so you can't just delete it—you need to revert it while keeping the commits that came after.
### Your Task
1. **Navigate to the challenge directory:**
```pwsh
cd challenge
```
2. **Check which branch you're on** (you should be on `regular-revert`):
```pwsh
git branch
```
The `*` should be next to `regular-revert`.
3. **View the commit history:**
```pwsh
git log --oneline
```
4. **Find the commit with message:** "Add broken divide function - needs to be reverted!"
- Note the commit hash (the 7-character code at the start, like `a1b2c3d`)
- Write it down or copy it
5. **Revert that specific commit** (replace `<commit-hash>` with the actual hash):
```pwsh
git revert <commit-hash>
```
6. **Visual Studio Code will open** with the revert commit message:
- The default message is fine (it says "Revert 'Add broken divide function...'")
- Close the editor window to accept the commit message
- Git will create the revert commit
### What to Observe
After reverting, check your work:
```pwsh
# View the new revert commit in history
git log --oneline
# Check that divide.py file is gone (reverted)
ls
# You should see calculator.py but NOT divide.py
# Check that modulo function still exists in calculator.py (it came after the bad commit)
cat calculator.py
# You should see def modulo
# Check that multiply function still exists (it came before the bad commit)
# (You already see it when you cat the file above)
```
**Key insight:** Revert creates a NEW commit that undoes the changes from the target commit, but leaves all other commits intact.
### Understanding the Timeline
```
Before revert:
main.py (initial) → multiply (good) → divide (BAD) → modulo (good)
We want to undo THIS
After revert:
main.py (initial) → multiply (good) → divide (BAD) → modulo (good) → revert divide (new commit)
Removes divide, keeps modulo
```
The revert commit adds a new point in history that undoes the divide changes.
## Challenge 2: Reverting Multiple Commits
### Scenario
Two separate commits added broken mathematical functions (`square_root` and `logarithm`). Both have critical bugs and need to be removed. You can revert multiple commits at once.
### Your Task
1. **Switch to the multi-revert branch:**
```pwsh
git switch multi-revert
```
2. **View the commit history:**
```pwsh
git log --oneline
```
Find the two bad commits:
- "Add broken square_root - REVERT THIS!"
- "Add broken logarithm - REVERT THIS TOO!"
Note both commit hashes (write them down)
3. **Revert both commits in one command** (replace with actual hashes):
```pwsh
git revert <commit-hash-1> <commit-hash-2>
```
**Important:** List commits from **oldest to newest** for cleanest history (square_root first, then logarithm).
**Alternatively**, revert them one at a time:
```pwsh
git revert <commit-hash-1>
git revert <commit-hash-2>
```
4. **Visual Studio Code will open TWICE** (once for each revert):
- Close the editor each time to accept the default commit message
- Git will create two revert commits
5. **Verify the result:**
```pwsh
# View files - sqrt.py and logarithm.py should be gone
ls
# You should see calculator.py but NOT sqrt.py or logarithm.py
# Check that good functions remain in calculator.py
cat calculator.py
# You should see def power and def absolute
```
### Multi-Revert Strategies
**Reverting a range of commits:**
```pwsh
# Revert commits from A to B (inclusive)
git revert A^..B
# Example: Revert last 3 commits
git revert HEAD~3..HEAD
```
**Reverting without auto-commit:**
```pwsh
# Stage revert changes without committing
git revert --no-commit <commit-hash>
# Review changes
git diff --staged
# Commit when ready
git commit
```
This is useful when reverting multiple commits and you want one combined revert commit.
## Verification
After completing both challenges, verify your solutions:
```pwsh
cd .. # Return to module directory (if you're in challenge/)
.\verify.ps1
```
Or from inside the challenge directory:
```pwsh
..\verify.ps1
```
The script checks that:
- ✅ Revert commits were created (not destructive deletion)
- ✅ Bad code is removed
- ✅ Good code before and after is preserved
## Command Reference
### Basic Revert
```pwsh
# Revert a specific commit
git revert <commit-hash>
# Revert the most recent commit
git revert HEAD
# Revert the second-to-last commit
git revert HEAD~1
```
### Reverting Old Commits
```pwsh
# Revert a specific commit from any point in history
git revert <commit-hash>
# Revert a commit from 5 commits ago
git revert HEAD~5
# View what a commit changed before reverting
git show <commit-hash>
```
### Multiple Commits
```pwsh
# Revert multiple specific commits
git revert <hash1> <hash2> <hash3>
# Revert a range of commits (oldest^..newest)
git revert <oldest-hash>^..<newest-hash>
# Revert last 3 commits
git revert HEAD~3..HEAD
```
### Revert Options
```pwsh
# Revert but don't commit automatically
git revert --no-commit <commit-hash>
# Revert and edit the commit message
git revert --edit <commit-hash>
# Revert without opening editor (use default message)
git revert --no-edit <commit-hash>
# Abort a revert in progress (if conflicts)
git revert --abort
# Continue revert after resolving conflicts
git revert --continue
```
## When to Use Git Revert
Use `git revert` when:
- ✅ **Commits are already pushed** - Safe for shared history
- ✅ **Working in a team** - Transparent to everyone
- ✅ **Need audit trail** - Shows what was undone and why
- ✅ **Public repositories** - Can't rewrite public history
- ✅ **Undoing old commits** - Can revert commits from weeks ago
- ✅ **Production hotfixes** - Safe emergency rollback
**Golden Rule:** If others might have your commits, use revert.
## When NOT to Use Git Revert
Consider alternatives when:
- ❌ **Commits are still local** - Use `git reset` instead (advanced module)
- ❌ **Just want to edit a commit** - Use `git commit --amend`
- ❌ **Haven't pushed yet** - Reset is cleaner for local cleanup, but more dangerous, stick to revert if in doubt
- ❌ **Need to combine commits** - Use interactive rebase IF nothing has been pushed to cloud
- ❌ **Reverting creates complex conflicts** - Might need manual fix forward
## Revert vs. Reset vs. Rebase
| Command | History | Safety | Use Case |
|---------|---------|--------|----------|
| **revert** | Preserves | ✅ Safe | Undo pushed commits |
| **reset** | Erases | ⚠️ Dangerous | Clean up local commits |
| **rebase** | Rewrites | ⚠️ Dangerous | Polish commit history |
**This module teaches revert.** You'll learn reset in Module 06.
## Handling Revert Conflicts
Sometimes reverting causes conflicts if subsequent changes touched the same code:
```pwsh
# Start revert
git revert <commit-hash>
# If conflicts occur:
# Conflict in calculator.py
# CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in calculator.py
```
**To resolve:**
1. Open conflicted files and fix conflicts (look for `<<<<<<<` markers)
2. Stage resolved files:
```pwsh
git add <resolved-files>
```
3. Continue the revert:
```pwsh
git revert --continue
```
Or abort if you change your mind:
```pwsh
git revert --abort
```
## Common Mistakes
### 1. Using Reset on Pushed Commits
```pwsh
# ❌ NEVER do this with pushed commits. Or at least try your best to avoid it.
git reset --hard HEAD~3
# ✅ Do this instead
git revert HEAD~3..HEAD
```
### 2. Reverting Commits in Wrong Order
When reverting multiple related commits, revert from newest to oldest:
```pwsh
# If you have: A → B → C (and C depends on B)
# ✅ Correct order
git revert C
git revert B
# ❌ Wrong order (may cause conflicts)
git revert B # Conflict! C still references B
git revert C
```
## Best Practices
1. **Write clear revert messages:**
```pwsh
git revert <hash> -m "Revert authentication - security issue #1234"
```
2. **Link to issue tracking:**
```
Revert "Add new payment system"
This reverts commit abc123.
Critical bug in payment processing.
See bug tracker: ISSUE-1234
```
3. **Test after reverting:**
- Run your test suite
- Verify the application still works
- Check no unintended changes occurred
4. **Communicate with team:**
- Announce reverts in team chat
- Explain why the revert was necessary
- Provide timeline for re-introducing the feature
5. **Keep reverts focused:**
- Revert the minimum necessary
- Don't bundle multiple unrelated reverts
- One problem = one revert commit

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
to create a fresh challenge environment.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Resetting Module 06: Git Reset Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`n=== Resetting Module 06: Git Revert Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the Module 06 challenge environment for learning git revert.
.DESCRIPTION
This script creates a challenge directory with two branches demonstrating
different revert scenarios:
- regular-revert: Basic revert of a single bad commit
- multi-revert: Reverting multiple commits at once
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Setting up Module 06: Git Revert Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Remove existing challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
}
# Create fresh challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Green
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize Git repository
Write-Host "Initializing Git repository..." -ForegroundColor Green
git init | Out-Null
# Configure git for this repository
git config user.name "Workshop Student"
git config user.email "student@example.com"
# Detect the default branch name after first commit (created below)
# Will be detected after the initial commit in SCENARIO 1
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 1: Regular Revert (Basic)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 1: Creating regular-revert branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Initial commit
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial calculator implementation" | Out-Null
# Detect the main branch name after first commit
$mainBranch = git branch --show-current
if (-not $mainBranch) {
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) { $mainBranch = "main" }
}
Write-Host "Default branch detected: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
# Create regular-revert branch
git switch -c regular-revert | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add multiply using append
$multiplyFunc = @"
def multiply(a, b):
"""Multiply two numbers."""
return a * b
"@
Add-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $multiplyFunc
git add .
git commit -m "Add multiply function" | Out-Null
# BAD commit: Add broken divide function using separate file
$divideContent = @"
# divide.py - Division functionality
def divide(a, b):
"""Divide a by b - BROKEN: doesn't handle division by zero!"""
return a / b # This will crash if b is 0!
"@
Set-Content -Path "divide.py" -Value $divideContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add broken divide function - needs to be reverted!" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add modulo (after bad commit) using append
$moduloFunc = @"
def modulo(a, b):
"""Return remainder of a divided by b."""
return a % b
"@
Add-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $moduloFunc
git add .
git commit -m "Add modulo function" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] regular-revert branch with bad divide commit" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 2: Multi Revert (Multiple Bad Commits)
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`nScenario 2: Creating multi-revert branch..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Switch back to main
git switch $mainBranch | Out-Null
# Create multi-revert branch
git switch -c multi-revert | Out-Null
# Reset calculator to simple version
$calcContent = @"
# calculator.py - Simple calculator
def add(a, b):
"""Add two numbers."""
return a + b
def subtract(a, b):
"""Subtract b from a."""
return a - b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calcContent
git add .
git commit -m "Reset to basic calculator" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add power function using append
$powerFunc = @"
def power(a, b):
"""Raise a to the power of b."""
return a ** b
"@
Add-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $powerFunc
git add .
git commit -m "Add power function" | Out-Null
# BAD commit 1: Add broken square_root in separate file
$sqrtContent = @"
# sqrt.py - Square root functionality
def square_root(a):
"""BROKEN: Returns wrong result for negative numbers!"""
return a ** 0.5 # This returns NaN for negative numbers!
"@
Set-Content -Path "sqrt.py" -Value $sqrtContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add broken square_root - REVERT THIS!" | Out-Null
# BAD commit 2: Add broken logarithm in separate file
$logContent = @"
# logarithm.py - Logarithm functionality
def logarithm(a):
"""BROKEN: Doesn't handle zero or negative numbers!"""
import math
return math.log(a) # This crashes for a <= 0!
"@
Set-Content -Path "logarithm.py" -Value $logContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add broken logarithm - REVERT THIS TOO!" | Out-Null
# Good commit: Add absolute value (after bad commits) using append
$absoluteFunc = @"
def absolute(a):
"""Return absolute value of a."""
return abs(a)
"@
Add-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $absoluteFunc
git add .
git commit -m "Add absolute value function" | Out-Null
Write-Host "[CREATED] multi-revert branch with two bad commits to revert" -ForegroundColor Green
# ============================================================================
# Return to regular-revert to start
# ============================================================================
git switch regular-revert | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n=== Setup Complete! ===" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nTwo revert scenarios have been created:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. regular-revert - Revert a single bad commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. multi-revert - Revert multiple bad commits" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nYou are currently on the 'regular-revert' branch." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nNext steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Read the README.md for detailed instructions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Complete each revert challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Run '..\verify.ps1' to check your solutions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""

View File

@@ -1,16 +1,15 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the Module 05 challenge solutions.
Verifies the Module 06 challenge solutions.
.DESCRIPTION
Checks that all three revert scenarios have been completed correctly:
Checks that both revert scenarios have been completed correctly:
- regular-revert: Single commit reverted
- merge-revert: Merge commit reverted with -m flag
- multi-revert: Multiple commits reverted
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying Module 05: Git Revert Solutions ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying Module 06: Git Revert Solutions ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
$allChecksPassed = $true
$originalDir = Get-Location
@@ -51,19 +50,19 @@ if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that calculator.py exists
# Check that divide.py is removed (was reverted)
if (-not (Test-Path "divide.py")) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Broken divide.py successfully reverted (file removed)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] divide.py still exists (should be reverted)" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] The bad commit should be reverted, removing divide.py" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that calculator.py exists and has correct content
if (Test-Path "calculator.py") {
$calcContent = Get-Content "calculator.py" -Raw
# Check that divide function is NOT in the code (was reverted)
if ($calcContent -notmatch "def divide") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Broken divide function successfully reverted" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] divide function still exists (should be reverted)" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] The bad commit should be reverted, removing the divide function" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that modulo function still exists (should be preserved)
if ($calcContent -match "def modulo") {
Write-Host "[PASS] modulo function preserved (good commit after bad one)" -ForegroundColor Green
@@ -87,60 +86,9 @@ if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
}
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 2: Merge Revert Verification
# SCENARIO 2: Multi Revert Verification
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`n=== Scenario 2: Merge Revert ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch merge-revert 2>&1 | Out-Null
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] merge-revert branch not found" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
} else {
# Check that a revert commit for the merge exists
$revertMerge = git log --oneline --grep="Revert.*Merge" 2>$null
if ($revertMerge) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Merge revert commit found" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No merge revert commit found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Use: git revert -m 1 <merge-commit-hash>" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that the original merge commit still exists (revert doesn't erase it)
$mergeCommit = git log --merges --oneline --grep="Merge feature-auth" 2>$null
if ($mergeCommit) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Original merge commit still in history (not erased)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[INFO] Original merge commit not found (this is OK if you used a different approach)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# Check that auth.py no longer exists or its effects are reverted
if (-not (Test-Path "auth.py")) {
Write-Host "[PASS] auth.py removed (merge reverted successfully)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[INFO] auth.py still exists (check if merge was fully reverted)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# Check that calculator.py exists
if (Test-Path "calculator.py") {
$calcContent = Get-Content "calculator.py" -Raw
# After reverting the merge, calculator shouldn't import auth
if ($calcContent -notmatch "from auth import") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Auth integration reverted from calculator.py" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] calculator.py still imports auth (merge not fully reverted)" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Reverting the merge should remove the auth integration" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
}
}
# ============================================================================
# SCENARIO 3: Multi Revert Verification
# ============================================================================
Write-Host "`n=== Scenario 3: Multi Revert ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`n=== Scenario 2: Multi Revert ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
git switch multi-revert 2>&1 | Out-Null
@@ -160,26 +108,26 @@ if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that sqrt.py is removed (reverted)
if (-not (Test-Path "sqrt.py")) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Broken sqrt.py successfully reverted (file removed)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] sqrt.py still exists (should be reverted)" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that logarithm.py is removed (reverted)
if (-not (Test-Path "logarithm.py")) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Broken logarithm.py successfully reverted (file removed)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] logarithm.py still exists (should be reverted)" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check calculator.py content
if (Test-Path "calculator.py") {
$calcContent = Get-Content "calculator.py" -Raw
# Check that square_root is NOT in code (reverted)
if ($calcContent -notmatch "def square_root") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Broken square_root function reverted" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] square_root function still exists (should be reverted)" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that logarithm is NOT in code (reverted)
if ($calcContent -notmatch "def logarithm") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Broken logarithm function reverted" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] logarithm function still exists (should be reverted)" -ForegroundColor Red
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check that power function still exists (good commit before bad ones)
if ($calcContent -match "def power") {
Write-Host "[PASS] power function preserved" -ForegroundColor Green
@@ -211,11 +159,10 @@ if ($allChecksPassed) {
Write-Host "=========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou've mastered git revert!" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "You now understand:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " ✓ Reverting regular commits safely" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Reverting merge commits with -m flag" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Reverting commits safely without erasing history" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Reverting multiple commits at once" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " ✓ Preserving history while undoing changes" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nReady for Module 06: Git Reset!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host " ✓ Preserving all other commits while undoing specific changes" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nReady for Module 07: Git Reset!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host ""
exit 0
} else {

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Module 11: Stash
# Module 07: Git Stash - Temporary Storage
## Learning Objectives
@@ -64,12 +64,112 @@ stash@{2} <- Oldest stash
You can have multiple stashes and apply any of them.
## Useful Commands
## Setup
```bash
# Stash current changes
Run the setup script to create the challenge environment:
```pwsh
.\setup.ps1
```
This creates a `challenge/` directory where you're working on a login feature with uncommitted changes, and a critical bug needs fixing on main.
## Your Task
### The Scenario
You're working on a login feature on the `feature-login` branch. Your work is incomplete (has TODOs), so it's not ready to commit.
Suddenly, your teammate reports a **critical security bug** in production! You need to:
1. Temporarily save your incomplete work
2. Switch to the main branch
3. Fix the urgent bug
4. Return to your feature and continue working
### Step-by-Step Instructions
1. **Navigate to the challenge directory:**
```pwsh
cd challenge
```
2. **Check your current status:**
```pwsh
git status
```
You should see modified `login.py` (uncommitted changes)
3. **Stash your work with a message:**
```pwsh
git stash save "WIP: login feature"
```
4. **Verify working directory is clean:**
```pwsh
git status
```
Should say "nothing to commit, working tree clean"
5. **Switch to main branch:**
```pwsh
git switch main
```
6. **Open app.py and find the bug:**
```pwsh
cat app.py
```
Look for the comment "# BUG: This allows unauthenticated access!"
7. **Fix the bug** by editing app.py:
- Remove the buggy comment line
- You can leave the implementation as-is or improve it
- The important thing is removing the comment that says "allows unauthenticated access"
8. **Commit the fix:**
```pwsh
git add app.py
git commit -m "Fix critical security bug"
```
9. **Switch back to your feature branch:**
```pwsh
git switch feature-login
```
10. **Restore your stashed work:**
```pwsh
git stash pop
```
This applies the stash and removes it from the stash stack
11. **Complete the TODOs in login.py:**
- Open login.py in your editor
- Complete the login method (verify password and return session)
- Add a logout method
- Remove all TODO comments
12. **Commit your completed feature:**
```pwsh
git add login.py
git commit -m "Complete login feature"
```
13. **Verify your solution:**
```pwsh
..\verify.ps1
```
## Key Stash Commands
### Basic Operations
```pwsh
# Stash current changes with a message
git stash save "description"
# Stash without a message (not recommended)
git stash
git stash save "description" # With a descriptive message
# Stash including untracked files
git stash -u
@@ -77,7 +177,17 @@ git stash -u
# List all stashes
git stash list
# Apply most recent stash and remove it from stack
# Show what's in the most recent stash
git stash show
# Show full diff of stash
git stash show -p
```
### Applying Stashes
```pwsh
# Apply most recent stash and remove it (RECOMMENDED)
git stash pop
# Apply most recent stash but keep it in stack
@@ -86,114 +196,192 @@ git stash apply
# Apply a specific stash
git stash apply stash@{1}
# Show what's in a stash
git stash show
git stash show -p # Show full diff
# Apply a specific stash by number
git stash apply 1
```
# Drop (delete) a stash
git stash drop stash@{0}
### Managing Stashes
```pwsh
# Drop (delete) the most recent stash
git stash drop
# Drop a specific stash
git stash drop stash@{1}
# Clear all stashes
git stash clear
# Create a branch from a stash
# Create a new branch from a stash
git stash branch new-branch-name
```
## Understanding Stash vs Pop vs Apply
### Stash Pop (Recommended)
```pwsh
git stash pop
```
- Applies the stash to your working directory
- **Removes** the stash from the stack
- Use this most of the time
### Stash Apply (Keep Stash)
```pwsh
git stash apply
```
- Applies the stash to your working directory
- **Keeps** the stash in the stack
- Useful if you want to apply the same changes to multiple branches
### When to Use Which
**Use `pop` when:**
- You're done with the stash and won't need it again (99% of the time)
- You want to keep your stash list clean
**Use `apply` when:**
- You want to test the same changes on different branches
- You're not sure if you want to keep the stash yet
## Verification
Run the verification script to check your solution:
```bash
```pwsh
..\verify.ps1
```
Or from the module directory:
```pwsh
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification will check that:
- The bug fix commit exists on main
- Your feature is completed on the feature branch
- Changes were properly stashed and restored
- No uncommitted changes remain
- ✅ The bug fix commit exists on main
- ✅ Your feature is completed on the feature-login branch
- ✅ All TODOs are removed from login.py
- ✅ No uncommitted changes remain
## Challenge Steps
## Troubleshooting
1. Navigate to the challenge directory
2. You're on feature-login with uncommitted changes
3. Check status: `git status` (you'll see modified files)
4. Stash your changes: `git stash save "WIP: login feature"`
5. Verify working directory is clean: `git status`
6. Switch to main: `git switch main`
7. View the bug in app.js and fix it (remove the incorrect line)
8. Commit the fix: `git add app.js && git commit -m "Fix critical security bug"`
9. Switch back to feature: `git switch feature-login`
10. Restore your work: `git stash pop`
11. Complete the feature (the TODOs in login.js)
12. Commit your completed feature
13. Run verification
### "Cannot switch branches - you have uncommitted changes"
## Tips
**Problem:** Git won't let you switch branches with uncommitted changes.
- Always use `git stash save "message"` to describe what you're stashing
- Use `git stash list` to see all your stashes
- `git stash pop` applies and removes the stash (use this most often)
- `git stash apply` keeps the stash (useful if you want to apply it to multiple branches)
- Stashes are local - they don't get pushed to remote repositories
- You can stash even if you have changes to different files
- Stash before pulling to avoid merge conflicts
- Use `git stash show -p` to preview what's in a stash before applying
**Solution:**
```pwsh
# Stash your changes first
git stash save "work in progress"
## Common Stash Scenarios
# Now you can switch
git switch other-branch
### Scenario 1: Quick Branch Switch
```bash
# Working on feature, need to switch to main
git stash
git switch main
# Do work on main
git switch feature
# When you come back, restore your work
git switch original-branch
git stash pop
```
### Scenario 2: Pull with Local Changes
```bash
# You have local changes but need to pull
git stash
git pull
git stash pop
# Resolve any conflicts
### "I don't remember what's in my stash"
**Problem:** You stashed something but forgot what it was.
**Solution:**
```pwsh
# List all stashes
git stash list
# Show summary of what changed
git stash show stash@{0}
# Show full diff
git stash show -p stash@{0}
```
### Scenario 3: Experimental Changes
```bash
# Try something experimental
git stash # Save current work
# Make experimental changes
# Decide you don't like it
git restore . # Discard experiment
git stash pop # Restore original work
```
### "Stash conflicts when I apply"
### Scenario 4: Apply to Multiple Branches
```bash
# Same fix needed on multiple branches
git stash
git switch branch1
git stash apply
git commit -am "Apply fix"
git switch branch2
git stash apply
git commit -am "Apply fix"
git stash drop # Clean up when done
```
**Problem:** Applying a stash causes merge conflicts.
## Stash Conflicts
If applying a stash causes conflicts:
1. Git will mark the conflicts in your files
2. Resolve conflicts manually (like merge conflicts)
**Solution:**
1. Git marks conflicts in your files with `<<<<<<<` markers
2. Open the files and resolve conflicts manually
3. Stage the resolved files: `git add <file>`
4. The stash is automatically dropped after successful pop
4. If you used `pop`, the stash is automatically dropped
5. If you used `apply`, manually drop it: `git stash drop`
## What You'll Learn
### "I accidentally cleared my stash"
Git stash is an essential tool for managing context switches in your daily workflow. It lets you maintain a clean working directory while preserving incomplete work, making it easy to handle interruptions, urgent fixes, and quick branch switches. Mastering stash makes you more efficient and helps avoid the temptation to make "WIP" commits just to switch branches. Think of stash as your temporary workspace that follows you around.
**Problem:** You deleted a stash you still needed.
**Unfortunately:** Stashes are hard to recover once deleted. Lessons learned:
- Use `git stash pop` instead of `git stash drop` when you're unsure
- Use `git stash show -p` to preview before dropping
- Consider committing work instead of stashing for important changes
## Tips for Success
💡 **Always add a message** - `git stash save "your message"` helps you remember what you stashed
💡 **Use pop, not apply** - Pop removes the stash automatically, keeping your stash list clean
💡 **Stash before pulling** - Avoid merge conflicts when pulling updates
💡 **Preview before applying** - Use `git stash show -p` to see what's in a stash
💡 **Stashes are local** - They don't get pushed to remote repositories
💡 **Clean working directory** - Always verify with `git status` after stashing
## Common Use Cases
### Quick Branch Switch
```pwsh
# You're working on feature-A
git stash save "feature A progress"
git switch hotfix-branch
# Fix the issue, commit
git switch feature-A
git stash pop
```
### Pull with Local Changes
```pwsh
# You have uncommitted changes
git stash save "local changes"
git pull
git stash pop
# Resolve conflicts if any
```
### Test Clean State
```pwsh
# Stash changes to test on clean code
git stash save "testing clean state"
# Run tests
git stash pop # Restore your changes
```
## What You've Learned
After completing this module, you understand:
- ✅ Stash temporarily saves uncommitted changes
- ✅ Stash lets you switch contexts without committing
- ✅ `git stash pop` applies and removes the stash
- ✅ `git stash apply` applies but keeps the stash
- ✅ Stashes are local and not pushed to remote
- ✅ Stash is essential for handling interruptions and urgent fixes
**Key Takeaway:** Stash is your "temporary clipboard" for incomplete work. It helps you stay productive when you need to context-switch without making messy "WIP" commits.
## Next Steps
Ready to continue? You've now mastered the essential Git commands for daily development:
- Committing and history
- Branching and merging
- Cherry-picking specific changes
- Safely reverting commits
- Temporarily stashing work
Move on to **Module 08: Multiplayer Git** to practice collaborating with others!
To start over:
```pwsh
.\reset.ps1
```

View File

@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ git init | Out-Null
git config user.name "Workshop User" | Out-Null
git config user.email "user@workshop.local" | Out-Null
# Detect the default branch name after first commit (created below)
# Will be detected after the initial commit
# Create initial application on main
$app = @"
class Application:
@@ -45,6 +48,14 @@ Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $app
git add app.py
git commit -m "Initial application" | Out-Null
# Detect the main branch name after first commit
$mainBranch = git branch --show-current
if (-not $mainBranch) {
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) { $mainBranch = "main" }
}
Write-Host "Default branch detected: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$readme = @"
# MyApp
@@ -78,7 +89,7 @@ git add login.py
git commit -m "Start login service implementation" | Out-Null
# Add a critical bug to main branch (simulating a bug that was introduced)
git checkout main | Out-Null
git checkout $mainBranch | Out-Null
$appWithBug = @"
class Application:
@@ -140,16 +151,17 @@ Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nSituation:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "You're working on the login feature (feature-login branch)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "You have uncommitted changes - the feature is NOT complete yet" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nUrgent: A critical security bug was found in production (main branch)!" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "`nUrgent: A critical security bug was found in production ($mainBranch branch)!" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "You need to fix it immediately, but your current work isn't ready to commit." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "`nDetected main branch: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nYour task:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "1. Navigate to the challenge directory: cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "2. Check your status: git status (see uncommitted changes)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "3. Stash your work: git stash save 'WIP: login feature'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. Switch to main: git checkout main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. Switch to ${mainBranch}: git switch $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "5. Fix the security bug in app.py (remove the comment and fix the auth)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "6. Commit the fix: git add app.py && git commit -m 'Fix critical security bug'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "7. Switch back: git checkout feature-login" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "7. Switch back: git switch feature-login" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "8. Restore your work: git stash pop" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "9. Complete the TODOs in login.py" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "10. Commit your completed feature" -ForegroundColor White

View File

@@ -32,6 +32,21 @@ if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
exit 1
}
# Detect the main branch name
$allBranches = git branch --list 2>$null | ForEach-Object { $_.Trim('* ') }
if ($allBranches -contains "main") {
$mainBranch = "main"
} elseif ($allBranches -contains "master") {
$mainBranch = "master"
} else {
$mainBranch = git config --get init.defaultBranch
if (-not $mainBranch) {
$mainBranch = $allBranches | Select-Object -First 1
if (-not $mainBranch) { $mainBranch = "main" }
}
}
Write-Host "Detected main branch: $mainBranch" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check current branch
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -ne "feature-login") {
@@ -53,14 +68,22 @@ if ($status) {
}
# Verify main branch has the security fix
Write-Host "`nChecking main branch for bug fix..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
git checkout main 2>$null | Out-Null
Write-Host "`nChecking $mainBranch branch for bug fix..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
git checkout $mainBranch 2>$null | Out-Null
# Check for bug fix commit
$mainCommits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" main 2>$null
if ($mainCommits -notmatch "security bug|Fix.*bug|security fix") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No security bug fix commit found on main branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: After stashing, switch to main and commit a bug fix" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$mainCommits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" $mainBranch 2>$null
$hasSecurityFix = $false
foreach ($commit in $mainCommits) {
if ($commit -match "security|Fix.*bug") {
$hasSecurityFix = $true
break
}
}
if (-not $hasSecurityFix) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No security bug fix commit found on $mainBranch branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: After stashing, switch to $mainBranch and commit a bug fix" -ForegroundColor Yellow
git checkout feature-login 2>$null | Out-Null
Set-Location ..
exit 1
@@ -68,7 +91,7 @@ if ($mainCommits -notmatch "security bug|Fix.*bug|security fix") {
# Check that app.py has been fixed
if (-not (Test-Path "app.py")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] app.py not found on main branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[FAIL] app.py not found on $mainBranch branch." -ForegroundColor Red
git checkout feature-login 2>$null | Out-Null
Set-Location ..
exit 1
@@ -113,7 +136,7 @@ if (-not (Test-Path "login.py")) {
$loginContent = Get-Content "login.py" -Raw
# Check that login method exists and is implemented
if ($loginContent -notmatch "login\(username, password\)") {
if ($loginContent -notmatch "def login") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] login.py should have a login method." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
# Facilitator Setup Guide
This guide helps workshop facilitators set up the cloud-based multiplayer Git module using Azure DevOps.
## Overview
The Number Challenge is a collaborative Git exercise where students work together on a shared repository hosted on **Azure DevOps**.
**What participants will do:**
- Clone a real repository from Azure DevOps
- Collaborate to sort numbers 0-20 into the correct order
- Experience push/pull workflow and merge conflicts
- Learn to communicate and coordinate with teammates
- Use SSH keys for secure authentication
---
## Prerequisites
### Azure DevOps Setup
You need:
- **Azure DevOps Organization** - Free tier is sufficient
- Sign up at [dev.azure.com](https://dev.azure.com)
- **Project created** within your organization
- **Admin access** to create repositories and manage users
### Workshop Materials
Participants need:
- Git installed (version 2.23+)
- VS Code (or any text editor)
- SSH keys configured
---
## Pre-Workshop Setup
### Step 1: Add User Accounts
Add workshop participants to your Azure DevOps organization.
1. Navigate to **Organization Settings****Users**
2. Click **Add users**
3. Enter participant email addresses (Microsoft accounts)
4. Select your workshop project
5. Select **Access level**: Stakeholder (free) or Basic
6. Click **Add**
### Step 2: Create the Repository
Create the shared repository: **number-challenge**
1. Sign in to Azure DevOps at [dev.azure.com](https://dev.azure.com)
2. Navigate to your **Project**
3. Click **Repos** in the left navigation
4. Click the repo dropdown → **New repository**
5. Fill in details:
- **Name:** `number-challenge`
- **Add a README:** Checked
6. Click **Create**
### Step 3: Add the Starter File
Create `numbers.txt` with numbers 0-20 in random order.
**Option A: Via Azure DevOps web UI**
1. In your repository, click **+ New** → **File**
2. Name it `numbers.txt`
3. Add this content (numbers 0-20 shuffled):
```
17
3
12
8
19
1
14
6
11
0
20
9
4
16
2
18
7
13
5
15
10
```
4. Click **Commit**
**Option B: Via command line**
```powershell
git clone git@ssh.dev.azure.com:v3/{organization}/{project}/number-challenge
cd number-challenge
# Create numbers.txt with shuffled numbers
@"
17
3
12
8
19
1
14
6
11
0
20
9
4
16
2
18
7
13
5
15
10
"@ | Out-File -FilePath numbers.txt -Encoding UTF8
git add numbers.txt
git commit -m "feat: add shuffled numbers for challenge"
git push
```
### Step 4: Verify Student Access
Students added to the project automatically have access. Verify:
1. Go to **Project Settings****Repositories****number-challenge**
2. Click **Security** tab
3. Verify project team has **Contribute** permission
---
## During the Workshop
### Getting Started
1. Ensure all students have cloned the repository
2. Have everyone open `numbers.txt` to see the shuffled numbers
3. Explain the goal: sort numbers 0-20 into correct order
### The Exercise Flow
1. **Students pull** the latest changes
2. **One person** moves a number to its correct position
3. **They commit and push**
4. **Others pull** and see the change
5. **Repeat** until sorted
### Creating Conflicts (The Learning Moment)
Conflicts happen naturally when multiple people edit at once. You can encourage this:
- Have two students deliberately edit at the same time
- Watch them experience the push rejection
- Guide them through pulling and resolving the conflict
### Monitoring Progress
Check progress in Azure DevOps:
- **Repos → Commits**: See who's contributing
- **Repos → Files → numbers.txt**: See current state
### Common Issues
**"I can't push!"**
- Did they pull first? Run `git pull`
- Is SSH set up? Check with `ssh -T git@ssh.dev.azure.com`
**"Merge conflict!"**
- Walk them through removing conflict markers
- Help them understand both sides of the conflict
**"Numbers are duplicated/missing!"**
- Someone resolved a conflict incorrectly
- Have the team review and fix together
---
## Success
When complete, `numbers.txt` should contain:
```
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
```
Celebrate the team's success!
---
## Post-Workshop Cleanup
To reuse the repository:
1. Reset `numbers.txt` to shuffled state
2. Or delete and recreate the repository
---
## Tips
- **Keep groups small** (2 people per repository) for more interaction
- **Encourage communication** - the exercise works best when people talk
- **Let conflicts happen** - they're the best learning opportunity

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
# Azure DevOps SSH Setup - Best Practices Guide
This guide provides comprehensive instructions for setting up SSH authentication with Azure DevOps. SSH is the recommended authentication method for secure Git operations.
## Why SSH is Best Practice
SSH (Secure Shell) keys provide a secure way to authenticate with Azure DevOps without exposing passwords or tokens. Here's why SSH is the security best practice:
**Security Benefits:**
- **No Password Exposure**: Your credentials never travel over the network
- **Strong Encryption**: Uses RSA cryptographic algorithms
- **No Credential Prompts**: Seamless authentication after initial setup
- **Revocable**: Individual keys can be removed without changing passwords
- **Auditable**: Track which key was used for each operation
---
## Prerequisites
Before starting, ensure you have:
- **Git 2.23 or higher** installed
```powershell
git --version
```
- **Azure DevOps account** with access to your organization/project
- If you don't have one, create a free account at [dev.azure.com](https://dev.azure.com)
- **PowerShell 7+ or Bash terminal** for running commands
```powershell
pwsh --version
```
---
## Step 1: Generate SSH Key Pair
SSH authentication uses a key pair: a private key (stays on your computer) and a public key (uploaded to Azure DevOps).
### Generate RSA Key
Open your terminal and run:
```powershell
ssh-keygen -t rsa
```
**Note about RSA:** Azure DevOps currently only supports RSA SSH keys. While newer algorithms like Ed25519 offer better security and performance, they are not yet supported by Azure DevOps. See the note at the end of this guide for more information.
### Save Location
When prompted for the file location, press `Enter` to accept the default:
```
Enter file in which to save the key (/Users/yourname/.ssh/id_rsa):
```
**Default locations:**
- **Windows**: `C:\Users\YourName\.ssh\id_rsa` and `C:\Users\YourName\.ssh\id_rsa.pub`
### Passphrase (Optional but Recommended)
You'll be prompted to enter a passphrase, just press `Enter` no password is needed (recommended but not needed):
```
Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase):
Enter same passphrase again:
```
### Verify Key Generation
Check that your keys were created:
**Windows PowerShell:**
```powershell
dir $HOME\.ssh\
```
You should see two files:
- `id_rsa` - Private key (NEVER share this)
- `id_rsa.pub` - Public key (safe to share for upload to Azure DevOps)
---
## Step 2: Add SSH Public Key to Azure DevOps
Now you'll upload your public key to Azure DevOps.
### Navigate to SSH Public Keys Settings
1. Sign in to Azure DevOps at [https://dev.azure.com](https://dev.azure.com)
2. Click your **profile icon** in the top-right corner
3. Select **User settings** from the dropdown menu
4. Click **SSH Public Keys**
![Azure DevOps - User Settings Menu](./images/02_ssh_option.png)
*Navigate to your user settings by clicking the profile icon in the top-right corner*
### Add New SSH Key
5. Click the **+ New Key** button
![Azure DevOps - Add SSH Public Key Dialog](./images/03_add_new_key.png)
*Click '+ New Key' to begin adding your SSH public key*
### Copy Your Public Key
Open your terminal and display your public key:
**Linux/Mac:**
```bash
cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
```
**Windows PowerShell:**
```powershell
type $HOME\.ssh\id_rsa.pub
```
**Windows Command Prompt:**
```cmd
type %USERPROFILE%\.ssh\id_rsa.pub
```
The output will look like this:
```
ssh-rsa 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 your@email.com
```
**Copy the entire output** (from `ssh-rsa` to your email address).
### Paste and Name Your Key
![Azure DevOps - Add SSH Public Key Dialog](./images/04_copy_paste_key.png)
6. In the Azure DevOps dialog:
- **Name**: Give your key a descriptive name (e.g., "Workshop Laptop 2026", "Home Desktop", "Work MacBook")
- **Public Key Data**: Paste the entire public key you just copied
7. Click **Save**
**Naming tip**: Use names that help you identify which machine uses each key. This makes it easier to revoke keys later if needed.
---
## Step 3: Using SSH with Git
Now that SSH is configured, you can use it for all Git operations.
### Clone a Repository with SSH
To clone a repository using SSH:
```bash
git clone git@ssh.dev.azure.com:v3/{organization}/{project}/{repository}
```
**Example** (replace placeholders with your actual values):
```bash
git clone git@ssh.dev.azure.com:v3/myorg/git-workshop/great-print-project
```
**How to find your SSH URL:**
1. Navigate to your repository in Azure DevOps
![Azure DevOps - Repositories](./images/05_repos.png)
2. Click **Clone** in the top-right
3. Select **SSH** from the dropdown
4. Copy the SSH URL
![Azure DevOps - Get SSH Clone URL](./images/06_choose_ssh.png)
*Select SSH from the clone dialog to get your repository's SSH URL*
### Daily Git Operations
All standard Git commands now work seamlessly with SSH:
```bash
# Pull latest changes
git pull
# Push your commits
git push
# Fetch from remote
git fetch
# Push a new branch
git push -u origin feature-branch
```
**No more credential prompts!** SSH authentication happens automatically.
---
## Additional Resources
- **Azure DevOps SSH Documentation**: [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/use-ssh-keys-to-authenticate](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/use-ssh-keys-to-authenticate)
- **SSH Key Best Practices**: [https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ssh-keys](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ssh-keys)
- **Git with SSH**: [https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-on-the-Server-Generating-Your-SSH-Public-Key](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-on-the-Server-Generating-Your-SSH-Public-Key)
---
## Quick Reference
### Common Commands
```bash
# Generate RSA key
ssh-keygen -t
# Display public key (Linux/Mac)
cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
# Display public key (Windows)
type $HOME\.ssh\id_rsa.pub
# Clone with SSH
git clone git@ssh.dev.azure.com:v3/{org}/{project}/{repo}
# Check remote URL
git remote -v
```
### SSH URL Format
```
git@ssh.dev.azure.com:v3/{organization}/{project}/{repository}
```
**Example:**
```
git@ssh.dev.azure.com:v3/novenco/software/git-workshop
```
---
**You're all set!** SSH authentication with RSA keys is now configured for secure, passwordless Git operations with Azure DevOps.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
# Multiplayer Git
Work with others using branches and pull requests.
## Goal
Learn to collaborate on a shared repository using:
- **Branches** - work independently without breaking main
- **Pull Requests** - review and merge changes safely
## The Workflow
```
1. Create branch → 2. Make changes → 3. Push branch
6. Delete branch ← 5. Merge PR ← 4. Create PR
```
This is how professional teams work together on code.
---
## Step 1: Clone the Repository
Get the repository URL from your facilitator, then:
```powershell
git clone <repository-url>
code <repository-name>
```
---
## Step 2: Create a Branch
Never work directly on `main`. Create your own branch:
```powershell
git switch -c <branch>
```
This creates a new branch and switches to it.
---
## Step 3: Make Changes
1. Open `numbers.txt` in VS Code
2. Move one number to its correct position
3. Save the file (`Ctrl+S`)
---
## Step 4: Commit and Push
```powershell
git add .
git commit -m "fix: move 7 to correct position"
git push <branch-name>
```
Your branch is now on Azure DevOps.
---
## Step 5: Create a Pull Request
[Detailed guide](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/pull-requests?view=azure-devops&tabs=browser#create-a-pull-request)
1. Go to Azure DevOps in your browser
2. Navigate to **Repos****Pull Requests** 3. Click **New Pull Request**
4. Set:
- **Source branch:** `<branch-name>`
- **Target branch:** `main`
5. Add a title describing your change
6. Click **Create**
---
## Step 6: Review and Merge
1. Review the changes shown in the PR (Person B)
2. If everything looks good, click **Complete**
3. Select **Complete merge**
4. Your changes are now in `main`
---
## Step 7: Update Your Local Main
After merging, update your local copy:
```powershell
git switch main
git pull
```
---
## Step 8: Repeat
1. Create a new branch for your next change
2. Make changes, commit, push
3. Create another PR
4. Continue until all numbers are sorted
---
## Step 9: Create a merge conflict
1. Both people should create a branch with changes to `feature-1` and `feature-2`, you task is to change the position of number 5. Where you place it is up to you.
2. Now both people should push their respective branch `git push <the-branch>`
3. Now merge `feature-1` branch first, going throught the Pull Request flow.
4. Then merge `feature-2` branch second, and notice you'll get a MERGE CONFLICT.
5. It is not the owner of `feature-2` branch to resolve the conflict. This is done by merge the `main` branch into `feature-2` locally and so the owner of `feature-2` has to do the following
```pwsh
# First get the latest changes on main
git switch main
git pull
# Then go back to the branch you can from
git switch feature-2
# Now we resolve the merge. We're merging the main branch INTO the feature-2 branch.
git merge main
# Resolve the merge conflict in numbers.txt
# Once resolved
git add numbers.txt
git commit
# VSCode will open up with a default message of "Merge main into feature-2"
# finish the commit. And push the changes
git push
```
6. Now the owner of `feature-2` can checkout the pull request on azure again and see that the merge conflict has been resolved and can therefore "Complete" the merge request, using the button in the top right corner with the name "Complete"
## Quick Reference
| Command | What It Does |
|---------|--------------|
| `git switch -c <name>` | Create and switch to new branch |
| `git push -u origin <branch>` | Push branch to Azure DevOps |
| `git switch main` | Switch to main branch |
| `git pull` | Get latest changes from remote |
---
## Common Issues
### "My PR has conflicts"
1. Update your branch with latest main:
```powershell
git switch main
git pull
git switch <branch-name>
git merge main
```
2. Resolve conflicts in VS Code
3. Commit and push again
### "I need to make more changes to my PR"
Just commit and push to the same branch - the PR updates automatically:
```powershell
git add .
git commit -m "fix: address review feedback"
git push
```

View File

@@ -1,904 +0,0 @@
# Facilitator Setup Guide - The Great Print Project
This guide helps workshop facilitators set up the cloud-based multiplayer Git module.
## Overview
The Great Print Project is a collaborative Git exercise where pairs of students work together on a shared repository hosted on your Gitea server at **https://git.frod.dk/multiplayer**.
**What participants will do:**
- Clone a real repository from your server
- Collaborate with partners on shared branches
- Deliberately create and resolve merge conflicts
- Create pull requests and review code
- Experience the full collaborative Git workflow
---
## Prerequisites
### Gitea Server Setup
You should have:
- Gitea running at https://git.frod.dk/multiplayer
- Admin access to create repositories and users
- HTTPS or SSH access enabled for Git operations
**Need to set up Gitea?** See the main workshop's `GITEA-SETUP.md` for Docker + Cloudflare Tunnel instructions.
### Workshop Materials
Participants need:
- Access to the module README in `01_essentials/09-multiplayer/README.md`
- Git installed (version 2.23+)
- Python 3.6+ (to run the print project)
- Text editor
---
## Pre-Workshop Setup
### Step 1: Create User Accounts
Create individual Gitea accounts for each participant.
**Recommended naming:**
- `student01`, `student02`, `student03`, etc.
- Or use their real names/emails if preferred
**Two approaches:**
**Option A: Manual account creation**
1. Go to Gitea admin panel
2. Create users one by one
3. Set initial passwords (students can change later)
4. Provide credentials to students
**Option B: Self-registration** (if you trust your network)
1. Enable self-registration in Gitea settings
2. Provide registration URL to students
3. They create their own accounts
4. You verify and approve accounts
**Access tokens (recommended for HTTPS):**
- Have students create personal access tokens after logging in
- Settings → Applications → Generate New Token
- Token needs `repo` scope
- Students use token as password when pushing/pulling
### Step 2: Create the Repository
Create the shared repository: **great-print-project**
**Via Gitea web UI:**
1. Log in as admin or organization account
2. Click "+" → "New Repository"
3. **Name:** `great-print-project`
4. **Owner:** `multiplayer` (organization) or your admin account
5. **Visibility:** Private (only visible to students you add)
6. **Initialize:** Check "Initialize this repository with selected files"
7. **README:** Yes
8. **License:** None
9. **.gitignore:** Python
10. Click "Create Repository"
**Via command line (alternative):**
```bash
# Create local directory
mkdir great-print-project
cd great-print-project
# Initialize git
git init
# Add files (see Step 3)
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit: The Great Print Project"
# Create bare repo on server
ssh user@git.frod.dk
cd /path/to/gitea/repositories/multiplayer
git init --bare great-print-project.git
exit
# Push to server
git remote add origin git@git.frod.dk:multiplayer/great-print-project.git
git push -u origin main
```
### Step 3: Add Starter Code to Repository
Commit these four files to the repository:
#### File 1: main.py
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
The Great Print Project
A collaborative Git exercise
When everyone completes their assigned functions,
this program will print the complete alphabet and numbers!
"""
from letters import print_letters
from numbers import print_numbers
def main():
print("=" * 50)
print(" THE GREAT PRINT PROJECT")
print("=" * 50)
print("\nLetters:")
print_letters()
print() # New line after letters
print("\nNumbers:")
print_numbers()
print() # New line after numbers
print("\n" + "=" * 50)
print(" PROJECT COMPLETE!")
print("=" * 50)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
#### File 2: letters.py
```python
"""
Letter Printing Functions
Each pair completes their assigned functions.
Expected output: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
"""
def print_a():
"""Print letter A - EXAMPLE (already completed)"""
print("A", end=" ")
def print_b():
# TODO: Pair 1 - implement this function
pass
def print_c():
# TODO: Pair 1 - implement this function
pass
def print_d():
# TODO: Pair 1 - implement this function
pass
def print_e():
# TODO: Pair 2 - implement this function
pass
def print_f():
# TODO: Pair 2 - implement this function
pass
def print_g():
# TODO: Pair 2 - implement this function
pass
def print_h():
# TODO: Pair 3 - implement this function
pass
def print_i():
# TODO: Pair 3 - implement this function
pass
def print_j():
# TODO: Pair 3 - implement this function
pass
def print_k():
# TODO: Pair 4 - implement this function
pass
def print_l():
# TODO: Pair 4 - implement this function
pass
def print_m():
# TODO: Pair 4 - implement this function
pass
def print_n():
# TODO: Pair 5 - implement this function
pass
def print_o():
# TODO: Pair 5 - implement this function
pass
def print_p():
# TODO: Pair 5 - implement this function
pass
def print_q():
# TODO: Pair 6 - implement this function
pass
def print_r():
# TODO: Pair 6 - implement this function
pass
def print_s():
# TODO: Pair 6 - implement this function
pass
def print_t():
# TODO: Pair 7 - implement this function
pass
def print_u():
# TODO: Pair 7 - implement this function
pass
def print_v():
# TODO: Pair 7 - implement this function
pass
def print_w():
# TODO: Pair 8 - implement this function
pass
def print_x():
# TODO: Pair 8 - implement this function
pass
def print_y():
# TODO: Pair 8 - implement this function
pass
def print_z():
# TODO: Pair 9 - implement this function
pass
def print_letters():
"""Print all letters A-Z"""
print_a()
print_b()
print_c()
print_d()
print_e()
print_f()
print_g()
print_h()
print_i()
print_j()
print_k()
print_l()
print_m()
print_n()
print_o()
print_p()
print_q()
print_r()
print_s()
print_t()
print_u()
print_v()
print_w()
print_x()
print_y()
print_z()
```
#### File 3: numbers.py
```python
"""
Number Printing Functions
Each pair completes their assigned functions.
Expected output: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
"""
def print_0():
# TODO: Pair 9 - implement this function
pass
def print_1():
# TODO: Pair 10 - implement this function
pass
def print_2():
# TODO: Pair 10 - implement this function
pass
def print_3():
# TODO: Pair 10 - implement this function
pass
def print_4():
# TODO: Pair 11 - implement this function
pass
def print_5():
# TODO: Pair 11 - implement this function
pass
def print_6():
# TODO: Pair 11 - implement this function
pass
def print_7():
# TODO: Pair 12 - implement this function
pass
def print_8():
# TODO: Pair 12 - implement this function
pass
def print_9():
# TODO: Pair 12 - implement this function
pass
def print_numbers():
"""Print all numbers 0-9"""
print_0()
print_1()
print_2()
print_3()
print_4()
print_5()
print_6()
print_7()
print_8()
print_9()
```
#### File 4: assignments.md
```markdown
# Pair Assignments
## How This Works
Each pair is assigned 3 functions to implement. You'll work together on a shared branch.
**Important:** Check with your facilitator for your pair number and assignment!
---
## Assignments
### Pair 1
- **Functions:** `print_b()`, `print_c()`, `print_d()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-1-bcd`
### Pair 2
- **Functions:** `print_e()`, `print_f()`, `print_g()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-2-efg`
### Pair 3
- **Functions:** `print_h()`, `print_i()`, `print_j()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-3-hij`
### Pair 4
- **Functions:** `print_k()`, `print_l()`, `print_m()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-4-klm`
### Pair 5
- **Functions:** `print_n()`, `print_o()`, `print_p()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-5-nop`
### Pair 6
- **Functions:** `print_q()`, `print_r()`, `print_s()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-6-qrs`
### Pair 7
- **Functions:** `print_t()`, `print_u()`, `print_v()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-7-tuv`
### Pair 8
- **Functions:** `print_w()`, `print_x()`, `print_y()`
- **File:** `letters.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-8-wxy`
### Pair 9
- **Functions:** `print_z()`, `print_0()`, `print_1()`
- **Files:** `letters.py`, `numbers.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-9-z01`
### Pair 10
- **Functions:** `print_2()`, `print_3()`, `print_4()`
- **File:** `numbers.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-10-234`
### Pair 11
- **Functions:** `print_5()`, `print_6()`, `print_7()`
- **File:** `numbers.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-11-567`
### Pair 12
- **Functions:** `print_8()`, `print_9()`
- **File:** `numbers.py`
- **Branch:** `pair-12-89`
---
## Example Implementation
```python
def print_a():
"""Print letter A - EXAMPLE (already completed)"""
print("A", end=" ")
```
**Your functions should follow the same pattern:**
```python
def print_x():
"""Print letter/number X"""
print("X", end=" ")
```
---
## Testing
After implementing your functions, test with:
```bash
python main.py
```
You should see your letters/numbers in the output!
---
## Questions?
Ask your facilitator for:
- Your pair number
- Your Gitea credentials
- Help with authentication setup
- Any Git or Python issues
```
#### File 5: README.md (in repository)
```markdown
# The Great Print Project 🎯
A collaborative Git exercise for learning teamwork with version control!
## Goal
When everyone completes their assigned functions, running `python main.py` will print:
```
==================================================
THE GREAT PRINT PROJECT
==================================================
Letters:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Numbers:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
==================================================
PROJECT COMPLETE!
==================================================
```
## Your Mission
1. Find your pair assignment in `assignments.md`
2. Clone this repository
3. Create your feature branch
4. Implement your assigned functions
5. Practice collaboration: push, pull, resolve conflicts
6. Create a pull request
7. Celebrate when your code is merged!
## Quick Start
```bash
# Clone the repository
git clone https://git.frod.dk/multiplayer/great-print-project.git
cd great-print-project
# Check your assignment
cat assignments.md
# Create your branch (replace X with your pair number)
git switch -c pair-X-feature
# Edit your file (letters.py or numbers.py)
# Implement your functions
# Test it
python main.py
# Commit and push
git add .
git commit -m "Implement print_x() functions"
git push -u origin pair-X-feature
```
## Files
- **main.py** - Orchestrator (runs the whole program)
- **letters.py** - Functions for printing A-Z
- **numbers.py** - Functions for printing 0-9
- **assignments.md** - See which functions your pair should implement
## Need Help?
See the module README in the workshop repository for detailed step-by-step instructions!
**Happy Collaborating! 🚀**
```
**Commit these files:**
```bash
git add main.py letters.py numbers.py assignments.md README.md
git commit -m "Add Great Print Project starter code"
git push origin main
```
### Step 4: Grant Student Access
Add students as collaborators with write access:
**Via Gitea web UI:**
1. Go to repository → Settings → Collaborators
2. Add each student account
3. Set permission level: **Write** (allows push, pull, branch creation)
**Important:** Students need **Write** access to:
- Create branches
- Push commits
- Create pull requests
### Step 5: Configure Branch Protection (Optional)
To prevent accidental pushes to main:
1. Repository → Settings → Branches
2. Add protection rule for `main` branch
3. Settings:
- **Block direct pushes:** Yes (requires pull requests)
- **Require PR reviews:** Optional (you can review PRs yourself)
- **Auto-merge:** Disabled (you merge manually or students do)
This ensures students:
- MUST use feature branches
- MUST create pull requests
- Can't accidentally break main
**For beginners:** Consider allowing students to merge their own PRs after approval to complete the full workflow.
### Step 6: Test the Setup
Before the workshop, test as a student would:
```bash
# Clone as a test student
git clone https://git.frod.dk/multiplayer/great-print-project.git
cd great-print-project
# Run the program
python main.py
# Should show only "A" with missing letters/numbers
# Create test branch
git switch -c test-branch
# Edit letters.py, add print_b()
def print_b():
print("B", end=" ")
# Commit and push
git add letters.py
git commit -m "Test commit"
git push -u origin test-branch
# Create test pull request
# (Do this via web UI)
# Clean up test branch after
git push origin --delete test-branch
```
---
## During the Workshop
### Pairing Students
**Strategies for assigning pairs:**
**Option 1: Random pairing**
- Use a random number generator
- Pair students as they arrive
**Option 2: Skill-based pairing**
- Mix experienced and beginner students
- Balance pair capabilities
**Option 3: Let them choose**
- Students pick their own partners
- Good for building team dynamics
**Announce pairs clearly:**
- Write on board/screen: "Pair 1: Alice & Bob"
- Provide printed assignment sheet
- Update `assignments.md` in repo if needed
### Timeline
**Suggested schedule for 2-hour session:**
- **0:00-0:10** (10 min): Introduction, distribute credentials
- **0:10-0:20** (10 min): Students clone repo, verify access
- **0:20-0:35** (15 min): Part 1 - Getting Started
- **0:35-0:55** (20 min): Part 2 - First Contribution
- **0:55-1:25** (30 min): Part 3 - Conflict Exercise (key learning!)
- **1:25-1:45** (20 min): Part 4 - Pull Requests
- **1:45-2:00** (15 min): Part 5 - Syncing, Q&A, wrap-up
### Monitoring Progress
**Use Gitea to track:**
1. **Branches created:** Repository → Branches
- Should see `pair-1-bcd`, `pair-2-efg`, etc.
2. **Commits:** Repository → Commits
- Each pair should have multiple commits
3. **Pull requests:** Repository → Pull Requests
- Should see one PR per pair
**Walk around the room:**
- Check screens for conflict markers
- Ask pairs how they're resolving conflicts
- Ensure both partners are engaged
**Common issues to watch for:**
- Partners not using the same branch name
- Forgetting to pull before pushing
- Not removing conflict markers completely
- Committing to main instead of feature branch
### Managing Pull Requests
**Your role:**
**Option A: Review and merge yourself**
- Teaches students what good reviews look like
- Ensures quality before merging
- More facilitator work
**Option B: Students merge their own**
- More autonomous learning
- Students experience complete workflow
- Risk of messy main branch
**Recommended approach:**
1. First 2-3 PRs: You review and merge (demonstrate good practices)
2. Remaining PRs: Students review each other, you approve
3. Students can merge after approval
**What to check in PR reviews:**
- Functions implemented correctly
- No conflict markers in code
- Code follows pattern (e.g., `print("X", end=" ")`)
- Meaningful commit messages
### Handling Problems
**Common issues and solutions:**
**Problem: "I can't push!"**
- Check they're authenticated (token or SSH key)
- Check they pulled latest changes first
- Check branch name matches their partner's
**Problem: "Merge conflict won't resolve!"**
- Walk through Part 3 step-by-step with them
- Show them the conflict markers
- Verify they removed ALL markers
- Run `python main.py` together to test
**Problem: "We both committed to main!"**
- Have them create proper feature branch
- Use `git cherry-pick` to move commits
- Reset main to origin/main
**Problem: "GitHub Desktop / GUI tool shows something different"**
- Recommend command line for this exercise
- GUIs can hide important details during conflicts
### Celebrating Success
When all pairs have merged:
```bash
git pull origin main
python main.py
```
**Everyone should see:**
```
==================================================
THE GREAT PRINT PROJECT
==================================================
Letters:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Numbers:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
==================================================
PROJECT COMPLETE!
==================================================
```
**Take a screenshot!** Share it with the class. This is a genuine collaborative achievement.
---
## Post-Workshop
### Cleanup (Optional)
**Keep the repository for future workshops:**
- Delete all feature branches: `git push origin --delete pair-1-bcd` (etc.)
- Reset main to initial state
- Reuse for next cohort
**Archive the session:**
- Export final repository state
- Take screenshots of successful PRs
- Save for portfolio/examples
### Student Takeaways
Provide students:
- Link to repository (they can clone for reference)
- Completion certificate (if applicable)
- Next steps: contributing to open source, Git resources
---
## Troubleshooting
### Gitea Server Issues
**Problem: Server unreachable**
- Check Cloudflare Tunnel is running: `cloudflared tunnel info`
- Verify Gitea container is up: `docker ps`
- Check firewall rules
**Problem: SSH not working**
- Verify SSH port is exposed in docker-compose.yml
- Check Cloudflare Tunnel config includes SSH
- Test: `ssh -T git@git.frod.dk`
**Problem: HTTPS clone fails**
- Check certificate validity
- Try `GIT_SSL_NO_VERIFY=true git clone ...` (temporary workaround)
- Configure Gitea to use proper HTTPS certificates
### Authentication Issues
**Problem: Students can't log in**
- Verify accounts created and active
- Reset passwords if needed
- Check email verification isn't blocking (disable for workshop)
**Problem: Push fails with authentication error**
- HTTPS: Ensure students use access token, not password
- SSH: Verify keys added to Gitea account
- Check repo permissions (must be Write, not Read)
### Git Workflow Issues
**Problem: Students create PR but can't merge**
- Check branch protection rules
- Verify they have Write access
- Ensure PR doesn't have conflicts
**Problem: Main branch gets messy**
- Reset to last good commit: `git reset --hard <commit>`
- Force push: `git push --force origin main` (CAREFUL!)
- Or start fresh: delete repo, recreate with starter code
---
## Tips for Success
### Before Workshop
- Test the entire flow yourself as a student
- Prepare credential sheets for each student
- Have backup plan if server goes down (local git exercise)
- Prepare slides explaining merge conflicts visually
### During Workshop
- **Start on time** - respect everyone's schedule
- **Pair programming** - ensure both partners engage
- **Encourage talking** - best conflicts are resolved by discussion
- **Celebrate small wins** - first push, first conflict resolution
- **Walk the room** - see screens, answer questions live
### After Workshop
- Gather feedback - what worked, what didn't
- Note timing - were parts too rushed or too slow?
- Archive successful PRs as examples
- Plan improvements for next session
---
## Scaling Considerations
### Small Groups (4-8 students, 2-4 pairs)
- More hands-on facilitator time
- Can review all PRs in detail
- Easier to monitor progress
### Medium Groups (10-20 students, 5-10 pairs)
- Recommended size
- Good mix of collaboration and individual attention
- Helps if you have a teaching assistant
### Large Groups (20+ students, 10+ pairs)
- Consider multiple repositories (split into groups of 12 pairs max)
- Recruit teaching assistants to help monitor
- Use breakout rooms (if online)
- Automate more (less PR review, more self-merging)
---
## Additional Resources
### For You (Facilitator)
- Gitea documentation: https://docs.gitea.io/
- Pro Git book (free): https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2
- Teaching Git: https://git-scm.com/doc
### For Students
- Git cheatsheet (included in workshop repo)
- Interactive Git tutorial: https://learngitbranching.js.org/
- Oh Shit Git: https://ohshitgit.com/ (recovering from mistakes)
---
## Questions or Issues?
This guide should cover most scenarios. If you encounter issues not listed here:
1. Check Gitea logs: `docker logs gitea-container-name`
2. Test with minimal setup (single test student)
3. Consult Gitea documentation
4. Reach out to workshop repository maintainers
**Good luck with your workshop! The multiplayer module is where Git skills really come alive.**

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 33 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 91 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 75 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 170 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 53 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 165 KiB

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

View File

@@ -1,130 +0,0 @@
# Module 07: Rebasing
## Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will:
- Understand what rebasing is and how it works
- Know the difference between merge and rebase
- Perform a rebase to integrate changes from one branch to another
- Understand when to use rebase vs merge
- Know the golden rule of rebasing
## Challenge Description
You have a repository with a `main` branch and a `feature` branch. While you were working on the feature branch, new commits were added to `main`. You want to incorporate those changes into your feature branch while maintaining a clean, linear history.
Your task is to:
1. Review the current commit history
2. Rebase the `feature` branch onto `main`
3. Verify that the history is now linear
## Key Concepts
### What is Rebasing?
Rebasing is the process of moving or combining a sequence of commits to a new base commit. Instead of creating a merge commit like `git merge` does, rebasing rewrites the commit history by replaying your commits on top of another branch.
### Rebase vs Merge
**Merge:**
```
A---B---C feature
/ \
D---E---F---G main
```
Creates a merge commit (G) that ties the histories together.
**Rebase:**
```
A'--B'--C' feature
/
D---E---F main
```
Replays commits A, B, C on top of F, creating new commits A', B', C' with the same changes but different commit hashes.
### Benefits of Rebasing
- **Cleaner history**: Linear history is easier to read and understand
- **Simpler log**: No merge commits cluttering the history
- **Easier bisecting**: Finding bugs with `git bisect` is simpler with linear history
### The Golden Rule of Rebasing
**Never rebase commits that have been pushed to a public/shared repository.**
Why? Because rebasing rewrites history by creating new commits. If others have based work on the original commits, rebasing will cause serious problems for collaborators.
**Safe to rebase:**
- Local commits not yet pushed
- Feature branches you're working on alone
- Cleaning up your work before creating a pull request
**Never rebase:**
- Commits already pushed to a shared branch (like `main` or `develop`)
- Commits that others might have based work on
## Useful Commands
```bash
# Rebase current branch onto another branch
git rebase <branch-name>
# View commit history as a graph
git log --oneline --graph --all
# If conflicts occur during rebase:
# 1. Resolve conflicts in files
# 2. Stage the resolved files
git add <file>
# 3. Continue the rebase
git rebase --continue
# Abort a rebase if something goes wrong
git rebase --abort
# Check which branch you're on
git branch
# Switch to a branch
git switch <branch-name>
```
## Verification
Run the verification script to check your solution:
```bash
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification will check that:
- You're on the feature branch
- The rebase was completed successfully
- The history is linear (no merge commits)
- All commits from both branches are present
## Tips
- Always check your commit graph with `git log --oneline --graph --all` before and after rebasing
- If you encounter conflicts during rebase, resolve them just like merge conflicts
- Use `git rebase --abort` if you want to cancel the rebase and start over
- Rebasing rewrites history, so the commit hashes will change
- Only rebase local commits that haven't been shared with others
## When to Use Rebase vs Merge
**Use Rebase when:**
- You want a clean, linear history
- Working on a local feature branch that hasn't been shared
- Updating your feature branch with the latest changes from main
- You want to clean up commits before submitting a pull request
**Use Merge when:**
- Working on a shared/public branch
- You want to preserve the complete history including when branches diverged
- You're merging a completed feature into main
- You want to be safe and avoid rewriting history
## What You'll Learn
Rebasing is a powerful tool for maintaining a clean project history. While merging is safer and preserves exact history, rebasing creates a more readable linear timeline. Understanding both techniques and knowing when to use each is essential for effective Git workflow management.

View File

@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the rebasing challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Removes the existing challenge directory and runs setup.ps1
to create a fresh challenge environment.
#>
Write-Host "Resetting challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
Write-Host "Removed existing challenge directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
}
# Run setup script
Write-Host "Running setup script...`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
& ".\setup.ps1"

View File

@@ -1,123 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the rebasing challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Creates a Git repository with diverged branches to practice rebasing.
The feature branch needs to be rebased onto main.
#>
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
}
# Create challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize git repository
git init | Out-Null
git config user.name "Workshop User" | Out-Null
git config user.email "user@workshop.local" | Out-Null
# Create initial file and commit
$readme = @"
# My Project
A sample project for learning Git rebasing.
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readme
git add README.md
git commit -m "Initial commit" | Out-Null
# Create and switch to feature branch
git checkout -b feature | Out-Null
# Add commits on feature branch
$feature1 = @"
# My Project
A sample project for learning Git rebasing.
## Features
- Feature A: User authentication
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $feature1
git add README.md
git commit -m "Add feature A" | Out-Null
$feature2 = @"
# My Project
A sample project for learning Git rebasing.
## Features
- Feature A: User authentication
- Feature B: Data validation
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $feature2
git add README.md
git commit -m "Add feature B" | Out-Null
# Switch back to main and add commits (simulating other work happening on main)
git checkout main | Out-Null
$main1 = @"
# My Project
A sample project for learning Git rebasing.
## Installation
Run \`npm install\` to install dependencies.
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $main1
git add README.md
git commit -m "Add installation instructions" | Out-Null
$main2 = @"
# My Project
A sample project for learning Git rebasing.
## Installation
Run \`npm install\` to install dependencies.
## Configuration
Copy \`config.example.json\` to \`config.json\` and update settings.
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $main2
git add README.md
git commit -m "Add configuration instructions" | Out-Null
# Switch back to feature branch
git checkout feature | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "Challenge environment created!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou are now on the 'feature' branch." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "The 'main' branch has new commits that aren't in your feature branch." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nYour task:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "1. Navigate to the challenge directory: cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "2. View the commit history: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "3. Rebase the 'feature' branch onto 'main'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. View the history again to see the linear result" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nRun '../verify.ps1' from the challenge directory to check your solution.`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan

View File

@@ -1,154 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the rebasing challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
Checks that the user successfully rebased the feature branch onto main,
resulting in a clean, linear history.
#>
Set-Location "challenge" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "../verify.ps1")) {
Write-Host "Error: Please run this script from the module directory" -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
if (-not (Test-Path ".")) {
Write-Host "Error: Challenge directory not found. Run setup.ps1 first." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
Write-Host "Verifying your solution..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check if git repository exists
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No git repository found." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check current branch
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -ne "feature") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] You should be on the 'feature' branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Current branch: $currentBranch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Hint: Use 'git checkout feature' to switch to feature branch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check if there's an ongoing rebase
if (Test-Path ".git/rebase-merge") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Rebase is not complete. There may be unresolved conflicts." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Resolve any conflicts, then use:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " git add <file>" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git rebase --continue" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "Or abort with: git rebase --abort" -ForegroundColor White
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Get all commits on feature branch
$featureCommits = git log --oneline feature 2>$null
if (-not $featureCommits) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No commits found on feature branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check commit count (should be 5: 1 initial + 2 main + 2 feature)
$commitCount = (git rev-list --count feature 2>$null)
if ($commitCount -ne 5) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Expected 5 commits on feature branch, found $commitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: The rebased feature branch should contain:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " - 1 initial commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - 2 commits from main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - 2 commits from feature" -ForegroundColor White
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Get commit messages in reverse chronological order (newest first)
$commits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" feature 2>$null
# Convert to array and reverse to get chronological order (oldest first)
$commitArray = $commits -split "`n"
[array]::Reverse($commitArray)
# Check that commits are in the expected order after rebase
$expectedOrder = @(
"Initial commit",
"Add installation instructions",
"Add configuration instructions",
"Add feature A",
"Add feature B"
)
$orderCorrect = $true
for ($i = 0; $i -lt $expectedOrder.Length; $i++) {
if ($commitArray[$i] -ne $expectedOrder[$i]) {
$orderCorrect = $false
break
}
}
if (-not $orderCorrect) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Commit order is incorrect after rebase." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Expected order (oldest to newest):" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$expectedOrder | ForEach-Object { Write-Host " $_" -ForegroundColor White }
Write-Host "`nActual order:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$commitArray | ForEach-Object { Write-Host " $_" -ForegroundColor White }
Write-Host "`nHint: The feature commits should come AFTER the main commits" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that main branch still has only 3 commits (initial + 2 main commits)
$mainCommitCount = (git rev-list --count main 2>$null)
if ($mainCommitCount -ne 3) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Main branch should have 3 commits, found $mainCommitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: You should rebase feature onto main, not the other way around" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that there are no merge commits (parent count should be 1 for all commits)
$mergeCommits = git log --merges --oneline feature 2>$null
if ($mergeCommits) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Found merge commits in history. Rebasing should create a linear history." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Use 'git rebase main' instead of 'git merge main'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Verify that feature branch contains all commits from main
$mainCommits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" main 2>$null
$featureCommitMessages = git log --pretty=format:"%s" feature 2>$null
foreach ($mainCommit in ($mainCommits -split "`n")) {
if ($featureCommitMessages -notcontains $mainCommit) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Feature branch is missing commits from main." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Missing: $mainCommit" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
}
# Success!
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "SUCCESS! Challenge completed!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou have successfully:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "- Rebased the feature branch onto main" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Created a clean, linear commit history" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Preserved all commits from both branches" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nYour feature branch now has a linear history!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "Run 'git log --oneline --graph --all' to see the result.`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Set-Location ..
exit 0

View File

@@ -1,159 +0,0 @@
# Module 08: Interactive Rebase
## Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will:
- Understand what interactive rebase is and when to use it
- Learn the different interactive rebase commands (pick, reword, squash, fixup, drop)
- Clean up commit history by squashing related commits
- Reword commit messages to be more descriptive
- Use reset and commit techniques to achieve similar results
## Challenge Description
You have a feature branch with messy commit history - multiple "WIP" commits, typos in commit messages, and commits that should be combined. Before submitting a pull request, you want to clean up this history.
Your task is to:
1. Review the current commit history with its messy commits
2. Combine the four feature commits into a single, well-described commit
3. Keep the initial commit unchanged
4. End up with a clean, professional commit history
## Key Concepts
### What is Interactive Rebase?
Interactive rebase (`git rebase -i`) is a powerful tool that lets you modify commit history. Unlike regular rebase which simply moves commits, interactive rebase lets you:
- Reorder commits
- Edit commit messages (reword)
- Combine multiple commits (squash/fixup)
- Split commits into smaller ones
- Delete commits entirely
- Edit the contents of commits
### Interactive Rebase Commands
When you run `git rebase -i HEAD~3`, Git opens an editor with a list of commits and commands:
```
pick abc1234 First commit
pick def5678 Second commit
pick ghi9012 Third commit
```
You can change `pick` to other commands:
- **pick**: Keep the commit as-is
- **reword**: Keep the commit but edit its message
- **edit**: Pause the rebase to amend the commit
- **squash**: Combine this commit with the previous one, keeping both messages
- **fixup**: Like squash, but discard this commit's message
- **drop**: Remove the commit entirely
### When to Use Interactive Rebase
Interactive rebase is perfect for:
- Cleaning up work-in-progress commits before creating a pull request
- Fixing typos in commit messages
- Combining related commits into logical units
- Removing debug commits or experimental code
- Creating a clean, professional history
**Remember**: Only rebase commits that haven't been pushed to a shared branch!
## Alternative Approach: Reset and Recommit
Since interactive rebase requires an interactive editor, this challenge uses an alternative approach that achieves the same result:
1. **Reset soft**: Move HEAD back while keeping changes staged
```bash
git reset --soft HEAD~4
```
This keeps all changes from the last 4 commits but "uncommits" them.
2. **Create a new commit**: Commit all changes with a clean message
```bash
git commit -m "Your new clean commit message"
```
This technique is useful when you want to combine multiple commits into one without using interactive rebase.
## Useful Commands
```bash
# View commit history
git log --oneline
# See the last N commits in detail
git log -n 5
# Reset to N commits back, keeping changes staged
git reset --soft HEAD~N
# Reset to N commits back, keeping changes unstaged
git reset --mixed HEAD~N
# Reset to N commits back, discarding all changes (DANGEROUS!)
git reset --hard HEAD~N
# Create a new commit
git commit -m "message"
# Amend the last commit
git commit --amend -m "new message"
# Interactive rebase (requires interactive editor)
git rebase -i HEAD~N
# Check current status
git status
```
## Verification
Run the verification script to check your solution:
```bash
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification will check that:
- You have exactly 2 commits total (initial + your combined feature commit)
- The feature commit contains all the changes from the original 4 feature commits
- The commit message is clean and descriptive
- All expected files are present
## Challenge Steps
1. Navigate to the challenge directory
2. View the current messy commit history: `git log --oneline`
3. Use `git reset --soft HEAD~4` to uncommit the last 4 commits while keeping changes
4. Check status with `git status` - you should see all changes staged
5. Create a new commit with a clean message: `git commit -m "Add user profile feature with validation"`
6. Verify with `git log --oneline` - you should now have clean history
7. Run the verification script
## Tips
- Always check your history with `git log --oneline` before and after
- `git reset --soft` is safer than `--hard` because it keeps your changes
- You can use `git reset --soft HEAD~N` where N is the number of commits to undo
- If you make a mistake, run `.\reset.ps1` to start over
- In real projects with interactive rebase, you would use `git rebase -i HEAD~N` and modify the commit list in the editor
## What is Git Reset?
`git reset` moves the current branch pointer to a different commit:
- **--soft**: Moves HEAD but keeps changes staged
- **--mixed** (default): Moves HEAD and unstages changes, but keeps them in working directory
- **--hard**: Moves HEAD and discards all changes (dangerous!)
Reset is useful for:
- Undoing commits while keeping changes (`--soft`)
- Unstaging files (`--mixed`)
- Discarding commits entirely (`--hard`)
## What You'll Learn
Cleaning up commit history is an important skill for professional development. Whether you use interactive rebase or reset-and-recommit, the goal is the same: create a clear, logical history that makes your code review easier and your project history more understandable. Messy WIP commits are fine during development, but cleaning them up before merging shows attention to detail and makes your codebase more maintainable.

View File

@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the interactive rebase challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Removes the existing challenge directory and runs setup.ps1
to create a fresh challenge environment.
#>
Write-Host "Resetting challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
Write-Host "Removed existing challenge directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
}
# Run setup script
Write-Host "Running setup script...`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
& ".\setup.ps1"

View File

@@ -1,133 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the interactive rebase challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Creates a Git repository with messy commit history that needs to be
cleaned up using reset and recommit techniques.
#>
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
}
# Create challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize git repository
git init | Out-Null
git config user.name "Workshop User" | Out-Null
git config user.email "user@workshop.local" | Out-Null
# Create initial commit
$readme = @"
# User Management System
A simple user management application.
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readme
git add README.md
git commit -m "Initial commit" | Out-Null
# Create messy commits that should be squashed
# Commit 1: WIP user profile
$userProfile = @"
class UserProfile:
def __init__(self, name, email):
self.name = name
self.email = email
"@
Set-Content -Path "user_profile.py" -Value $userProfile
git add user_profile.py
git commit -m "WIP: user profile" | Out-Null
# Commit 2: Add validation (typo in message)
$userProfileWithValidation = @"
class UserProfile:
def __init__(self, name, email):
self.name = name
self.email = email
def validate(self):
if not self.name or not self.email:
raise ValueError('Name and email are required')
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "user_profile.py" -Value $userProfileWithValidation
git add user_profile.py
git commit -m "add validaton" | Out-Null # Intentional typo
# Commit 3: Fix validation
$userProfileFixed = @"
class UserProfile:
def __init__(self, name, email):
self.name = name
self.email = email
def validate(self):
if not self.name or not self.email:
raise ValueError('Name and email are required')
if '@' not in self.email:
raise ValueError('Invalid email format')
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "user_profile.py" -Value $userProfileFixed
git add user_profile.py
git commit -m "fix validation bug" | Out-Null
# Commit 4: Add tests (another WIP commit)
$tests = @"
import unittest
from user_profile import UserProfile
class TestUserProfile(unittest.TestCase):
def test_validate_correct_user_data(self):
user = UserProfile('John', 'john@example.com')
self.assertTrue(user.validate())
def test_reject_missing_name(self):
user = UserProfile('', 'john@example.com')
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
user.validate()
def test_reject_invalid_email(self):
user = UserProfile('John', 'invalid-email')
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
user.validate()
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
"@
Set-Content -Path "test_user_profile.py" -Value $tests
git add test_user_profile.py
git commit -m "WIP tests" | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "Challenge environment created!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou have a repository with messy commit history:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "- WIP commits" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "- Typos in commit messages" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "- Multiple commits that should be combined" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nYour task:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "1. Navigate to the challenge directory: cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "2. View the messy history: git log --oneline" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "3. Use 'git reset --soft HEAD~4' to uncommit the last 4 commits" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. Create a single clean commit with a descriptive message" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " Example: git commit -m 'Add user profile feature with validation'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nRun '../verify.ps1' from the challenge directory to check your solution.`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan

View File

@@ -1,172 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the interactive rebase challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
Checks that the user successfully cleaned up the commit history
by combining multiple messy commits into a single clean commit.
#>
Set-Location "challenge" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "../verify.ps1")) {
Write-Host "Error: Please run this script from the module directory" -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
if (-not (Test-Path ".")) {
Write-Host "Error: Challenge directory not found. Run setup.ps1 first." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
Write-Host "Verifying your solution..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check if git repository exists
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No git repository found." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check commit count (should be exactly 2: initial + combined feature commit)
$commitCount = (git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null)
if ($commitCount -ne 2) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Expected exactly 2 commits, found $commitCount" -ForegroundColor Red
if ($commitCount -gt 2) {
Write-Host "Hint: You have too many commits. Use 'git reset --soft HEAD~N' to combine them." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " Where N is the number of commits to undo (should be 4 in this case)." -ForegroundColor Yellow
} else {
Write-Host "Hint: You may have reset too far back. Run ../reset.ps1 to start over." -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Get commit messages
$commits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" 2>$null
$commitArray = $commits -split "`n"
# Check that first commit is still the initial commit
if ($commitArray[1] -ne "Initial commit") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] The initial commit should remain unchanged." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Expected first commit: 'Initial commit'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Found: '$($commitArray[1])'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that the second commit message is clean (not WIP, not with typos)
$featureCommit = $commitArray[0]
if ($featureCommit -match "WIP|wip") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Commit message still contains 'WIP'." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Current message: '$featureCommit'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Hint: Create a clean, descriptive commit message." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
if ($featureCommit -match "validaton") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Commit message contains a typo ('validaton')." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Current message: '$featureCommit'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Hint: Use a properly spelled commit message." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that commit message is not empty and has reasonable length
if ($featureCommit.Length -lt 10) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Commit message is too short. Be more descriptive." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Current message: '$featureCommit'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that required files exist
if (-not (Test-Path "user_profile.py")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] user_profile.py not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
if (-not (Test-Path "test_user_profile.py")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] test_user_profile.py not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that user_profile.py contains all expected features
$userProfileContent = Get-Content "user_profile.py" -Raw
# Should have the class
if ($userProfileContent -notmatch "class UserProfile") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] user_profile.py should contain UserProfile class." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Should have validation method
if ($userProfileContent -notmatch "def validate\(") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] user_profile.py should contain validate() method." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Should have email format validation (the final fix from commit 3)
if ($userProfileContent -notmatch "'@'.*in.*email|email.*in.*'@'") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] user_profile.py should contain email format validation." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Make sure all changes from all 4 commits are included." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that test file has content
$testContent = Get-Content "test_user_profile.py" -Raw
if ($testContent -notmatch "class.*TestUserProfile") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] test_user_profile.py should contain TestUserProfile tests." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check that we have at least 3 test cases
$testMatches = ([regex]::Matches($testContent, "def test_")).Count
if ($testMatches -lt 3) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] test_user_profile.py should contain at least 3 test cases." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Verify that the latest commit contains changes to both files
$filesInLastCommit = git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD 2>$null
if ($filesInLastCommit -notcontains "user_profile.py") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] The feature commit should include user_profile.py" -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
if ($filesInLastCommit -notcontains "test_user_profile.py") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] The feature commit should include test_user_profile.py" -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Success!
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "SUCCESS! Challenge completed!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou have successfully:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "- Combined 4 messy commits into 1 clean commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Created a descriptive commit message" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Preserved all code changes" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Cleaned up the commit history" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nYour commit history is now clean and professional!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "Run 'git log --oneline' to see the result.`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Key takeaway: Clean commit history makes code review easier" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "and your project more maintainable.`n" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 0

View File

@@ -1,208 +0,0 @@
# Module 13: Worktrees
## Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will:
- Understand what Git worktrees are and when to use them
- Create and manage multiple working directories for the same repository
- Work on multiple branches simultaneously
- Understand the benefits of worktrees over stashing or cloning
- Remove and clean up worktrees
## Challenge Description
You're working on a feature when an urgent bug report comes in. Instead of stashing your work or creating a separate clone, you'll use Git worktrees to work on both the feature and the bugfix simultaneously in different directories.
Your task is to:
1. Create a worktree for the bugfix on a separate branch
2. Fix the bug in the worktree
3. Commit and verify the fix
4. Continue working on your feature in the main working directory
5. Clean up the worktree when done
## Key Concepts
### What are Git Worktrees?
A worktree is an additional working directory attached to the same repository. Each worktree can have a different branch checked out, allowing you to work on multiple branches simultaneously without switching.
### Traditional Workflow vs Worktrees
**Traditional (switching branches):**
```
main-repo/
- Switch to bugfix branch
- Fix bug
- Switch back to feature branch
- Continue feature work
- (Requires stashing or committing incomplete work)
```
**With Worktrees:**
```
main-repo/ <- feature branch
worktrees/bugfix/ <- bugfix branch
Work in both simultaneously!
```
### Why Use Worktrees?
**Advantages:**
- Work on multiple branches at the same time
- No need to stash or commit incomplete work
- Each worktree has its own working directory and index
- Share the same Git history (one `.git` directory)
- Faster than cloning the entire repository
- Perfect for code reviews, comparisons, or parallel development
**Use Cases:**
- Urgent bug fixes while working on a feature
- Code reviews (checkout PR in separate worktree)
- Comparing implementations side by side
- Running tests on one branch while coding on another
- Building different versions simultaneously
## Useful Commands
```bash
# List all worktrees
git worktree list
# Add a new worktree
git worktree add <path> <branch>
git worktree add ../bugfix bugfix-branch
# Create new branch in worktree
git worktree add <path> -b <new-branch>
git worktree add ../feature-new -b feature-new
# Remove a worktree
git worktree remove <path>
git worktree remove ../bugfix
# Prune stale worktree information
git worktree prune
# Move a worktree
git worktree move <old-path> <new-path>
# Lock a worktree (prevent deletion)
git worktree lock <path>
git worktree unlock <path>
```
## Verification
Run the verification script to check your solution:
```bash
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification will check that:
- You created a worktree for the bugfix
- The bug was fixed and committed in the worktree
- Your feature work continued in the main directory
- Both branches have the expected changes
## Challenge Steps
1. Navigate to the challenge directory
2. You're in main-repo with a feature branch checked out
3. View current worktrees: `git worktree list`
4. Create a worktree for bugfix: `git worktree add ../bugfix-worktree -b bugfix`
5. Navigate to the worktree: `cd ../bugfix-worktree`
6. Fix the bug in calculator.js (fix the divide by zero check)
7. Commit the fix: `git add . && git commit -m "Fix divide by zero bug"`
8. Go back to main repo: `cd ../main-repo`
9. Continue working on your feature
10. Add a new method to calculator.js
11. Commit your feature
12. List worktrees: `git worktree list`
13. Remove the worktree: `git worktree remove ../bugfix-worktree`
14. Run verification
## Tips
- Worktree paths are typically siblings of your main repo (use `../worktree-name`)
- Each worktree must have a different branch checked out
- Can't checkout the same branch in multiple worktrees
- The main `.git` directory is shared, so commits in any worktree are visible everywhere
- Worktrees are listed in `.git/worktrees/`
- Use `git worktree remove` to clean up, or just delete the directory and run `git worktree prune`
- Worktrees persist across restarts until explicitly removed
## Common Worktree Workflows
### Urgent Bugfix
```bash
# Currently on feature branch with uncommitted changes
git worktree add ../hotfix -b hotfix
cd ../hotfix
# Fix the bug
git add .
git commit -m "Fix critical bug"
git push origin hotfix
cd ../main-repo
# Continue working on feature
```
### Code Review
```bash
# Review a pull request without switching branches
git fetch origin pull/123/head:pr-123
git worktree add ../review-pr-123 pr-123
cd ../review-pr-123
# Review code, test it
# Run: npm test, npm start, etc.
cd ../main-repo
git worktree remove ../review-pr-123
```
### Parallel Development
```bash
# Work on two features simultaneously
git worktree add ../feature-a -b feature-a
git worktree add ../feature-b -b feature-b
# Terminal 1
cd feature-a && code .
# Terminal 2
cd feature-b && code .
```
### Build Comparison
```bash
# Compare builds between branches
git worktree add ../release-build release-v2.0
cd ../release-build
npm run build
# Test production build
# Meanwhile, continue development in main repo
```
## Worktree vs Other Approaches
### vs Stashing
- **Stash**: Temporary, one at a time, requires branch switching
- **Worktree**: Persistent, multiple simultaneously, no switching
### vs Cloning
- **Clone**: Full copy, separate `.git`, uses more disk space
- **Worktree**: Shared `.git`, less disk space, instant sync
### vs Branch Switching
- **Switching**: Requires clean working directory, one branch at a time
- **Worktree**: Keep dirty working directory, multiple branches active
## What You'll Learn
Git worktrees are a powerful but underutilized feature that can significantly improve your workflow. They eliminate the need for constant branch switching, stashing, or maintaining multiple clones. Whether you're handling urgent fixes, reviewing code, or comparing implementations, worktrees provide a clean and efficient solution. Once you understand worktrees, you'll find many situations where they're the perfect tool for the job.

View File

@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the worktrees challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Removes the existing challenge directory and runs setup.ps1
to create a fresh challenge environment.
#>
Write-Host "Resetting challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
Write-Host "Removed existing challenge directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
}
# Run setup script
Write-Host "Running setup script...`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
& ".\setup.ps1"

View File

@@ -1,123 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the worktrees challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Creates a Git repository with a feature in progress, ready for
demonstrating the use of worktrees for parallel work.
#>
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
}
# Create challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Create main repository
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "main-repo" | Out-Null
Set-Location "main-repo"
# Initialize git repository
git init | Out-Null
git config user.name "Workshop User" | Out-Null
git config user.email "user@workshop.local" | Out-Null
# Create initial calculator with a bug
$calculator = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
# BUG: No division by zero check!
def divide(self, a, b):
return a / b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calculator
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Initial calculator implementation" | Out-Null
$readme = @"
# Calculator Project
A simple calculator with basic operations.
## Features
- Addition
- Subtraction
- Multiplication
- Division (has a bug!)
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readme
git add README.md
git commit -m "Add README" | Out-Null
# Create feature branch and start working on it
git checkout -b feature-advanced-math | Out-Null
# Add work in progress on feature branch
$calculatorWithFeature = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
# BUG: No division by zero check!
def divide(self, a, b):
return a / b
# New feature: power function (work in progress)
def power(self, a, b):
return a ** b
# TODO: Add square root function
# TODO: Add logarithm function
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calculatorWithFeature
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add power function (WIP: more math functions coming)" | Out-Null
# Return to challenge directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "Challenge environment created!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nSituation:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "You're working on the 'feature-advanced-math' branch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "You have plans to add more math functions (see TODOs)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nUrgent: A critical bug was discovered in the divide function!" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "It doesn't check for division by zero." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "`nInstead of stashing your feature work, use a worktree:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nYour task:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "1. Navigate to main-repo: cd challenge/main-repo" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "2. Create a worktree: git worktree add ../bugfix-worktree -b bugfix" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "3. Go to worktree: cd ../bugfix-worktree" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. Fix the bug in calculator.py:" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " Add a check: if (b === 0) throw new Error('Division by zero');" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "5. Commit the fix: git add . && git commit -m 'Fix divide by zero bug'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "6. Return to main-repo: cd ../main-repo" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "7. Complete your feature: Add square root method to calculator.py" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "8. Commit: git add . && git commit -m 'Add square root function'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "9. Clean up worktree: git worktree remove ../bugfix-worktree" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nRun '../verify.ps1' from the challenge directory to check your solution.`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan

View File

@@ -1,165 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the worktrees challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
Checks that the user successfully used worktrees to fix a bug
while continuing work on a feature.
#>
Set-Location "challenge" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "../verify.ps1")) {
Write-Host "Error: Please run this script from the module directory" -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
if (-not (Test-Path ".")) {
Write-Host "Error: Challenge directory not found. Run setup.ps1 first." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
Write-Host "Verifying your solution..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check if main-repo exists
if (-not (Test-Path "main-repo")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] main-repo directory not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
Set-Location "main-repo"
# Check if it's a git repository
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] main-repo is not a git repository." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
# Check if bugfix branch exists
$branches = git branch --all 2>$null
if ($branches -notmatch "bugfix") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] bugfix branch not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Create a worktree with: git worktree add ../bugfix-worktree -b bugfix" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
Write-Host "[PASS] Bugfix branch exists!" -ForegroundColor Green
# Check bugfix branch for the fix
git checkout bugfix 2>$null | Out-Null
if (-not (Test-Path "calculator.py")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] calculator.py not found on bugfix branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
$bugfixCalc = Get-Content "calculator.py" -Raw
# Check if division by zero check was added
if ($bugfixCalc -notmatch "b === 0|b == 0|division by zero|divide by zero") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Division by zero check not found in bugfix branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Add a check in the divide method to prevent division by zero" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
# Check for commit on bugfix branch
$bugfixCommits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" bugfix 2>$null
if ($bugfixCommits -notmatch "bug|fix|division|divide") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No bugfix commit found on bugfix branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Commit your fix with a descriptive message" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
Write-Host "[PASS] Bug fixed on bugfix branch!" -ForegroundColor Green
# Check feature branch for continued work
git checkout feature-advanced-math 2>$null | Out-Null
$featureCalc = Get-Content "calculator.py" -Raw
# Check if square root function was added
if ($featureCalc -notmatch "sqrt|squareRoot") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Square root function not found on feature branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: Add the square root method to calculator.py on feature-advanced-math branch" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
# Check that feature work was committed
$featureCommits = git log --pretty=format:"%s" feature-advanced-math 2>$null
$featureCommitArray = $featureCommits -split "`n"
# Should have at least 3 commits: initial + README + power + sqrt
if ($featureCommitArray.Count -lt 4) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Not enough commits on feature branch." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Expected: initial, README, power, and square root commits" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Found $($featureCommitArray.Count) commits" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
# Check if the latest feature commit is about square root
if ($featureCommitArray[0] -notmatch "sqrt|square|root") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Latest commit on feature branch should be about square root." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Latest commit: $($featureCommitArray[0])" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
Write-Host "[PASS] Feature work completed!" -ForegroundColor Green
# Check if worktree was cleaned up (bugfix-worktree should not exist or be removed)
Set-Location ..
$worktreeStillExists = Test-Path "bugfix-worktree"
if ($worktreeStillExists) {
Write-Host "[WARNING] bugfix-worktree directory still exists." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Hint: Clean up with: git worktree remove ../bugfix-worktree" -ForegroundColor Yellow
# Don't fail on this, just warn
}
# Check worktree list
Set-Location "main-repo"
$worktrees = git worktree list 2>$null
# Verify that the concept was understood (they should have created the worktree at some point)
# We can check this by looking for the bugfix branch existence
if ($branches -notmatch "bugfix") {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No evidence of worktree usage." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ../..
exit 1
}
# Success!
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "SUCCESS! Challenge completed!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou have successfully:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "- Created a worktree for the bugfix" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Fixed the division by zero bug" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Committed the fix on the bugfix branch" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Continued feature work in parallel" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Added the square root function" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Committed the feature work" -ForegroundColor White
if (-not $worktreeStillExists) {
Write-Host "- Cleaned up the worktree" -ForegroundColor White
}
Write-Host "`nYou now understand Git worktrees!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nKey takeaway:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Worktrees let you work on multiple branches simultaneously" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "without stashing, switching, or cloning the repository.`n" -ForegroundColor White
Set-Location ../..
exit 0

View File

@@ -1,237 +0,0 @@
# Module 14: Bisect - Finding Bugs with Binary Search
## Learning Objectives
By the end of this module, you will:
- Understand what git bisect is and when to use it
- Use binary search to find the commit that introduced a bug
- Mark commits as good or bad during bisection
- Automate bisect with test scripts
- Understand the efficiency of binary search for debugging
## Challenge Description
A bug has appeared in your calculator application, but you don't know which commit introduced it. The project has many commits, and manually checking each one would take too long. You'll use `git bisect` to efficiently find the culprit commit using binary search.
Your task is to:
1. Start a bisect session
2. Mark the current commit as bad (bug exists)
3. Mark an old commit as good (bug didn't exist)
4. Test commits and mark them good or bad
5. Let Git find the first bad commit
6. Identify what change introduced the bug
## Key Concepts
### What is Git Bisect?
Git bisect uses binary search to find the commit that introduced a bug. Instead of checking every commit linearly, it cuts the search space in half with each test, making it extremely efficient.
### Binary Search Efficiency
**Linear Search (manual checking):**
- 100 commits = up to 100 tests
- 1000 commits = up to 1000 tests
**Binary Search (bisect):**
- 100 commits = ~7 tests
- 1000 commits = ~10 tests
Formula: log₂(n) tests needed for n commits
### How Bisect Works
```
Commits: A---B---C---D---E---F---G---H
✓ ✓ ✓ ? ? ? ? ✗
1. Start: Mark H (bad) and A (good)
2. Git checks middle: E
3. You test E: bad ✗
Commits: A---B---C---D---E
✓ ✓ ✓ ? ✗
4. Git checks middle: C
5. You test C: good ✓
Commits: C---D---E
✓ ? ✗
6. Git checks: D
7. You test D: bad ✗
Result: D is the first bad commit!
```
### When to Use Bisect
Use bisect when:
- You know a bug exists now but didn't exist in the past
- You have many commits to check
- You can reliably test for the bug
- You want to find exactly when something broke
## Useful Commands
```powershell
# Start bisect session
git bisect start
# Mark current commit as bad
git bisect bad
# Mark a commit as good
git bisect good <commit-hash>
git bisect good HEAD~10
# After testing current commit
git bisect good # This commit is fine
git bisect bad # This commit has the bug
# Skip a commit (if you can't test it)
git bisect skip
# End bisect session and return to original state
git bisect reset
# Visualize bisect process
git bisect visualize
git bisect view
# Automate with a test script
git bisect run <test-script>
git bisect run npm test
git bisect run ./test.sh
# Show bisect log
git bisect log
```
## Verification
Run the verification script to check your solution:
```powershell
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification will check that:
- You completed a bisect session
- You identified the correct commit that introduced the bug
- You understand which change caused the problem
## Challenge Steps
1. Navigate to the challenge directory
2. View the bug: run the calculator and see it fails
3. Start bisect: `git bisect start`
4. Mark current as bad: `git bisect bad`
5. Mark old commit as good: `git bisect good HEAD~10`
6. Git will checkout a middle commit
7. Test the current commit (run the test or check manually)
8. Mark it: `git bisect good` or `git bisect bad`
9. Repeat testing until Git identifies the bad commit
10. Note the commit hash and message
11. End bisect: `git bisect reset`
12. Check the identified commit: `git show <bad-commit-hash>`
13. Create a file named `bug-commit.txt` with the bad commit hash
14. Run verification
## Tips
- Always start with a known good commit (far enough back)
- Keep a clear way to test each commit (script or manual steps)
- Use `git bisect log` to see your progress
- `git bisect reset` returns you to your original state
- You can bisect on any criteria, not just bugs (performance, features, etc.)
- Automate with `git bisect run` for faster results
- Each bisect step cuts remaining commits in half
- Skip commits you can't build/test with `git bisect skip`
## Manual vs Automated Bisect
### Manual Bisect
```powershell
git bisect start
git bisect bad
git bisect good HEAD~20
# For each commit Git checks out:
npm test
git bisect good # or bad
git bisect reset
```
### Automated Bisect
```powershell
git bisect start
git bisect bad
git bisect good HEAD~20
git bisect run npm test
# Git automatically tests each commit
git bisect reset
```
The test script should exit with:
- 0 for good (test passes)
- 1-127 (except 125) for bad (test fails)
- 125 for skip (can't test this commit)
## Bisect Workflow Example
### Finding a Performance Regression
```powershell
# App is slow now, was fast 50 commits ago
git bisect start
git bisect bad
git bisect good HEAD~50
# Create test script
@'
$output = npm start 2>&1 | Select-String "Started in"
if ($output -match "Started in (\d+)") {
if ([int]$Matches[1] -gt 5000) { exit 1 } # Slow
else { exit 0 } # Fast
}
exit 1
'@ | Out-File -FilePath test.ps1
git bisect run pwsh test.ps1
# Git finds the commit that made it slow
```
### Finding When a Feature Broke
```powershell
git bisect start
git bisect bad
git bisect good v1.0.0 # Last known good version
# For each commit
npm test -- user-login.test.js
git bisect good # or bad
# Found! Commit abc123 broke login
git show abc123
```
## Common Bisect Pitfalls
### Pitfall 1: Testing Incorrectly
- Make sure your test is consistent
- Automate when possible to avoid human error
- Use the same test for every commit
### Pitfall 2: Wrong Good Commit
- If the "good" commit actually has the bug, bisect will fail
- Choose a commit you're confident was working
### Pitfall 3: Multiple Bugs
- Bisect finds one commit at a time
- If multiple bugs exist, they might confuse the search
- Fix found bugs and bisect again for others
## What You'll Learn
Git bisect is a powerful debugging tool that turns a tedious manual search into an efficient automated process. By leveraging binary search, you can quickly pinpoint problematic commits even in repositories with thousands of commits. This is invaluable for debugging regressions, performance issues, or any situation where something that worked before is now broken. Mastering bisect makes you a more effective debugger and shows deep Git proficiency.

View File

@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the bisect challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Removes the existing challenge directory and runs setup.ps1
to create a fresh challenge environment.
#>
Write-Host "Resetting challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
Write-Host "Removed existing challenge directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
}
# Run setup script
Write-Host "Running setup script...`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan
& ".\setup.ps1"

View File

@@ -1,311 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the bisect challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
Creates a Git repository with multiple commits where a bug is
introduced in one of them. Students use bisect to find it.
#>
# Remove existing challenge directory if present
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Path "challenge" -Recurse -Force
}
# Create challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge environment..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize git repository
git init | Out-Null
git config user.name "Workshop User" | Out-Null
git config user.email "user@workshop.local" | Out-Null
# Commit 1: Initial calculator
$calc1 = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc1
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Initial calculator with add function" | Out-Null
# Commit 2: Add subtract
$calc2 = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc2
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add subtract function" | Out-Null
# Commit 3: Add multiply
$calc3 = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc3
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add multiply function" | Out-Null
# Commit 4: Add divide
$calc4 = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
def divide(self, a, b):
if b == 0:
raise ValueError('Division by zero')
return a / b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc4
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add divide function" | Out-Null
# Commit 5: Add modulo
$calc5 = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
def divide(self, a, b):
if b == 0:
raise ValueError('Division by zero')
return a / b
def modulo(self, a, b):
return a % b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc5
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add modulo function" | Out-Null
# Commit 6: BUG - Introduce error in add function
$calc6 = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a - b # BUG: Should be a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
def divide(self, a, b):
if b == 0:
raise ValueError('Division by zero')
return a / b
def modulo(self, a, b):
return a % b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc6
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Refactor add function for clarity" | Out-Null
# Commit 7: Add power function (bug still exists)
$calc7 = @"
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a - b # BUG: Should be a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
def divide(self, a, b):
if b == 0:
raise ValueError('Division by zero')
return a / b
def modulo(self, a, b):
return a % b
def power(self, a, b):
return a ** b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc7
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add power function" | Out-Null
# Commit 8: Add square root
$calc8 = @"
import math
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a - b # BUG: Should be a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
def divide(self, a, b):
if b == 0:
raise ValueError('Division by zero')
return a / b
def modulo(self, a, b):
return a % b
def power(self, a, b):
return a ** b
def sqrt(self, a):
return math.sqrt(a)
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc8
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add square root function" | Out-Null
# Commit 9: Add absolute value
$calc9 = @"
import math
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a - b # BUG: Should be a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
def divide(self, a, b):
if b == 0:
raise ValueError('Division by zero')
return a / b
def modulo(self, a, b):
return a % b
def power(self, a, b):
return a ** b
def sqrt(self, a):
return math.sqrt(a)
def abs(self, a):
return abs(a)
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc9
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add absolute value function" | Out-Null
# Commit 10: Add max function
$calc10 = @"
import math
class Calculator:
def add(self, a, b):
return a - b # BUG: Should be a + b
def subtract(self, a, b):
return a - b
def multiply(self, a, b):
return a * b
def divide(self, a, b):
if b == 0:
raise ValueError('Division by zero')
return a / b
def modulo(self, a, b):
return a % b
def power(self, a, b):
return a ** b
def sqrt(self, a):
return math.sqrt(a)
def abs(self, a):
return abs(a)
def max(self, a, b):
return a if a > b else b
"@
Set-Content -Path "calculator.py" -Value $calc10
git add calculator.py
git commit -m "Add max function" | Out-Null
# Create a test file
$test = @"
import sys
from calculator import Calculator
calc = Calculator()
# Test addition (this will fail due to bug)
result = calc.add(5, 3)
if result != 8:
print(f'FAIL: add(5, 3) returned {result}, expected 8')
sys.exit(1)
print('PASS: All tests passed')
sys.exit(0)
"@
Set-Content -Path "test.py" -Value $test
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "Challenge environment created!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nSituation:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "The calculator has a bug - addition doesn't work correctly!" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "calc.add(5, 3) returns 2 instead of 8" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "`nThe bug was introduced somewhere in the last 10 commits." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Manually checking each commit would be tedious." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Use git bisect to find it efficiently!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYour task:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "1. Navigate to the challenge directory: cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "2. Test the bug: python test.py (it will fail)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "3. Start bisect: git bisect start" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "4. Mark current as bad: git bisect bad" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "5. Mark old commit as good: git bisect good HEAD~10" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "6. Git will checkout a commit - test it: python test.py" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "7. Mark result: git bisect good (if test passes) or git bisect bad (if it fails)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "8. Repeat until Git finds the first bad commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "9. Note the commit hash" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "10. End bisect: git bisect reset" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "11. Create bug-commit.txt with the bad commit hash" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nHint: The bug is in commit 6 ('Refactor add function for clarity')" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Run '../verify.ps1' from the challenge directory to check your solution.`n" -ForegroundColor Cyan

View File

@@ -1,133 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the bisect challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
Checks that the user successfully used git bisect to find
the commit that introduced the bug.
#>
Set-Location "challenge" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "../verify.ps1")) {
Write-Host "Error: Please run this script from the module directory" -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
if (-not (Test-Path ".")) {
Write-Host "Error: Challenge directory not found. Run setup.ps1 first." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
Write-Host "Verifying your solution..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Check if git repository exists
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] No git repository found." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Make sure we're not in a bisect session
$bisectHead = Test-Path ".git/BISECT_HEAD"
if ($bisectHead) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] You're still in a bisect session." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: End the bisect with: git bisect reset" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check if bug-commit.txt exists
if (-not (Test-Path "bug-commit.txt")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] bug-commit.txt not found." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Hint: After finding the bad commit, create a file with its hash:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " echo 'commit-hash' > bug-commit.txt" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Read the commit hash from the file
$userCommit = (Get-Content "bug-commit.txt" -Raw).Trim()
if (-not $userCommit) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] bug-commit.txt is empty." -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Get all commit hashes
$allCommits = git log --pretty=format:"%H" --reverse 2>$null
$commitArray = $allCommits -split "`n"
# The bug was introduced in commit 6 (index 5 in 0-based array)
# This is the "Refactor add function for clarity" commit
$badCommitMessage = git log --pretty=format:"%s" --grep="Refactor add function" 2>$null
$actualBadCommit = git log --pretty=format:"%H" --grep="Refactor add function" 2>$null
if (-not $actualBadCommit) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Could not find the expected bad commit." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "Something may be wrong with the repository setup." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check if user found the correct commit
if ($userCommit -ne $actualBadCommit) {
# Maybe they provided a short hash
if ($actualBadCommit -like "$userCommit*") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Correct commit identified (using short hash)!" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Incorrect commit identified." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "You identified: $userCommit" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Expected: $actualBadCommit" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Expected commit message: 'Refactor add function for clarity'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nHint: Use git bisect to find where the add function broke:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " git bisect start" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git bisect bad" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git bisect good HEAD~10" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " # Then test with: node test.py" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git bisect good # or bad" -ForegroundColor White
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
} else {
Write-Host "[PASS] Correct commit identified!" -ForegroundColor Green
}
# Verify the commit actually has the bug
git checkout $actualBadCommit 2>$null | Out-Null
$calcContent = Get-Content "calculator.py" -Raw
if ($calcContent -notmatch "add\(a, b\)[\s\S]*?return a - b") {
Write-Host "[WARNING] The identified commit doesn't seem to have the expected bug." -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# Return to latest commit
git checkout $(git branch --show-current 2>$null) 2>$null | Out-Null
if (-not $?) {
git checkout main 2>$null | Out-Null
}
# Success!
Write-Host "`n========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "SUCCESS! Challenge completed!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "========================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou have successfully:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "- Used git bisect to perform a binary search" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Tested commits systematically" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Identified the exact commit that introduced the bug" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "- Found: '$badCommitMessage'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nThe bug was in commit 6 out of 10 commits." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Manual checking: up to 10 tests" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "With bisect: only ~4 tests needed!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou now understand git bisect!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nKey takeaway:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "Bisect uses binary search to efficiently find bugs," -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "saving massive amounts of time in large codebases.`n" -ForegroundColor White
Set-Location ..
exit 0

View File

@@ -1,169 +0,0 @@
# Module 05: Git Blame - Code Archaeology
## Learning Objectives
In this module, you will:
- Use `git blame` to find who made specific changes
- Understand blame output format and information
- Track down problematic code changes
- Learn when and why to use `git blame`
- Investigate code history to understand context
## Challenge
### Setup
Run the setup script to create your challenge environment:
```powershell
.\setup.ps1
```
This will create a `challenge/` directory with a Git repository that has a security issue - someone committed hardcoded credentials!
### Your Task
Your team has discovered a security vulnerability: hardcoded credentials were added to the codebase. Your job is to investigate who made this change and document your findings.
The setup script will create an `investigation.md` file in the challenge directory with questions for you to answer. Use `git blame` and other Git commands to track down the responsible developer.
**Scenario:**
- Someone added hardcoded login credentials (`username: "admin"`, `password: "admin123"`) to `app.py`
- This is a critical security issue
- You need to identify who made this change so the team can discuss it with them
**Suggested Approach:**
1. Navigate to the challenge directory: `cd challenge`
2. Open `investigation.md` to see the questions
3. Examine `app.py` to find the suspicious line
4. Use `git blame` to find who wrote that line
5. Use `git blame -e` to see email addresses
6. Use `git show` to see the full commit details
7. Document your findings in `investigation.md`
> **Important Notes:**
> - `git blame` shows who last modified each line
> - Each line shows: commit hash, author, date, line number, and content
> - Use `-e` flag to show email addresses
> - Use `-L` to focus on specific line ranges
## Key Concepts
- **Git Blame**: Shows the revision and author who last modified each line of a file
- **Code Archaeology**: Using Git history to understand when and why code changed
- **Author Attribution**: Identifying who wrote specific code for context, not punishment
- **Commit Context**: Understanding the full story behind a change
## Understanding Git Blame Output
When you run `git blame app.py`, you'll see output like this:
```
a1b2c3d4 (John Doe 2024-01-15 10:30:45 +0000 1) # app.py - Main application
a1b2c3d4 (John Doe 2024-01-15 10:30:45 +0000 2)
e5f6g7h8 (Jane Smith 2024-01-16 14:20:10 +0000 3) from auth import login
e5f6g7h8 (Jane Smith 2024-01-16 14:20:10 +0000 4)
i9j0k1l2 (Bob Wilson 2024-01-17 09:15:30 +0000 5) def main():
i9j0k1l2 (Bob Wilson 2024-01-17 09:15:30 +0000 6) login("admin", "admin123")
```
### Breaking It Down
Each line shows:
1. **Commit Hash** (`a1b2c3d4`) - The commit that last changed this line
2. **Author Name** (`John Doe`) - Who made the change
3. **Date/Time** (`2024-01-15 10:30:45 +0000`) - When it was changed
4. **Line Number** (`1`) - The line number in the current file
5. **Line Content** (`# app.py - Main application`) - The actual code
### Useful Git Blame Options
```bash
git blame <file> # Basic blame output
git blame -e <file> # Show email addresses instead of names
git blame -L 10,20 <file> # Only show lines 10-20
git blame -L 10,+5 <file> # Show 5 lines starting from line 10
git blame -w <file> # Ignore whitespace changes
git blame <commit> <file> # Blame as of specific commit
```
### Following Up After Blame
Once you find the commit hash:
```bash
git show <commit-hash> # See the full commit details
git log -p <commit-hash> # See commit with diff
git show <commit-hash> --stat # See which files were changed
```
## When to Use Git Blame
**Good reasons to use `git blame`:**
- 🔍 Understanding why code was written a certain way
- 📚 Finding context for a piece of code
- 🐛 Identifying when a bug was introduced
- 💡 Discovering the thought process behind a decision
- 👥 Finding who to ask about specific code
**Not for blaming:**
- ❌ Finding someone to blame for mistakes
- ❌ Tracking "productivity" or code ownership
- ❌ Punishing developers for old code
**Remember:** Code archaeology is about understanding, not blaming!
## Useful Commands
### Investigation Commands
```bash
# Find who changed each line
git blame <file>
git blame -e <file> # With email addresses
# Focus on specific lines
git blame -L 10,20 <file> # Lines 10-20
git blame -L :function_name <file> # Specific function (Git 2.20+)
# See historical blame
git blame <commit>^ <file> # Blame before a specific commit
# Combine with grep
git blame <file> | grep "pattern" # Find who wrote lines matching pattern
```
### Context Commands
```bash
# See full commit details
git show <commit-hash>
git log -1 <commit-hash> # Just the commit message
# See all commits by author
git log --author="name"
# See what else changed in that commit
git show <commit-hash> --stat
```
## Verification
Once you've completed your investigation in `investigation.md`, verify your solution:
```powershell
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification script will check that you've identified the correct developer.
## Need to Start Over?
If you want to reset the challenge and start fresh:
```powershell
.\reset.ps1
```
This will remove the challenge directory and run the setup script again, giving you a clean slate.

View File

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the Module 05 challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
This script removes the challenge directory and re-runs the setup script
to give you a fresh start.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Resetting Module 05 Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Remove challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
Write-Host "Challenge directory removed." -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "No challenge directory found to remove." -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# Run setup script
Write-Host "`nRunning setup script..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
& "./setup.ps1"

View File

@@ -1,323 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the Module 05 challenge environment for git blame investigation.
.DESCRIPTION
This script creates a challenge directory with a Git repository that
contains a security vulnerability (hardcoded credentials) for students
to investigate using git blame.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Setting up Module 05 Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Remove existing challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
}
# Create fresh challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Green
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize Git repository
Write-Host "Initializing Git repository..." -ForegroundColor Green
git init | Out-Null
# Commit 1: Initial project structure (by Alice)
Write-Host "Creating initial project structure..." -ForegroundColor Green
git config user.name "Alice Johnson"
git config user.email "alice@example.com"
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Main application file
def main():
print("Welcome to My App!")
# Application initialization code here
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial project structure" | Out-Null
# Commit 2: Add authentication module (by Bob)
Write-Host "Adding authentication module..." -ForegroundColor Green
git config user.name "Bob Chen"
git config user.email "bob@example.com"
$authContent = @"
# auth.py - Authentication module
def login(username, password):
# Authenticate user
print(f"Logging in user: {username}")
return True
def logout(username):
# Log out user
print(f"Logging out user: {username}")
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "auth.py" -Value $authContent
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Main application file
from auth import login, logout
def main():
print("Welcome to My App!")
# Application initialization code here
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add authentication module" | Out-Null
# Commit 3: Add database connection (by Carol)
Write-Host "Adding database connection..." -ForegroundColor Green
git config user.name "Carol Martinez"
git config user.email "carol@example.com"
$databaseContent = @"
# database.py - Database connection module
def connect():
# Connect to database
print("Connecting to database...")
return True
def disconnect():
# Disconnect from database
print("Disconnecting from database...")
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "database.py" -Value $databaseContent
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Main application file
from auth import login, logout
from database import connect, disconnect
def main():
print("Welcome to My App!")
connect()
# Application initialization code here
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add database connection" | Out-Null
# Commit 4: Add hardcoded credentials (THE SECURITY ISSUE - by Suspicious Developer)
Write-Host "Adding suspicious change..." -ForegroundColor Green
git config user.name "Suspicious Developer"
git config user.email "guilty@email.com"
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Main application file
from auth import login, logout
from database import connect, disconnect
def main():
print("Welcome to My App!")
connect()
# Quick fix for testing - TODO: Remove before production!
if login("admin", "admin123"):
print("Admin logged in successfully")
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add quick test login for debugging" | Out-Null
# Commit 5: Add logging (by David - innocent commit after the security issue)
Write-Host "Adding logging module..." -ForegroundColor Green
git config user.name "David Lee"
git config user.email "david@example.com"
$loggingContent = @"
# logging_config.py - Logging configuration
import logging
def setup_logging():
logging.basicConfig(
level=logging.INFO,
format='%(asctime)s - %(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s'
)
return logging.getLogger(__name__)
"@
Set-Content -Path "logging_config.py" -Value $loggingContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add logging configuration" | Out-Null
# Reset git config
git config user.name "Workshop Student"
git config user.email "student@example.com"
# Create investigation.md template
Write-Host "Creating investigation template..." -ForegroundColor Green
$investigationTemplate = @"
# Security Investigation Report
## Incident Overview
A security vulnerability has been discovered in the codebase: hardcoded credentials in `app.py`.
**Your task:** Use git blame and related Git commands to investigate this security issue and document your findings.
---
## Question 1: What line number contains the hardcoded password?
Look at `app.py` and find the line with `"admin123"`.
**Your Answer:**
<!-- Write the line number here -->
---
## Question 2: Who added the hardcoded credentials?
Use `git blame` to find the email address of the developer who wrote the line with the hardcoded credentials.
**Suggested commands:**
``````bash
# View blame with email addresses
git blame -e app.py
# Or focus on specific lines (if you know the line range)
git blame -L 8,10 app.py
# Look for the line containing login("admin", "admin123")
``````
**Your Answer (provide the email address):**
<!-- Write the email address here -->
---
## Question 3: What was the commit message for the change that introduced the hardcoded credentials?
Once you've found the commit hash from git blame, use `git show` or `git log` to see the full commit message.
**Suggested commands:**
``````bash
# After finding the commit hash from git blame
git show <commit-hash>
git log -1 <commit-hash>
``````
**Your Answer:**
<!-- Write the commit message here -->
---
## Question 4: How many files were modified in the commit that added the hardcoded credentials?
Use `git show` with the `--stat` flag to see which files were changed.
**Suggested commands:**
``````bash
git show <commit-hash> --stat
git show <commit-hash> --name-only
``````
**Your Answer:**
<!-- Write the number or list the files here -->
---
## Question 5: When was this security vulnerability introduced?
Use the timestamp from git blame to determine when the vulnerable code was committed.
**Your Answer (date and time):**
<!-- Write the date/time here -->
---
## Recommendations
Based on your investigation, what actions should the team take?
**Your Recommendations:**
<!-- Write your recommendations here, for example:
- Remove hardcoded credentials
- Implement proper environment variables
- Add pre-commit hooks to prevent secrets
- Review with the developer who made the change
-->
---
## Quick Reference - Investigation Commands
**Finding Who Changed What:**
``````bash
git blame <file> # Show who last modified each line
git blame -e <file> # Show with email addresses
git blame -L 10,20 <file> # Blame specific line range
``````
**Getting Commit Details:**
``````bash
git show <commit-hash> # See full commit details
git show <commit-hash> --stat # See files changed
git log -1 <commit-hash> # See commit message only
git log -p <commit-hash> # See commit with diff
``````
**Searching History:**
``````bash
git log --all --grep="keyword" # Search commit messages
git log --author="name" # See commits by author
git log --since="2 weeks ago" # Recent commits
``````
---
When you're done with your investigation, run ``..\verify.ps1`` to check your answers!
"@
Set-Content -Path "investigation.md" -Value $investigationTemplate
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n=== Setup Complete! ===" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYour investigation environment is ready in the 'challenge/' directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nScenario: Someone committed hardcoded credentials to app.py!" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nNext steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Open 'investigation.md' to see the investigation questions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Use 'git blame -e app.py' to start your investigation" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. Fill in your findings in 'investigation.md'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 5. Run '..\verify.ps1' to check your investigation" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""

View File

@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the Module 05 challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
This script checks that:
- The challenge directory exists
- A Git repository exists
- investigation.md exists with correct findings about the security issue
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying Module 05 Solution ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
$allChecksPassed = $true
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "challenge")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Challenge directory not found. Did you run setup.ps1?" -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
Set-Location "challenge"
# Check if git repository exists
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Not a git repository. Did you run setup.ps1?" -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check if investigation.md exists
if (-not (Test-Path "investigation.md")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] investigation.md not found. Did you run setup.ps1?" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] The setup script should have created investigation.md for you" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
} else {
Write-Host "[PASS] investigation.md exists" -ForegroundColor Green
# Read the investigation file
$investigation = Get-Content "investigation.md" -Raw
$investigationLower = $investigation.ToLower()
# Check 1: Line number (line 8 contains the hardcoded password)
if ($investigationLower -match "8") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Correct line number identified" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Line number not found or incorrect" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Look at app.py to find which line contains 'admin123'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check 2: Email address (guilty@email.com)
if ($investigationLower -match "guilty@email\.com") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Correct email address found using git blame!" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Developer's email address not found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Use 'git blame -e app.py' to see who changed each line with email addresses" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check 3: Commit message (contains "test" or "debug" or "quick")
if ($investigationLower -match "test|debug|quick") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Commit message identified" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Commit message not found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Use 'git show <commit-hash>' to see the commit message" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check 4: Number of files (1 file - only app.py)
if ($investigationLower -match "1|one|app\.py") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Number of files modified identified" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Number of files modified not found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Use 'git show <commit-hash> --stat' to see which files were changed" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check 5: Some mention of timestamp/date (flexible check)
# We're just checking they attempted to answer this
if ($investigationLower -match "202|date|time|\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Timestamp/date documented" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Timestamp/date not documented" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] The git blame output shows the date and time of each change" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
}
Set-Location ..
# Final summary
if ($allChecksPassed) {
Write-Host "`n" -NoNewline
Write-Host "=====================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host " INVESTIGATION COMPLETE!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "=====================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nExcellent detective work! You've successfully used git blame to track down the security issue." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nYou now know how to:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " - Use git blame to find who modified each line" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - Read and interpret git blame output" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - Use git blame with -e flag to show email addresses" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - Find commit details after identifying changes with blame" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - Conduct code archaeology to understand code history" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nRemember: git blame is for understanding, not blaming!" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`nReady for the next module!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host ""
} else {
Write-Host "`n[SUMMARY] Some checks failed. Review the hints above and try again." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[INFO] You can run this verification script as many times as needed." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host ""
exit 1
}

View File

@@ -1,448 +0,0 @@
# Module 06: Merge Strategies - Fast-Forward vs Three-Way
## Learning Objectives
In this module, you will:
- Understand the difference between fast-forward and three-way merges
- Learn when Git automatically chooses each strategy
- Force specific merge behavior with `--no-ff` and `--ff-only` flags
- Understand the trade-offs between linear and branched history
- Make informed decisions about merge strategies for different workflows
## Prerequisites
Before starting this module, you should have completed:
- Module 03: Branching Basics
- Module 04: Merging Branches
## Challenge
### Setup
Run the setup script to create your challenge environment:
```powershell
.\setup.ps1
```
This will create a `challenge/` directory with scenarios for both fast-forward and three-way merges.
### Your Task
You'll experiment with both types of merges and learn how to control Git's merge behavior.
**Part 1: Fast-Forward Merge**
1. Merge `feature-fast-forward` into main
2. Observe Git's "Fast-forward" message
3. Examine the linear history
**Part 2: Three-Way Merge**
4. Merge `feature-divergent` into main
5. Observe Git creates a merge commit
6. Examine the branched history
**Part 3: Force Merge Commit**
7. Merge `feature-optional` into main using `--no-ff`
8. Compare with the fast-forward from Part 1
**Steps:**
1. Navigate to the challenge directory: `cd challenge`
2. View all branches: `git branch -a`
3. View the current graph: `git log --oneline --graph --all`
4. Merge feature-fast-forward: `git merge feature-fast-forward`
5. Check the log: `git log --oneline --graph`
6. Merge feature-divergent: `git merge feature-divergent`
7. Check the log: `git log --oneline --graph --all`
8. Merge feature-optional with --no-ff: `git merge --no-ff feature-optional`
9. Compare the results: `git log --oneline --graph --all`
> **Key Questions to Consider:**
> - Which merges created merge commits?
> - Which merge kept a linear history?
> - How does `--no-ff` change Git's behavior?
> - When would you prefer each approach?
## Understanding Merge Strategies
### Fast-Forward Merge
A **fast-forward merge** happens when the target branch (e.g., `main`) hasn't changed since the feature branch was created. Git simply "fast-forwards" the branch pointer to the latest commit on the feature branch.
**Before the merge:**
```
main: A---B
\
feature: C---D
```
In this scenario:
- Commit B is where `feature` branched off from `main`
- Commits C and D are new commits on the `feature` branch
- `main` has NO new commits since the branch split
- The history is **linear** (straight line from A to D)
**After `git merge feature` (on main):**
```
main: A---B---C---D
feature
```
**What happened:**
- Git moved the `main` pointer forward to commit D
- NO merge commit was created
- The history remains linear (a straight line)
- Both `main` and `feature` now point to the same commit (D)
**Command:**
```bash
git switch main
git merge feature-fast-forward
```
**Output you'll see:**
```
Updating abc123..def456
Fast-forward
new-feature.py | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
```
**Notice the "Fast-forward" message!**
**Characteristics:**
- ✅ Keeps history linear and clean
- ✅ Simpler to read in `git log`
- ✅ No extra merge commit
- ❌ Loses visibility that work was done on a branch
- ❌ Harder to revert entire features at once
---
### Three-Way Merge
A **three-way merge** happens when BOTH branches have new commits since they diverged. Git must combine changes from both branches, which creates a special merge commit.
**Before the merge:**
```
main: A---B---C---E
\
feature: D---F
```
In this scenario:
- Commit B is where `feature` branched off from `main`
- Commits C and E are new commits on `main`
- Commits D and F are new commits on `feature`
- The branches have **diverged** (both have unique commits)
**After `git merge feature` (on main):**
```
main: A---B---C---E---M
\ /
feature: D---F---/
```
**What happened:**
- Git created a new **merge commit** (M)
- Commit M has TWO parent commits: E (from main) and F (from feature)
- The merge commit combines changes from both branches
- The history shows the branches converging
**Why it's called "three-way":**
Git uses THREE commits to perform the merge:
1. **Commit B** - The common ancestor (where branches split)
2. **Commit E** - The latest commit on `main`
3. **Commit F** - The latest commit on `feature`
Git compares all three to figure out what changed on each branch and how to combine them.
**Command:**
```bash
git switch main
git merge feature-divergent
```
**Output you'll see:**
```
Merge made by the 'ort' strategy.
feature-code.py | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
```
**Notice it says "Merge made by the 'ort' strategy" instead of "Fast-forward"!**
**Characteristics:**
- ✅ Preserves feature branch history
- ✅ Shows when features were merged
- ✅ Easier to revert entire features (revert the merge commit)
- ✅ Clear visualization in git log --graph
- ❌ Creates more commits (merge commits)
- ❌ History can become complex with many merges
---
### When Does Each Type Happen?
| Situation | Merge Type | Merge Commit? | Git's Behavior |
|-----------|------------|---------------|----------------|
| Target branch (main) has NO new commits | Fast-Forward | ❌ No | Automatic |
| Target branch (main) HAS new commits | Three-Way | ✅ Yes | Automatic |
| You use `--no-ff` flag | Three-Way | ✅ Yes | Forced |
| You use `--ff-only` flag | Fast-Forward | ❌ No | Fails if not possible |
**Git chooses automatically** based on the branch state, but you can override this behavior!
---
## Controlling Merge Behavior
### Force a Merge Commit with `--no-ff`
Even if a fast-forward is possible, you can force Git to create a merge commit:
```bash
git merge --no-ff feature-optional
```
**Before (fast-forward would be possible):**
```
main: A---B
\
feature: C---D
```
**After `git merge --no-ff feature` (on main):**
```
main: A---B-------M
\ /
feature: C---D
```
Notice that even though main didn't change, a merge commit (M) was created!
**When to use `--no-ff`:**
- ✅ When you want to preserve the feature branch in history
- ✅ For important features that might need to be reverted
- ✅ In team workflows where you want to see when features were merged
- ✅ When following a branching model like Git Flow
**Example:**
```bash
# You've finished a major feature on feature-auth
git switch main
git merge --no-ff feature-auth -m "Merge feature-auth: Add user authentication system"
```
This creates a clear marker in history showing when and what was merged.
---
### Require Fast-Forward with `--ff-only`
You can make Git fail the merge if a fast-forward isn't possible:
```bash
git merge --ff-only feature-branch
```
**What happens:**
- ✅ If fast-forward is possible, Git merges
- ❌ If branches have diverged, Git refuses to merge
**Output when it fails:**
```
fatal: Not possible to fast-forward, aborting.
```
**When to use `--ff-only`:**
- ✅ When you want to keep history strictly linear
- ✅ To ensure you rebase before merging
- ✅ In workflows that prohibit merge commits
**Example workflow:**
```bash
# Try to merge
git merge --ff-only feature-branch
# If it fails, rebase first
git switch feature-branch
git rebase main
git switch main
git merge --ff-only feature-branch # Now it works!
```
---
## Visualizing the Difference
### Linear History (Fast-Forward)
```bash
git log --oneline --graph
```
```
* d1e2f3g (HEAD -> main, feature) Add feature C
* a4b5c6d Add feature B
* 7e8f9g0 Add feature A
* 1a2b3c4 Initial commit
```
Notice the straight line! No branching visible.
---
### Branched History (Three-Way Merge)
```bash
git log --oneline --graph --all
```
```
* m1e2r3g (HEAD -> main) Merge branch 'feature'
|\
| * f4e5a6t (feature) Add feature implementation
| * u7r8e9s Feature setup
* | a1b2c3d Update documentation on main
|/
* 0i1n2i3t Initial commit
```
Notice the branching pattern! You can see:
- Where the branch split (`|/`)
- Commits on each branch (`|`)
- Where branches merged (`* merge commit`)
---
## Decision Guide: Which Strategy to Use?
### Use Fast-Forward When:
- ✅ Working on personal projects
- ✅ Want simplest, cleanest history
- ✅ Small changes or bug fixes
- ✅ Don't need to track feature branches
- ✅ History readability is top priority
### Use Three-Way Merge (or force with --no-ff) When:
- ✅ Working in teams
- ✅ Want to preserve feature context
- ✅ Need to revert features as units
- ✅ Following Git Flow or similar workflow
- ✅ Important to see when features were integrated
### Force Fast-Forward (--ff-only) When:
- ✅ Enforcing rebase workflow
- ✅ Maintaining strictly linear history
- ✅ Integration branch requires clean history
---
## Comparison Table
| Aspect | Fast-Forward | Three-Way |
|--------|-------------|-----------|
| **When it happens** | Target branch unchanged | Both branches have new commits |
| **Merge commit created?** | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| **History appearance** | Linear | Branched |
| **Command output** | "Fast-forward" | "Merge made by..." |
| **Git log --graph** | Straight line | Fork and merge pattern |
| **Can revert entire feature?** | ❌ No (must revert each commit) | ✅ Yes (revert merge commit) |
| **Force it** | `--ff-only` | `--no-ff` |
| **Best for** | Solo work, small changes | Team work, features |
---
## Useful Commands
### Merging with Strategy Control
```bash
git merge <branch> # Let Git decide automatically
git merge --no-ff <branch> # Force a merge commit
git merge --ff-only <branch> # Only merge if fast-forward possible
git merge --abort # Cancel a merge in progress
```
### Viewing Different Merge Types
```bash
# See all merges
git log --merges # Only merge commits
git log --no-merges # Hide merge commits
# Visualize history
git log --oneline --graph # See branch structure
git log --oneline --graph --all # Include all branches
git log --first-parent # Follow only main branch line
# Check if merge would be fast-forward
git merge-base main feature # Find common ancestor
git log main..feature # See commits unique to feature
```
### Configuring Default Behavior
```bash
# Disable fast-forward by default
git config merge.ff false # Always create merge commits
# Only allow fast-forward
git config merge.ff only # Refuse non-fast-forward merges
# Reset to default
git config --unset merge.ff
```
---
## Common Patterns in the Wild
### GitHub Flow (Simple)
- Use fast-forward when possible
- Short-lived feature branches
- Merge to main frequently
### Git Flow (Structured)
- Always use `--no-ff` for features
- Preserve branch history
- Complex release management
### Rebase Workflow
- Always use `--ff-only`
- Rebase before merging
- Strictly linear history
---
## Verification
Once you've completed all three merges, verify your solution:
```powershell
.\verify.ps1
```
The verification script will check that you've experienced both types of merges and used the `--no-ff` flag.
## Need to Start Over?
If you want to reset the challenge and start fresh:
```powershell
.\reset.ps1
```
This will remove the challenge directory and run the setup script again, giving you a clean slate.
## What's Next?
Now that you understand merge strategies, you can make informed decisions about your workflow. Consider:
- **For personal projects:** Fast-forward merges keep history simple
- **For team projects:** Three-way merges preserve context
- **For open source:** Follow the project's contribution guidelines
The best strategy depends on your team's needs and workflow!

View File

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Resets the Module 06 challenge environment.
.DESCRIPTION
This script removes the challenge directory and re-runs the setup script
to give you a fresh start.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Resetting Module 06 Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Remove challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
Write-Host "Challenge directory removed." -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "No challenge directory found to remove." -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
# Run setup script
Write-Host "`nRunning setup script..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
& "./setup.ps1"

View File

@@ -1,221 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Sets up the Module 06 challenge environment for learning merge strategies.
.DESCRIPTION
This script creates a challenge directory with a Git repository that
contains scenarios for both fast-forward and three-way merges, allowing
students to compare different merge strategies.
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Setting up Module 06 Challenge ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Remove existing challenge directory if it exists
if (Test-Path "challenge") {
Write-Host "Removing existing challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Remove-Item -Recurse -Force "challenge"
}
# Create fresh challenge directory
Write-Host "Creating challenge directory..." -ForegroundColor Green
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path "challenge" | Out-Null
Set-Location "challenge"
# Initialize Git repository
Write-Host "Initializing Git repository..." -ForegroundColor Green
git init | Out-Null
# Configure git for this repository
git config user.name "Workshop Student"
git config user.email "student@example.com"
# ========================================
# Scenario 1: Fast-Forward Merge Setup
# ========================================
Write-Host "Setting up fast-forward merge scenario..." -ForegroundColor Green
# Commit 1: Initial structure on main
$appContent = @"
# app.py - Main application
def main():
print("Application started")
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
"@
Set-Content -Path "app.py" -Value $appContent
git add .
git commit -m "Initial application structure" | Out-Null
# Create feature-fast-forward branch (main won't change after this)
git switch -c feature-fast-forward | Out-Null
# Commit on feature-fast-forward
$utilsContent = @"
# utils.py - Utility functions
def format_string(text):
"""Format a string to title case."""
return text.title()
def validate_input(text):
"""Validate user input."""
return text and len(text) > 0
"@
Set-Content -Path "utils.py" -Value $utilsContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add utility functions" | Out-Null
# Second commit on feature-fast-forward
$utilsContent = @"
# utils.py - Utility functions
def format_string(text):
"""Format a string to title case."""
return text.title()
def validate_input(text):
"""Validate user input."""
return text and len(text) > 0
def sanitize_input(text):
"""Remove dangerous characters from input."""
return text.replace("<", "").replace(">", "")
"@
Set-Content -Path "utils.py" -Value $utilsContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add input sanitization" | Out-Null
# ========================================
# Scenario 2: Three-Way Merge Setup
# ========================================
Write-Host "Setting up three-way merge scenario..." -ForegroundColor Green
# Switch back to main
git switch main | Out-Null
# Create feature-divergent branch
git switch -c feature-divergent | Out-Null
# Commit on feature-divergent
$authContent = @"
# auth.py - Authentication module
def authenticate(username, password):
"""Authenticate a user."""
print(f"Authenticating: {username}")
# TODO: Implement actual authentication
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "auth.py" -Value $authContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add authentication module" | Out-Null
# Second commit on feature-divergent
$authContent = @"
# auth.py - Authentication module
def authenticate(username, password):
"""Authenticate a user."""
print(f"Authenticating: {username}")
# TODO: Implement actual authentication
return True
def check_permissions(user, resource):
"""Check if user has permission for resource."""
print(f"Checking permissions for {user}")
return True
"@
Set-Content -Path "auth.py" -Value $authContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add permission checking" | Out-Null
# Switch back to main and make a commit (creates divergence)
git switch main | Out-Null
$readmeContent = @"
# My Application
A Python application with utilities and authentication.
## Features
- String formatting and validation
- User authentication
- Permission management
## Setup
1. Install Python 3.8+
2. Run: python app.py
"@
Set-Content -Path "README.md" -Value $readmeContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add README documentation" | Out-Null
# ========================================
# Scenario 3: Optional Fast-Forward for --no-ff
# ========================================
Write-Host "Setting up --no-ff demonstration scenario..." -ForegroundColor Green
# Create feature-optional branch (main won't change after this)
git switch -c feature-optional | Out-Null
# Commit on feature-optional
$configContent = @"
# config.py - Configuration settings
DEBUG_MODE = False
LOG_LEVEL = "INFO"
DATABASE_URL = "sqlite:///app.db"
"@
Set-Content -Path "config.py" -Value $configContent
git add .
git commit -m "Add configuration module" | Out-Null
# Switch back to main
git switch main | Out-Null
# Return to module directory
Set-Location ..
Write-Host "`n=== Setup Complete! ===" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYour challenge environment is ready in the 'challenge/' directory." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nYou have THREE scenarios set up:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host "`n Scenario 1: Fast-Forward Merge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " Branch: feature-fast-forward" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " Status: main has NOT changed since branch was created" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " Result: Will fast-forward (no merge commit)" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`n Scenario 2: Three-Way Merge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " Branch: feature-divergent" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " Status: BOTH main and branch have new commits" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " Result: Will create merge commit" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`n Scenario 3: Force Merge Commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " Branch: feature-optional" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " Status: Could fast-forward, but we'll use --no-ff" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " Result: Will create merge commit even though fast-forward is possible" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nNext steps:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " 1. cd challenge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. View initial state: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Merge fast-forward: git merge feature-fast-forward" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 4. View result: git log --oneline --graph" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 5. Merge divergent: git merge feature-divergent" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 6. View result: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 7. Merge with --no-ff: git merge --no-ff feature-optional" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 8. View final result: git log --oneline --graph --all" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 9. Compare all three merges!" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 10. Run '..\verify.ps1' to check your solution" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""

View File

@@ -1,140 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Verifies the Module 06 challenge solution.
.DESCRIPTION
This script checks that:
- The challenge directory exists
- A Git repository exists
- All three feature branches have been merged
- Appropriate merge strategies were used
- Student understands the difference between fast-forward and three-way merges
#>
Write-Host "`n=== Verifying Module 06 Solution ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
$allChecksPassed = $true
# Check if challenge directory exists
if (-not (Test-Path "challenge")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Challenge directory not found. Did you run setup.ps1?" -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
Set-Location "challenge"
# Check if git repository exists
if (-not (Test-Path ".git")) {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Not a git repository. Did you run setup.ps1?" -ForegroundColor Red
Set-Location ..
exit 1
}
# Check current branch is main
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current 2>$null
if ($currentBranch -eq "main") {
Write-Host "[PASS] Currently on main branch" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Not on main branch (currently on: $currentBranch)" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Switch to main with: git switch main" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check 1: Fast-Forward Merge - utils.py should exist
if (Test-Path "utils.py") {
Write-Host "[PASS] utils.py exists (feature-fast-forward merged)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] utils.py not found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Merge feature-fast-forward: git merge feature-fast-forward" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check 2: Three-Way Merge - auth.py should exist
if (Test-Path "auth.py") {
Write-Host "[PASS] auth.py exists (feature-divergent merged)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] auth.py not found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Merge feature-divergent: git merge feature-divergent" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check 3: --no-ff Merge - config.py should exist
if (Test-Path "config.py") {
Write-Host "[PASS] config.py exists (feature-optional merged)" -ForegroundColor Green
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] config.py not found" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Merge feature-optional: git merge --no-ff feature-optional" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Check for merge commits
$mergeCommits = git log --merges --oneline 2>$null
$mergeCount = ($mergeCommits | Measure-Object -Line).Lines
if ($mergeCount -ge 2) {
Write-Host "[PASS] Found $mergeCount merge commit(s)" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "[INFO] Expected: 1 from three-way merge + 1 from --no-ff = 2 total" -ForegroundColor Cyan
} else {
Write-Host "[FAIL] Only found $mergeCount merge commit(s), expected at least 2" -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[HINT] Make sure to:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " 1. Merge feature-divergent (creates merge commit)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " 2. Merge feature-optional with --no-ff flag (forces merge commit)" -ForegroundColor Yellow
$allChecksPassed = $false
}
# Provide detailed merge analysis
Write-Host "`n--- Merge Analysis ---" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# Count total commits
$totalCommits = git rev-list --count HEAD 2>$null
Write-Host "[INFO] Total commits on main: $totalCommits" -ForegroundColor Cyan
# List merge commits
if ($mergeCommits) {
Write-Host "[INFO] Merge commits found:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
$mergeCommits | ForEach-Object {
Write-Host " $_" -ForegroundColor White
}
}
# Check if branches still exist
$branches = git branch 2>$null
Write-Host "[INFO] Existing branches:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
$branches | ForEach-Object {
Write-Host " $_" -ForegroundColor White
}
Set-Location ..
# Final summary
if ($allChecksPassed) {
Write-Host "`n" -NoNewline
Write-Host "=====================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host " CONGRATULATIONS! CHALLENGE PASSED!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "=====================================" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host "`nYou've mastered Git merge strategies!" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nYou now understand:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " - Fast-forward merges (linear history, no merge commit)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - Three-way merges (divergent branches, creates merge commit)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - How to force merge commits with --no-ff flag" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - When to use each merge strategy" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " - Trade-offs between linear and branched history" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host "`nKey Takeaways:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " - Git chooses the strategy automatically based on branch state" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " - Use --no-ff to preserve feature branch history" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " - Use --ff-only to enforce linear history" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " - Different workflows prefer different strategies" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "`nNow you can make informed decisions about merge strategies for your projects!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host ""
} else {
Write-Host "`n[SUMMARY] Some checks failed. Review the hints above and try again." -ForegroundColor Red
Write-Host "[INFO] You can run this verification script as many times as needed." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Quick Reference:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " git merge feature-fast-forward # Fast-forward merge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git merge feature-divergent # Three-way merge" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git merge --no-ff feature-optional # Force merge commit" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
exit 1
}

146
BEST-PRACTICES.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
# Best Practices for Cloud-Based Git Collaboration
When multiple people work on the same project, merge conflicts are inevitable. But with good habits, you can dramatically reduce how often they happen and how painful they are to resolve.
## Pull Early, Pull Often
The most common cause of merge conflicts is working on outdated code. The longer you work without syncing, the more your code drifts from what others are doing.
**Do this:**
```bash
# Start every work session by pulling
git pull
# Pull again before pushing
git pull
git push
```
**Why it works:** Small, frequent syncs mean small, manageable conflicts. A conflict in 3 lines is easy to fix. A conflict in 300 lines is a nightmare.
## Keep Commits Small and Focused
Large commits that touch many files are conflict magnets.
**Instead of this:**
```
"Implemented user authentication, fixed navbar, updated styles, refactored database"
```
**Do this:**
```
"Add login form to auth page"
"Add password validation"
"Connect login form to auth API"
"Add logout button to navbar"
```
**Why it works:**
- Smaller changes = smaller chance of overlap with others
- If a conflict does happen, it's easier to understand and resolve
- Easier to review, revert, or cherry-pick specific changes
## Communicate About Shared Files
Some files are conflict hotspots because everyone needs to edit them:
- Configuration files
- Route definitions
- Database schemas
- Shared constants or types
**Do this:**
- Tell your team when you're editing shared files
- Make those changes in dedicated commits
- Push changes to shared files quickly - don't let them sit
## Use Short-Lived Branches
Long-running branches drift further from the main branch every day.
```
main: A───B───C───D───E───F───G───H
\
feature: X───────────────────────Y
(2 weeks of drift = painful merge)
```
**Better approach:**
```
main: A───B───C───D───E───F───G───H
\ \ \
feature: X───────Y───────Z
(merge main frequently)
```
**Do this:**
- Merge main into your branch regularly (daily if active)
- Keep features small enough to complete in days, not weeks
- Break large features into smaller incremental changes
## Organize Code to Minimize Overlap
How you structure your code affects how often people collide.
**Conflict-prone structure:**
```
src/
app.py # 2000 lines, everyone edits this
utils.py # 500 lines of mixed utilities
```
**Better structure:**
```
src/
auth/
login.py
logout.py
users/
profile.py
settings.py
utils/
dates.py
strings.py
```
**Why it works:** When each file has a clear purpose, different team members naturally work in different files.
## Avoid Reformatting Wars
Nothing creates unnecessary conflicts like two people reformatting the same file differently.
**Do this:**
- Agree on code formatting standards as a team
- Use automatic formatters (Prettier, Black, etc.)
- Configure your editor to format on save
- Run formatters before committing
**Important:** If you need to reformat a file, do it in a dedicated commit with no other changes. This keeps the reformatting separate from your actual work.
## Coordinate Large Refactors
Renaming a widely-used function or moving files around will conflict with almost everyone's work.
**Do this:**
- Announce refactors to the team before starting
- Do them quickly and push immediately
- Consider doing them when others aren't actively working
- Keep refactoring commits separate from feature work
## The Golden Rules
1. **Sync frequently** - Pull before you start, pull before you push
2. **Commit small** - Many small commits beat one large commit
3. **Talk to your team** - A quick message prevents hours of conflict resolution
4. **Stay focused** - One branch = one purpose
5. **Push promptly** - Don't sit on finished work
## When Conflicts Do Happen
Even with best practices, conflicts will occur. When they do:
1. **Don't panic** - Conflicts are normal, not failures
2. **Read carefully** - Understand both sides before choosing
3. **Test after resolving** - Make sure the merged code actually works
4. **Ask if unsure** - If you don't understand the other person's code, ask them
Remember: merge conflicts are a communication problem as much as a technical one. The best tool for reducing conflicts is talking to your team.

123
COMMIT-MESSAGES.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
# Writing Good Commit Messages
A good commit message explains **what** the change does and **why** it matters. Your future self (and your teammates) will thank you.
## The Golden Rule: Write the Intent
Write your message as a command - what will this commit **do** when applied?
**Good (imperative, present tense):**
```
Add login button to navbar
Fix crash when username is empty
Remove unused database connection
```
**Avoid (past tense, describing what you did):**
```
Added login button to navbar
Fixed crash when username is empty
Removed unused database connection
```
**Why?** Think of it as completing this sentence:
> "If applied, this commit will... **add login button to navbar**"
## Use Prefixes to Categorize
Start your message with a prefix that tells readers what kind of change this is:
| Prefix | Use For | Example |
|--------|---------|---------|
| `feat:` | New features | `feat: add password reset flow` |
| `fix:` | Bug fixes | `fix: prevent duplicate form submission` |
| `docs:` | Documentation only | `docs: add API examples to README` |
| `style:` | Formatting, no code change | `style: fix indentation in auth module` |
| `refactor:` | Code change that doesn't fix or add | `refactor: extract validation logic` |
| `test:` | Adding or fixing tests | `test: add unit tests for login` |
| `chore:` | Maintenance, dependencies | `chore: update pytest to 8.0` |
## Keep It Short
The first line should be **50 characters or less**. This ensures it displays properly in:
- Git log output
- GitHub/Azure DevOps commit lists
- Email notifications
```
fix: resolve memory leak in image processing
│ │
└──────────── 45 characters ─────────────────┘
```
## Add Details When Needed
For complex changes, add a blank line and then more context:
```
fix: prevent crash when user uploads empty file
The application crashed because we tried to read the first byte
of an empty file. Now we check file size before processing.
Closes #142
```
Use the body to explain:
- **Why** this change was necessary
- **What** was the problem or context
- **How** does this approach solve it (if not obvious)
## Examples
**Simple bug fix:**
```
fix: correct tax calculation for EU customers
```
**New feature:**
```
feat: add dark mode toggle to settings
```
**With context:**
```
refactor: split user service into smaller modules
The user service had grown to 800 lines and was handling
authentication, profile management, and notifications.
Split into three focused modules for maintainability.
```
**Documentation:**
```
docs: add setup instructions for Windows
```
## Quick Reference
```
<prefix>: <what this commit does>
[optional body: why and how]
[optional footer: references issues]
```
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Starts with a prefix (`feat:`, `fix:`, etc.)
- [ ] Uses imperative mood ("add" not "added")
- [ ] First line under 50 characters
- [ ] Explains why, not just what (for complex changes)
## Common Mistakes
| Instead of... | Write... |
|---------------|----------|
| `fixed bug` | `fix: prevent null pointer in search` |
| `updates` | `feat: add email notifications` |
| `WIP` | `feat: add basic form validation` |
| `stuff` | `chore: clean up unused imports` |
| `fix: fix the bug` | `fix: handle empty input in calculator` |
Your commit history tells the story of your project. Make it a story worth reading.

View File

@@ -47,14 +47,15 @@ Advanced Git workflows for power users:
### For Module 08: Multiplayer Git
**This module is different!** It uses a real Git server for authentic collaboration:
**This module is different!** It uses Azure DevOps for authentic cloud-based collaboration:
1. Navigate to `01-essentials/08-multiplayer`
2. Read the `README.md` for complete instructions
3. **No setup script** - you'll clone from https://git.frod.dk/multiplayer
3. **No setup script** - you'll clone from Azure DevOps (URL provided by facilitator)
4. Work with a partner on shared branches
5. Experience real merge conflicts and pull requests
6. **No verify script** - success is visual (your code appears in the final output)
6. Use SSH keys for secure authentication (best practice)
7. **No verify script** - success is visual (your code appears in the final output)
**Facilitators**: See `01-essentials/08-multiplayer/FACILITATOR-SETUP.md` for server setup and workshop guidance.
@@ -285,7 +286,8 @@ By completing this workshop, you'll be able to:
- ✅ **Collaborate with teammates on shared repositories**
- ✅ **Resolve real merge conflicts in a team environment**
- ✅ **Create and review pull requests**
- ✅ **Use Git on a real cloud server (Gitea)**
- ✅ **Use Git on a real cloud server (Azure DevOps)**
- ✅ **Use SSH keys for secure Git authentication**
### From Advanced Track:
- ✅ Rebase to maintain clean, linear history
@@ -336,37 +338,46 @@ The workshop format combines instructor-led sessions with self-paced hands-on mo
### Setting Up Module 08: Multiplayer Git
Module 08 requires a Git server for authentic collaboration. You have two options:
Module 08 requires a Git server for authentic collaboration using **Azure DevOps**.
**Option 1: Self-Hosted Gitea Server (Recommended)**
**Azure DevOps Setup**
Run your own Git server with Gitea using Docker and Cloudflare Tunnel:
Use Azure DevOps as the cloud-based Git platform for this module:
**Benefits:**
- 💰 Completely free (no cloud costs)
- 🔒 Full control over your data
- 🌐 Accessible from anywhere via Cloudflare Tunnel
- 🚀 Quick setup with Docker Compose
- 👥 Perfect for workshops with 2-24 students
- 💰 Free tier supports up to 5 users with full access
- 🌐 Cloud-hosted - no server maintenance required
- 🔒 Enterprise-grade security and reliability
- 🔑 Built-in SSH key support (industry best practice)
- 👥 Perfect for workshops with any number of students (use Stakeholder licenses for >5 users)
- 📊 Built-in pull request workflows and code review tools
**Setup:**
1. See [GITEA-SETUP.md](GITEA-SETUP.md) for complete Gitea + Docker + Cloudflare Tunnel instructions
2. See `01-essentials/08-multiplayer/FACILITATOR-SETUP.md` for detailed workshop preparation:
- Creating student accounts
- Setting up The Great Print Project repository
- Pairing students
- Monitoring progress
- Troubleshooting common issues
**Setup Steps:**
**Option 2: Azure DevOps / GitHub / GitLab**
1. **Create Azure DevOps Organization** (if you don't have one):
- Sign up at [dev.azure.com](https://dev.azure.com) with a Microsoft account
- Create a new organization for your workshop
You can also use existing cloud Git platforms:
- Create organization/group for the workshop
- Set up repository with starter code (see facilitator guide)
- Create user accounts for students
- Configure permissions
2. **Set up SSH authentication** (recommended for all users):
- See [AZURE-DEVOPS-SSH-SETUP.md](AZURE-DEVOPS-SSH-SETUP.md) for complete SSH key setup instructions
- SSH provides secure, passwordless authentication (industry standard)
**Both options work - Gitea gives you more control and is free for any number of students.**
3. **Configure workshop repository and users**:
- See `01-essentials/08-multiplayer/FACILITATOR-SETUP.md` for detailed workshop preparation:
- Adding student accounts to Azure DevOps
- Creating The Great Print Project repository
- Configuring branch policies
- Pairing students
- Monitoring progress
- Troubleshooting SSH and authentication issues
**Alternative: GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket**
While this workshop uses Azure DevOps, the skills learned apply to any Git platform:
- The workflow is identical across all platforms
- SSH authentication works the same way everywhere
- Pull request concepts transfer directly
- Students can apply these skills to any Git hosting service
---
@@ -380,7 +391,7 @@ git-workshop/
├── GIT-CHEATSHEET.md # Quick reference for all Git commands
├── WORKSHOP-AGENDA.md # Facilitator guide for running workshops
├── PRESENTATION-OUTLINE.md # Slide deck outline
├── GITEA-SETUP.md # Self-hosted Git server setup
├── AZURE-DEVOPS-SSH-SETUP.md # SSH authentication best practices for Azure DevOps
├── install-glow.ps1 # Install glow markdown renderer
├── 01-essentials/ # Core Git skills (8 modules)
@@ -406,15 +417,16 @@ git-workshop/
## What's Unique About This Workshop
### The Great Print Project (Module 07)
### The Great Print Project (Module 08)
Unlike any other Git tutorial, Module 08 provides **real collaborative experience**:
- **Real Git server**: Not simulated - actual cloud repository at https://git.frod.dk/multiplayer
- **Real Git server**: Not simulated - actual Azure DevOps cloud repository
- **Real teammates**: Work in pairs on shared branches
- **Real conflicts**: Both partners edit the same code and must resolve conflicts together
- **Real pull requests**: Create PRs, review code, merge to main
- **Real success**: When all pairs merge, run `python main.py` and see everyone's contributions!
- **Real security**: Use SSH keys for authentication (industry best practice)
**The challenge**: Each pair implements 3 Python functions (e.g., `print_b()`, `print_c()`, `print_d()`) in a shared repository. When complete, the program prints the alphabet A-Z and numbers 0-9.
@@ -459,8 +471,8 @@ A: Absolutely! See the "For Workshop Facilitators" section above. The materials
**Q: Do I need internet access?**
A: Modules 01-07 work completely offline. Module 08 requires internet to access the Git server.
**Q: What if I prefer GitHub/GitLab instead of Gitea?**
A: The skills are identical across all Git platforms. Module 08 uses Gitea but everything you learn applies to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.
**Q: What if I prefer GitHub/GitLab instead of Azure DevOps?**
A: The skills are identical across all Git platforms. Module 08 uses Azure DevOps but everything you learn applies directly to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and any other Git hosting service. The SSH authentication, pull request workflow, and collaboration patterns are the same everywhere.
---

124
WHAT-IS-GIT.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
# What is Git?
Git is a tool that tracks changes to your files over time. Think of it as an "undo history" for your entire project that you can browse, search, and share with others.
## Commits: Snapshots of Your Project
A **commit** is like taking a photo of your entire project at a specific moment in time.
Every time you make a commit, Git:
1. Records what **all** your files look like right now
2. Adds a message describing what changed
3. Notes who made the change and when
4. Links back to the previous commit
### Every Commit Contains Everything
This is important: each commit is a complete snapshot of **all** files in your project - not just the files you changed. You can check out any commit and see the entire project exactly as it was.
But wait - doesn't that waste a lot of space? No! Git is clever about this.
### Unchanged Files Are Reused
If a file hasn't changed since the last commit, Git doesn't store a new copy. Instead, it simply points to the version it already has:
```
Commit 1 Commit 2 Commit 3
───────── ───────── ─────────
README.md ─────────────────────────────> (same)
app.py ────────> app.py (v2) ───────> (same)
config.json ──────> (same) ────────────> config.json (v3)
```
In this example:
- `README.md` never changed - all three commits refer to the same stored version
- `app.py` changed in Commit 2, so a new version was stored
- `config.json` changed in Commit 3, so a new version was stored
This means:
- Every commit gives you the **complete picture** of your project
- Git only stores **new content** when files actually change
- Going back to any point in history is instant - no need to "replay" changes
```
Commit 3 Commit 2 Commit 1
| | |
v v v
[Add login] <-- [Fix bug] <-- [First version]
```
Each commit points back to its parent, creating a chain of history. You can always go back and see exactly what your project looked like at any point.
## The Magic of Checksums
Here's where Git gets clever. Every commit gets a unique ID called a **checksum** (or "hash"). It looks like this:
```
a1b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0...
```
This ID is calculated from the **contents** of the commit - the files, the message, the author, and the parent commit's ID.
Why does this matter?
### Verification
If even one character changes in a file, the checksum becomes completely different. This means:
- Git instantly knows if something has been corrupted or tampered with
- You can trust that what you downloaded is exactly what was uploaded
### Finding Differences
When you connect to another copy of the repository, Git compares checksums:
```
Your computer: Server:
Commit A Commit A (same checksum = identical)
Commit B Commit B (same checksum = identical)
Commit C (missing) (you have something new!)
```
Git doesn't need to compare every file. It just compares the short checksums to instantly know what's different.
## Distributed: Everyone Has a Full Copy
Unlike older systems where one central server held all the history, Git is **distributed**. This means:
- Every person has a complete copy of the entire project history
- You can work offline - commit, browse history, create branches
- If the server disappears, anyone's copy can restore everything
- You sync with others by exchanging commits
```
[Alice's Computer] [Bob's Computer]
| |
Full history Full history
All branches All branches
| |
+---- [Shared Server] ------+
|
Full history
All branches
```
When Alice pushes her new commits to the server, Bob can pull them down. The checksums ensure nothing gets lost or corrupted in transit.
## Putting It All Together
1. **You work** - Edit files, create new ones, delete old ones
2. **You commit** - Take a snapshot with a descriptive message
3. **Git calculates** - Creates a unique checksum for this commit
4. **You push** - Send your commits to a shared server
5. **Others pull** - Download your commits using checksums to verify
6. **History grows** - The chain of commits gets longer
That's it! Git is essentially a distributed database of snapshots, connected together and verified by checksums. Everything else - branches, merges, rebasing - builds on these simple ideas.
## Key Takeaways
- **Commit** = A snapshot of your project at one moment
- **Checksum** = A unique fingerprint calculated from the content
- **Distributed** = Everyone has a full copy, not just the server
- **History** = A chain of commits, each pointing to its parent
You don't need to understand every detail to use Git effectively. Just remember: commit often, write clear messages, and sync with your team regularly.

View File

@@ -1,631 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
<#
.SYNOPSIS
Installs all prerequisites for the Git Workshop using winget.
.DESCRIPTION
This script automates the installation of required tools for the Git Workshop:
- PowerShell 7 (cross-platform PowerShell)
- Git 2.23+ (version control system)
- Visual Studio Code (code editor with Git integration)
Optional tools (with user prompts):
- Python 3.12 (for Module 08: Multiplayer Git)
- Windows Terminal (modern terminal experience)
The script checks for existing installations, shows clear progress, and verifies
each installation succeeded. At the end, it displays Git configuration instructions.
.EXAMPLE
PS> .\install-prerequisites.ps1
Runs the installation script with interactive prompts.
.NOTES
Requires Windows 11 with winget (App Installer) available.
Some installations may require administrator privileges.
#>
[CmdletBinding()]
param()
Set-StrictMode -Version Latest
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Continue' # Continue on errors to show all results
#region Helper Functions
function Write-ColorMessage {
param(
[string]$Message,
[string]$Color = 'White'
)
Write-Host $Message -ForegroundColor $Color
}
function Write-Step {
param([string]$Message)
Write-ColorMessage "`n=== $Message ===" -Color Cyan
}
function Write-Success {
param([string]$Message)
Write-ColorMessage "$Message" -Color Green
}
function Write-Warning {
param([string]$Message)
Write-ColorMessage "$Message" -Color Yellow
}
function Write-Error {
param([string]$Message)
Write-ColorMessage "$Message" -Color Red
}
function Test-CommandExists {
param([string]$Command)
$oldPreference = $ErrorActionPreference
$ErrorActionPreference = 'SilentlyContinue'
try {
if (Get-Command $Command -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue) {
return $true
}
return $false
}
finally {
$ErrorActionPreference = $oldPreference
}
}
function Get-InstalledVersion {
param(
[string]$Command,
[string]$VersionArg = '--version'
)
try {
$output = & $Command $VersionArg 2>&1 | Select-Object -First 1
return $output.ToString().Trim()
}
catch {
return $null
}
}
function Test-WingetAvailable {
if (-not (Test-CommandExists 'winget')) {
Write-Error "winget is not available on this system."
Write-Host "`nTo fix this:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " 1. Update Windows 11 to the latest version (Settings → Windows Update)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Install 'App Installer' from the Microsoft Store" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. Restart your computer and run this script again" -ForegroundColor White
return $false
}
return $true
}
function Install-Package {
param(
[string]$Name,
[string]$WingetId,
[string]$CheckCommand,
[string]$MinVersion = $null,
[string]$AdditionalArgs = ''
)
Write-Step "Installing $Name"
# Check if already installed
if (Test-CommandExists $CheckCommand) {
$version = Get-InstalledVersion $CheckCommand
Write-Success "$Name is already installed: $version"
if ($MinVersion -and $version) {
# Basic version check (not perfect but good enough for common cases)
if ($version -match '(\d+\.[\d.]+)') {
$installedVersion = $matches[1]
if ([version]$installedVersion -lt [version]$MinVersion) {
Write-Warning "Version $installedVersion is below minimum required version $MinVersion"
Write-Host " Attempting to upgrade..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
}
else {
return $true
}
}
}
else {
return $true
}
}
# Install using winget
Write-Host " Installing via winget: $WingetId" -ForegroundColor Cyan
$installCmd = "winget install --id $WingetId --source winget --silent $AdditionalArgs".Trim()
Write-Host " Running: $installCmd" -ForegroundColor Gray
try {
# Show progress during installation
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing $Name" -Status "Downloading and installing..." -PercentComplete 25
$result = Invoke-Expression $installCmd 2>&1
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing $Name" -Status "Verifying installation..." -PercentComplete 75
# Check if installation succeeded
Start-Sleep -Seconds 2 # Give the system time to register the new command
# Refresh environment variables in current session
$env:Path = [System.Environment]::GetEnvironmentVariable("Path", "Machine") + ";" + [System.Environment]::GetEnvironmentVariable("Path", "User")
if (Test-CommandExists $CheckCommand) {
$version = Get-InstalledVersion $CheckCommand
Write-Success "$Name installed successfully: $version"
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing $Name" -Completed
return $true
}
else {
Write-Warning "$Name installation completed, but command '$CheckCommand' not found."
Write-Host " You may need to restart your terminal or computer." -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing $Name" -Completed
return $false
}
}
catch {
Write-Error "Failed to install $Name`: $_"
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing $Name" -Completed
return $false
}
}
function Test-GitVersion {
if (-not (Test-CommandExists 'git')) {
return $false
}
$version = Get-InstalledVersion 'git'
if ($version -match 'git version (\d+\.\d+)') {
$versionNumber = [decimal]$matches[1]
if ($versionNumber -ge 2.23) {
return $true
}
else {
Write-Warning "Git version $versionNumber is below required version 2.23"
return $false
}
}
return $false
}
function Get-UserConfirmation {
param([string]$Prompt)
while ($true) {
$response = Read-Host "$Prompt (y/n)"
$response = $response.Trim().ToLower()
if ($response -eq 'y' -or $response -eq 'yes') {
return $true
}
elseif ($response -eq 'n' -or $response -eq 'no') {
return $false
}
else {
Write-Host "Please enter 'y' or 'n'" -ForegroundColor Yellow
}
}
}
#endregion
#region Main Script
Write-Host @"
Git Workshop - Prerequisites Installation Script
"@ -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "This script will install the required tools for the Git Workshop:" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • PowerShell 7 (cross-platform PowerShell)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Git 2.23+ (version control system)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Visual Studio Code (code editor)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "You will be prompted for optional tools:" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Python 3.12 (for Module 08: Multiplayer Git)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Windows Terminal (modern terminal experience)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
# Check for winget
Write-Step "Checking Prerequisites"
if (-not (Test-WingetAvailable)) {
Write-Host "`nInstallation cannot continue without winget." -ForegroundColor Red
exit 1
}
Write-Success "winget is available"
# Track installation results
$results = @{
PowerShell = $false
Git = $false
VSCode = $false
VSCodeExtensions = $false
VSCodePowerShellIntegration = $null # null = not asked, true = configured, false = skipped/failed
Python = $null # null = not attempted, true = success, false = failed
WindowsTerminal = $null
}
# Progress tracking
$totalSteps = 4 # Required installations + extensions
$currentStep = 0
Write-Host "`nStarting installation..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Note: Some installations may take a few minutes." -ForegroundColor Gray
Write-Host ""
# Progress bar helper
function Write-ProgressIndicator {
param(
[string]$Activity,
[string]$Status,
[int]$PercentComplete
)
Write-Progress -Activity $Activity -Status $Status -PercentComplete $PercentComplete
}
function Install-VSCodeExtension {
param(
[string]$ExtensionId,
[string]$ExtensionName
)
Write-Host " Installing VSCode extension: $ExtensionName" -ForegroundColor Cyan
try {
# Refresh environment to ensure code command is available
$env:Path = [System.Environment]::GetEnvironmentVariable("Path", "Machine") + ";" + [System.Environment]::GetEnvironmentVariable("Path", "User")
$result = & code --install-extension $ExtensionId 2>&1
if ($LASTEXITCODE -eq 0) {
Write-Success "VSCode extension '$ExtensionName' installed successfully"
return $true
}
else {
Write-Warning "Failed to install VSCode extension '$ExtensionName'"
Write-Host " You can install it manually later: Ctrl+Shift+X → Search '$ExtensionName'" -ForegroundColor Gray
return $false
}
}
catch {
Write-Warning "Could not install VSCode extension '$ExtensionName`: $_"
Write-Host " You can install it manually later: Ctrl+Shift+X → Search '$ExtensionName'" -ForegroundColor Gray
return $false
}
}
function Set-VSCodePowerShellIntegration {
# Ask user if they want to set PowerShell 7 as default terminal
$setAsDefault = Get-UserConfirmation "Set PowerShell 7 as the default terminal in VSCode? (Recommended for this workshop)"
if (-not $setAsDefault) {
Write-Host " Skipping PowerShell 7 terminal configuration." -ForegroundColor Gray
return $false
}
Write-Host " Configuring PowerShell 7 integration with VSCode..." -ForegroundColor Cyan
try {
# Set PowerShell 7 as the default terminal in VSCode
$vscodeSettingsPath = Join-Path $env:APPDATA "Code\User\settings.json"
$vscodeSettingsDir = Split-Path $vscodeSettingsPath -Parent
# Create directory if it doesn't exist
if (-not (Test-Path $vscodeSettingsDir)) {
New-Item -Path $vscodeSettingsDir -ItemType Directory -Force | Out-Null
}
# Read existing settings or create new
if (Test-Path $vscodeSettingsPath) {
$settings = Get-Content $vscodeSettingsPath -Raw | ConvertFrom-Json
}
else {
$settings = @{}
}
# Set PowerShell 7 as default terminal
if (-not $settings.PSObject.Properties.Name -contains "terminal.integrated.defaultProfile.windows") {
$settings | Add-Member -NotePropertyName "terminal.integrated.defaultProfile.windows" -NotePropertyValue "PowerShell"
}
else {
$settings."terminal.integrated.defaultProfile.windows" = "PowerShell"
}
# Add terminal profiles if not present
if (-not $settings.PSObject.Properties.Name -contains "terminal.integrated.profiles.windows") {
$profiles = @{
"PowerShell" = @{
"source" = "PowerShell"
"icon" = "terminal-powershell"
"path" = "pwsh.exe"
}
}
$settings | Add-Member -NotePropertyName "terminal.integrated.profiles.windows" -NotePropertyValue $profiles
}
# Save settings
$settings | ConvertTo-Json -Depth 10 | Set-Content $vscodeSettingsPath
Write-Success "VSCode configured to use PowerShell 7 as default terminal"
return $true
}
catch {
Write-Warning "Could not configure VSCode PowerShell integration automatically"
Write-Host " You can configure it manually in VSCode: Ctrl+Shift+P → Terminal: Select Default Profile → PowerShell" -ForegroundColor Gray
return $false
}
}
#region Required Installations
# Install PowerShell 7
$currentStep++
Write-ProgressIndicator -Activity "Installing Required Tools" -Status "Installing PowerShell 7 (1/3)" -PercentComplete (($currentStep / $totalSteps) * 100)
$results.PowerShell = Install-Package `
-Name "PowerShell 7" `
-WingetId "Microsoft.PowerShell" `
-CheckCommand "pwsh"
# Install Git
$currentStep++
Write-ProgressIndicator -Activity "Installing Required Tools" -Status "Installing Git (2/3)" -PercentComplete (($currentStep / $totalSteps) * 100)
$results.Git = Install-Package `
-Name "Git" `
-WingetId "Git.Git" `
-CheckCommand "git" `
-MinVersion "2.23" `
-AdditionalArgs "-e"
# Verify Git version specifically
if ($results.Git) {
if (-not (Test-GitVersion)) {
Write-Warning "Git is installed but version may be below 2.23"
$results.Git = $false
}
}
# Install Visual Studio Code
$currentStep++
Write-ProgressIndicator -Activity "Installing Required Tools" -Status "Installing Visual Studio Code (3/4)" -PercentComplete (($currentStep / $totalSteps) * 100)
$results.VSCode = Install-Package `
-Name "Visual Studio Code" `
-WingetId "Microsoft.VisualStudioCode" `
-CheckCommand "code"
# Install VSCode Extensions and configure PowerShell integration
if ($results.VSCode) {
$currentStep++
Write-ProgressIndicator -Activity "Installing Required Tools" -Status "Installing VSCode Extensions (4/4)" -PercentComplete (($currentStep / $totalSteps) * 100)
Write-Host ""
Write-Step "Configuring VSCode"
# Install PowerShell extension
$powershellExtensionResult = Install-VSCodeExtension -ExtensionId "ms-vscode.PowerShell" -ExtensionName "PowerShell"
# Configure PowerShell 7 integration (optional but recommended)
$powershellIntegrationResult = Set-VSCodePowerShellIntegration
$results.VSCodePowerShellIntegration = $powershellIntegrationResult
$results.VSCodeExtensions = $powershellExtensionResult
}
else {
$results.VSCodeExtensions = $false
}
# Clear progress bar
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing Required Tools" -Completed
#endregion
#region Optional Installations
# Python 3.12 (optional)
Write-Host ""
if (Get-UserConfirmation "Do you want to install Python 3.12? (Required for Module 08: Multiplayer Git)") {
Write-ProgressIndicator -Activity "Installing Optional Tools" -Status "Installing Python 3.12" -PercentComplete 50
$results.Python = Install-Package `
-Name "Python 3.12" `
-WingetId "Python.Python.3.12" `
-CheckCommand "python"
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing Optional Tools" -Completed
}
else {
Write-Host " Skipping Python installation." -ForegroundColor Gray
$results.Python = $null
}
# Windows Terminal (optional)
Write-Host ""
if (Get-UserConfirmation "Do you want to install Windows Terminal? (Highly recommended for better terminal experience)") {
Write-ProgressIndicator -Activity "Installing Optional Tools" -Status "Installing Windows Terminal" -PercentComplete 50
$results.WindowsTerminal = Install-Package `
-Name "Windows Terminal" `
-WingetId "Microsoft.WindowsTerminal" `
-CheckCommand "wt"
Write-Progress -Activity "Installing Optional Tools" -Completed
}
else {
Write-Host " Skipping Windows Terminal installation." -ForegroundColor Gray
$results.WindowsTerminal = $null
}
#endregion
#region Installation Summary
Write-Step "Installation Summary"
$allRequired = $results.PowerShell -and $results.Git -and $results.VSCode
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Required Tools:" -ForegroundColor White
if ($results.PowerShell) {
Write-Success "PowerShell 7"
}
else {
Write-Error "PowerShell 7 - Installation failed or needs restart"
}
if ($results.Git) {
Write-Success "Git 2.23+"
}
else {
Write-Error "Git 2.23+ - Installation failed or needs restart"
}
if ($results.VSCode) {
Write-Success "Visual Studio Code"
if ($results.VSCodeExtensions) {
Write-Success " • PowerShell extension"
}
else {
Write-Warning " • VSCode PowerShell extension may need manual installation"
}
if ($results.VSCodePowerShellIntegration -eq $true) {
Write-Success " • PowerShell 7 terminal integration"
}
elseif ($results.VSCodePowerShellIntegration -eq $false) {
Write-Host " • PowerShell 7 terminal integration: Skipped" -ForegroundColor Gray
}
}
else {
Write-Error "Visual Studio Code - Installation failed or needs restart"
}
if ($results.Python -ne $null) {
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Optional Tools:" -ForegroundColor White
if ($results.Python) {
Write-Success "Python 3.12"
}
else {
Write-Error "Python 3.12 - Installation failed or needs restart"
}
}
if ($results.WindowsTerminal -ne $null) {
if ($results.Python -eq $null) {
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Optional Tools:" -ForegroundColor White
}
if ($results.WindowsTerminal) {
Write-Success "Windows Terminal"
}
else {
Write-Error "Windows Terminal - Installation failed or needs restart"
}
}
#endregion
#region Next Steps
Write-Step "Next Steps"
if ($allRequired) {
Write-Host ""
Write-Success "All required tools installed successfully!"
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "IMPORTANT: Configure Git before your first commit:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host ""
Write-Host " git config --global user.name `"Your Name`"" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git config --global user.email `"your.email@example.com`"" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Optional: Set VS Code as Git's default editor:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " git config --global core.editor `"code --wait`"" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Verify your installation:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " pwsh --version" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " git --version" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " code --version" -ForegroundColor White
if ($results.Python) {
Write-Host " python --version" -ForegroundColor White
}
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Set PowerShell execution policy (if needed):" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " Set-ExecutionPolicy -ExecutionPolicy RemoteSigned -Scope CurrentUser" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Recommended VS Code Extensions:" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host " • GitLens - Supercharge Git capabilities" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Git Graph - View Git history visually" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • PowerShell - Better PowerShell support (from Microsoft)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
Write-Host " Install via: Ctrl+Shift+X in VS Code" -ForegroundColor Gray
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "You're ready to start the workshop!" -ForegroundColor Green
Write-Host " cd path\to\git-workshop" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " cd 01-essentials\01-basics" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " .\setup.ps1" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
}
else {
Write-Host ""
Write-Warning "Some required installations failed or need verification."
Write-Host ""
Write-Host "Troubleshooting steps:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " 1. Close and reopen your terminal (or restart your computer)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 2. Run this script again: .\install-prerequisites.ps1" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " 3. If issues persist, try manual installation:" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " See INSTALLATION.md for detailed instructions" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
if (-not $results.Git) {
Write-Host "For Git issues:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " • Restart terminal after installation (PATH needs to refresh)" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Manual download: https://git-scm.com/downloads" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
}
if (-not $results.VSCode) {
Write-Host "For VS Code issues:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " • Ensure 'Add to PATH' option is enabled during installation" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Manual download: https://code.visualstudio.com/" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
}
if (-not $results.PowerShell) {
Write-Host "For PowerShell 7 issues:" -ForegroundColor Yellow
Write-Host " • Manual download: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/releases/latest" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host " • Download the file ending in '-win-x64.msi'" -ForegroundColor White
Write-Host ""
}
exit 1
}
#endregion
exit 0

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff